diff mbox

[virtio-dev,RFC,1/2] content: reserve virtio device ID

Message ID 1466179394-4744-2-git-send-email-c.pinto@virtualopensystems.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Christian Pinto June 17, 2016, 4:03 p.m. UTC
Signed-off-by: Christian Pinto <c.pinto@virtualopensystems.com>
---
 content.tex | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Stefan Hajnoczi June 23, 2016, 6:57 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:03:13PM +0200, Christian Pinto wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Christian Pinto <c.pinto@virtualopensystems.com>
> ---
>  content.tex | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index d989d98..0d98926 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -2990,6 +2990,8 @@ Device ID  &  Virtio Device    \\
>  \hline
>  18         &   Input device \\
>  \hline
> +19         &   Signal Distribution Module \\
> +\hline

Please use a higher number, 19 is already proposed for virtio-vsock:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/201603/msg00042.html

> @@ -5641,6 +5643,8 @@ descriptor for the \field{sense_len}, \field{residual},
>  \field{status_qualifier}, \field{status}, \field{response} and
>  \field{sense} fields.
>  
> +\input{virtio-sdm.tex}

Please move this to the patch that adds virtio-sdm.tex.  Each patch must
be self-contained and build successfully.
Christian Pinto June 24, 2016, 12:45 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello Stefan,

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:03:13PM +0200, Christian Pinto wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Pinto <c.pinto@virtualopensystems.com>
> > ---
> >  content.tex | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> > index d989d98..0d98926 100644
> > --- a/content.tex
> > +++ b/content.tex
> > @@ -2990,6 +2990,8 @@ Device ID  &  Virtio Device    \\
> >  \hline
> >  18         &   Input device \\
> >  \hline
> > +19         &   Signal Distribution Module \\
> > +\hline
>
> Please use a higher number, 19 is already proposed for virtio-vsock:
> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/201603/msg00042.html


Thanks, I will use 20 then.


>
>
> > @@ -5641,6 +5643,8 @@ descriptor for the \field{sense_len},
> \field{residual},
> >  \field{status_qualifier}, \field{status}, \field{response} and
> >  \field{sense} fields.
> >
> > +\input{virtio-sdm.tex}
>
> Please move this to the patch that adds virtio-sdm.tex.  Each patch must
> be self-contained and build successfully.
>

Right, I will add this change to the patch adding the device specification
text.


Best,

Christian
Cornelia Huck June 24, 2016, 1:04 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:45:29 +0200
Christian Pinto <c.pinto@virtualopensystems.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:03:13PM +0200, Christian Pinto wrote:

> > > @@ -2990,6 +2990,8 @@ Device ID  &  Virtio Device    \\
> > >  \hline
> > >  18         &   Input device \\
> > >  \hline
> > > +19         &   Signal Distribution Module \\
> > > +\hline
> >
> > Please use a higher number, 19 is already proposed for virtio-vsock:
> > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/201603/msg00042.html
> 
> 
> Thanks, I will use 20 then.

I think virtio-crypto already wants to use 20. We sadly have a bit of a
backlog...
Christian Pinto June 24, 2016, 2:08 p.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:45:29 +0200
> Christian Pinto <c.pinto@virtualopensystems.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:03:13PM +0200, Christian Pinto wrote:
>
> > > > @@ -2990,6 +2990,8 @@ Device ID  &  Virtio Device    \\
> > > >  \hline
> > > >  18         &   Input device \\
> > > >  \hline
> > > > +19         &   Signal Distribution Module \\
> > > > +\hline
> > >
> > > Please use a higher number, 19 is already proposed for virtio-vsock:
> > > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/201603/msg00042.html
> >
> >
> > Thanks, I will use 20 then.
>
> I think virtio-crypto already wants to use 20. We sadly have a bit of a
> backlog...
>

Thanks Cornelia,

I'll use another number.

BTW, Is there a way to know which one is the first free device ID? I was
not following virtio-dev before, so not aware of all the pending device
specs.

Thanks,

Christian
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
index d989d98..0d98926 100644
--- a/content.tex
+++ b/content.tex
@@ -2990,6 +2990,8 @@  Device ID  &  Virtio Device    \\
 \hline
 18         &   Input device \\
 \hline
+19         &   Signal Distribution Module \\
+\hline
 \end{tabular}
 
 Some of the devices above are unspecified by this document,
@@ -5641,6 +5643,8 @@  descriptor for the \field{sense_len}, \field{residual},
 \field{status_qualifier}, \field{status}, \field{response} and
 \field{sense} fields.
 
+\input{virtio-sdm.tex}
+
 \chapter{Reserved Feature Bits}\label{sec:Reserved Feature Bits}
 
 Currently there are three device-independent feature bits defined: