diff mbox

[2/2] Add edge predictions pruning

Message ID 94e15a58-4e9e-0957-111f-e80d57988717@suse.cz
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Martin Liška June 9, 2016, 11:24 a.m. UTC
On 06/08/2016 02:41 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Adding hash for this prupose is bit of an overkill (there are
> definitly cheaper ways of solving so), but it will hardly affect compile
> time, so the pathc is OK.
> 
> Thanks,
> Honza

Hi

Sending the final version where I added comments and I also changed
dump scanning to cover the new dump format.

Martin

Comments

Jan-Benedict Glaw June 12, 2016, 11:55 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Martin,

On Thu, 2016-06-09 13:24:10 +0200, Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
> On 06/08/2016 02:41 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Adding hash for this prupose is bit of an overkill (there are
> > definitly cheaper ways of solving so), but it will hardly affect compile
> > time, so the pathc is OK.
> 
> Sending the final version where I added comments and I also changed
> dump scanning to cover the new dump format.

I just noticed a build problem my Build Robot found
(http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=569576):

g++ -fno-PIE -c   -g -O2 -DIN_GCC  -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE   -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/. -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/../include -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include  -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace   -o predict.o -MT predict.o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/predict.TPo /scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/predict.c
/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/predict.c:62:3: error: redeclaration of ‘NONE’
   NONE,
   ^
In file included from ./options.h:8:0,
                 from ./tm.h:16,
                 from /scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/backend.h:28,
                 from /scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/predict.c:33:
/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/config/msp430/msp430-opts.h:25:3: note: previous declaration ‘msp430_hwmult_types NONE’
   NONE,
   ^
/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/predict.c:743:23: error: could not convert ‘NONE’ from ‘msp430_hwmult_types’ to ‘predictor_reason’
    edge ep_edge = NULL)
                       ^
/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/predict.c: In function ‘void combine_predictions_for_insn(rtx_insn*, basic_block)’:
/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/predict.c:863:32: error: cannot convert ‘msp430_hwmult_types’ to ‘predictor_reason’ for argument ‘5’ to ‘void dump_prediction(FILE*, br_predictor, int, basic_block, predictor_reason, edge)’
        combined_probability, bb);
                                ^
/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/predict.c:867:36: warning: enumeral mismatch in conditional expression: ‘msp430_hwmult_types’ vs ‘predictor_reason’ [-Wenum-compare]
          bb, !first_match ? NONE : IGNORED);
                                    ^
[...]


The new `NONE' from your enum clashes with a NONE used in a MSP430
private enum.

MfG, JBG
Jan Hubicka June 13, 2016, 8:46 a.m. UTC | #2
> Hi Martin,
> 
> On Thu, 2016-06-09 13:24:10 +0200, Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
> > On 06/08/2016 02:41 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > Adding hash for this prupose is bit of an overkill (there are
> > > definitly cheaper ways of solving so), but it will hardly affect compile
> > > time, so the pathc is OK.
> > 
> > Sending the final version where I added comments and I also changed
> > dump scanning to cover the new dump format.
> 
> I just noticed a build problem my Build Robot found
> (http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=569576):
> 
> g++ -fno-PIE -c   -g -O2 -DIN_GCC  -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE   -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/. -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/../include -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include  -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber -I/scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace   -o predict.o -MT predict.o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/predict.TPo /scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/predict.c
> /scratch/4/jbglaw/regular/repos/gcc/gcc/predict.c:62:3: error: redeclaration of ‘NONE’
>    NONE,

Hmm, namespace conflict.  I guess renaming enum items to REASON_* should solve it easily.
Or we can add a namespace.

Martin, both variants of fix are pre-approved.
Honza
Martin Liška June 13, 2016, 10 a.m. UTC | #3
On 06/13/2016 10:46 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hmm, namespace conflict.  I guess renaming enum items to REASON_* should solve it easily.
> Or we can add a namespace.
> 
> Martin, both variants of fix are pre-approved.
> Honza

OK, I've just installed (r237370) a patch that prefixes all enum values.

Martin
diff mbox

Patch

From f83a515c952f3f17b45c757a3a84761d95959a39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin <mliska@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 17:29:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Add edge predictions pruning

contrib/ChangeLog:

2016-06-01  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>

	* analyze_brprob.py: Cover new dump output format.

gcc/ChangeLog:

2016-06-01  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>

	* predict.c (dump_prediction): Add new argument.
	(enum predictor_reason): New enum.
	(struct predictor_hash): New struct.
	(predictor_hash::hash): New function.
	(predictor_hash::equal): Likewise.
	(not_removed_prediction_p): New function.
	(prune_predictions_for_bb): Likewise.
	(combine_predictions_for_bb): Prune predictions.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2016-06-08  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>

	* g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-1.C: Scan for a new dump format.
	* g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-2.C: Likewise.
	* g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-3.C: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/predict-1.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/predict-2.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/predict-3.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/predict-4.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/predict-5.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/predict-6.c: Likewise.
	* gcc.dg/predict-7.c: Likewise.
---
 contrib/analyze_brprob.py                  |  10 +-
 gcc/predict.c                              | 184 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-1.C |   4 +-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-2.C |   4 +-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-3.C |   4 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-1.c           |   2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-2.c           |   2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-3.c           |   2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-4.c           |   2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-5.c           |   2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-6.c           |   2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-7.c           |   2 +-
 12 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/analyze_brprob.py b/contrib/analyze_brprob.py
index 36371ff..9416eed 100755
--- a/contrib/analyze_brprob.py
+++ b/contrib/analyze_brprob.py
@@ -122,14 +122,14 @@  if len(sys.argv) != 2:
     exit(1)
 
 profile = Profile(sys.argv[1])
-r = re.compile('  (.*) heuristics: (.*)%.*exec ([0-9]*) hit ([0-9]*)')
+r = re.compile('  (.*) heuristics( of edge [0-9]*->[0-9]*)?( \\(.*\\))?: (.*)%.*exec ([0-9]*) hit ([0-9]*)')
 for l in open(profile.filename).readlines():
     m = r.match(l)
-    if m != None:
+    if m != None and m.group(3) == None:
         name = m.group(1)
-        prediction = float(m.group(2))
-        count = int(m.group(3))
-        hits = int(m.group(4))
+        prediction = float(m.group(4))
+        count = int(m.group(5))
+        hits = int(m.group(6))
 
         profile.add(name, prediction, count, hits)
 
diff --git a/gcc/predict.c b/gcc/predict.c
index e058793..a61e01c 100644
--- a/gcc/predict.c
+++ b/gcc/predict.c
@@ -55,13 +55,29 @@  along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
 #include "tree-ssa-loop.h"
 #include "tree-scalar-evolution.h"
 
+/* Enum with reasons why a predictor is ignored.  */
+
+enum predictor_reason
+{
+  NONE,
+  IGNORED,
+  SINGLE_EDGE_DUPLICATE,
+  EDGE_PAIR_DUPLICATE
+};
+
+/* String messages for the aforementioned enum.  */
+
+static const char *reason_messages[] = {"", " (ignored)",
+    " (single edge duplicate)", " (edge pair duplicate)"};
+
 /* real constants: 0, 1, 1-1/REG_BR_PROB_BASE, REG_BR_PROB_BASE,
 		   1/REG_BR_PROB_BASE, 0.5, BB_FREQ_MAX.  */
 static sreal real_almost_one, real_br_prob_base,
 	     real_inv_br_prob_base, real_one_half, real_bb_freq_max;
 
 static void combine_predictions_for_insn (rtx_insn *, basic_block);
-static void dump_prediction (FILE *, enum br_predictor, int, basic_block, int);
+static void dump_prediction (FILE *, enum br_predictor, int, basic_block,
+			     enum predictor_reason, edge);
 static void predict_paths_leading_to (basic_block, enum br_predictor, enum prediction);
 static void predict_paths_leading_to_edge (edge, enum br_predictor, enum prediction);
 static bool can_predict_insn_p (const rtx_insn *);
@@ -723,21 +739,31 @@  invert_br_probabilities (rtx insn)
 
 static void
 dump_prediction (FILE *file, enum br_predictor predictor, int probability,
-		 basic_block bb, int used)
+		 basic_block bb, enum predictor_reason reason = NONE,
+		 edge ep_edge = NULL)
 {
-  edge e;
+  edge e = ep_edge;
   edge_iterator ei;
 
   if (!file)
     return;
 
-  FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->succs)
-    if (! (e->flags & EDGE_FALLTHRU))
-      break;
+  if (e == NULL)
+    FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->succs)
+      if (! (e->flags & EDGE_FALLTHRU))
+	break;
+
+  char edge_info_str[128];
+  if (ep_edge)
+    sprintf (edge_info_str, " of edge %d->%d", ep_edge->src->index,
+	     ep_edge->dest->index);
+  else
+    edge_info_str[0] = '\0';
 
-  fprintf (file, "  %s heuristics%s: %.1f%%",
+  fprintf (file, "  %s heuristics%s%s: %.1f%%",
 	   predictor_info[predictor].name,
-	   used ? "" : " (ignored)", probability * 100.0 / REG_BR_PROB_BASE);
+	   edge_info_str, reason_messages[reason],
+	   probability * 100.0 / REG_BR_PROB_BASE);
 
   if (bb->count)
     {
@@ -834,18 +860,18 @@  combine_predictions_for_insn (rtx_insn *insn, basic_block bb)
 
   if (!found)
     dump_prediction (dump_file, PRED_NO_PREDICTION,
-		     combined_probability, bb, true);
+		     combined_probability, bb);
   else
     {
       dump_prediction (dump_file, PRED_DS_THEORY, combined_probability,
-		       bb, !first_match);
+		       bb, !first_match ? NONE : IGNORED);
       dump_prediction (dump_file, PRED_FIRST_MATCH, best_probability,
-		       bb, first_match);
+		       bb, first_match ? NONE: IGNORED);
     }
 
   if (first_match)
     combined_probability = best_probability;
-  dump_prediction (dump_file, PRED_COMBINED, combined_probability, bb, true);
+  dump_prediction (dump_file, PRED_COMBINED, combined_probability, bb);
 
   while (*pnote)
     {
@@ -856,7 +882,8 @@  combine_predictions_for_insn (rtx_insn *insn, basic_block bb)
 	  int probability = INTVAL (XEXP (XEXP (*pnote, 0), 1));
 
 	  dump_prediction (dump_file, predictor, probability, bb,
-			   !first_match || best_predictor == predictor);
+			   (!first_match || best_predictor == predictor)
+			   ? NONE : IGNORED);
 	  *pnote = XEXP (*pnote, 1);
 	}
       else
@@ -887,6 +914,121 @@  combine_predictions_for_insn (rtx_insn *insn, basic_block bb)
     single_succ_edge (bb)->probability = REG_BR_PROB_BASE;
 }
 
+/* Edge prediction hash traits.  */
+
+struct predictor_hash: pointer_hash <edge_prediction>
+{
+
+  static inline hashval_t hash (const edge_prediction *);
+  static inline bool equal (const edge_prediction *, const edge_prediction *);
+};
+
+/* Calculate hash value of an edge prediction P based on predictor and
+   normalized probability.  */
+
+inline hashval_t
+predictor_hash::hash (const edge_prediction *p)
+{
+  inchash::hash hstate;
+  hstate.add_int (p->ep_predictor);
+
+  int prob = p->ep_probability;
+  if (prob > REG_BR_PROB_BASE / 2)
+    prob = REG_BR_PROB_BASE - prob;
+
+  hstate.add_int (prob);
+
+  return hstate.end ();
+}
+
+/* Return true whether edge predictions P1 and P2 use the same predictor and
+   have equal (or opposed probability).  */
+
+inline bool
+predictor_hash::equal (const edge_prediction *p1, const edge_prediction *p2)
+{
+  return (p1->ep_predictor == p2->ep_predictor
+	  && (p1->ep_probability == p2->ep_probability
+	      || p1->ep_probability == REG_BR_PROB_BASE - p2->ep_probability));
+}
+
+struct predictor_hash_traits: predictor_hash,
+  typed_noop_remove <edge_prediction *> {};
+
+/* Return true if edge prediction P is not in DATA hash set.  */
+
+static bool
+not_removed_prediction_p (edge_prediction *p, void *data)
+{
+  hash_set<edge_prediction *> *remove = (hash_set<edge_prediction *> *) data;
+  return !remove->contains (p);
+}
+
+/* Prune predictions for a basic block BB.  Currently we do following
+   clean-up steps:
+
+   1) remove duplicate prediction that is guessed with the same probability
+      (different than 1/2) to both edge
+   2) remove duplicates for a prediction that belongs with the same probability
+      to a single edge
+
+  */
+
+static void
+prune_predictions_for_bb (basic_block bb)
+{
+  edge_prediction **preds = bb_predictions->get (bb);
+
+  if (preds)
+    {
+      hash_table <predictor_hash_traits> s (13);
+      hash_set <edge_prediction *> remove;
+
+      /* Step 1: identify predictors that should be removed.  */
+      for (edge_prediction *pred = *preds; pred; pred = pred->ep_next)
+	{
+	  edge_prediction *existing = s.find (pred);
+	  if (existing)
+	    {
+	      if (pred->ep_edge == existing->ep_edge
+		  && pred->ep_probability == existing->ep_probability)
+		{
+		  /* Remove a duplicate predictor.  */
+		  dump_prediction (dump_file, pred->ep_predictor,
+				   pred->ep_probability, bb,
+				   SINGLE_EDGE_DUPLICATE, pred->ep_edge);
+
+		  remove.add (pred);
+		}
+	      else if (pred->ep_edge != existing->ep_edge
+		       && pred->ep_probability == existing->ep_probability
+		       && pred->ep_probability != REG_BR_PROB_BASE / 2)
+		{
+		  /* Remove both predictors as they predict the same
+		     for both edges.  */
+		  dump_prediction (dump_file, existing->ep_predictor,
+				   pred->ep_probability, bb,
+				   EDGE_PAIR_DUPLICATE,
+				   existing->ep_edge);
+		  dump_prediction (dump_file, pred->ep_predictor,
+				   pred->ep_probability, bb,
+				   EDGE_PAIR_DUPLICATE,
+				   pred->ep_edge);
+
+		  remove.add (existing);
+		  remove.add (pred);
+		}
+	    }
+
+	  edge_prediction **slot2 = s.find_slot (pred, INSERT);
+	  *slot2 = pred;
+	}
+
+      /* Step 2: Remove predictors.  */
+      filter_predictions (preds, not_removed_prediction_p, &remove);
+    }
+}
+
 /* Combine predictions into single probability and store them into CFG.
    Remove now useless prediction entries.
    If DRY_RUN is set, only produce dumps and do not modify profile.  */
@@ -935,7 +1077,10 @@  combine_predictions_for_bb (basic_block bb, bool dry_run)
   if (dump_file)
     fprintf (dump_file, "Predictions for bb %i\n", bb->index);
 
+  prune_predictions_for_bb (bb);
+
   edge_prediction **preds = bb_predictions->get (bb);
+
   if (preds)
     {
       /* We implement "first match" heuristics and use probability guessed
@@ -1001,18 +1146,18 @@  combine_predictions_for_bb (basic_block bb, bool dry_run)
     first_match = true;
 
   if (!found)
-    dump_prediction (dump_file, PRED_NO_PREDICTION, combined_probability, bb, true);
+    dump_prediction (dump_file, PRED_NO_PREDICTION, combined_probability, bb);
   else
     {
       dump_prediction (dump_file, PRED_DS_THEORY, combined_probability, bb,
-		       !first_match);
+		       !first_match ? NONE : IGNORED);
       dump_prediction (dump_file, PRED_FIRST_MATCH, best_probability, bb,
-		       first_match);
+		       first_match ? NONE : IGNORED);
     }
 
   if (first_match)
     combined_probability = best_probability;
-  dump_prediction (dump_file, PRED_COMBINED, combined_probability, bb, true);
+  dump_prediction (dump_file, PRED_COMBINED, combined_probability, bb);
 
   if (preds)
     {
@@ -1021,10 +1166,9 @@  combine_predictions_for_bb (basic_block bb, bool dry_run)
 	  enum br_predictor predictor = pred->ep_predictor;
 	  int probability = pred->ep_probability;
 
-	  if (pred->ep_edge != EDGE_SUCC (bb, 0))
-	    probability = REG_BR_PROB_BASE - probability;
 	  dump_prediction (dump_file, predictor, probability, bb,
-			   !first_match || best_predictor == predictor);
+			   (!first_match || best_predictor == predictor)
+			   ? NONE : IGNORED, pred->ep_edge);
 	}
     }
   clear_bb_predictions (bb);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-1.C
index 357397f..88262eb 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-1.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-1.C
@@ -9,5 +9,5 @@  void test() {
   return;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "extra loop exit heuristics:" 2 "profile_estimate"} } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop exit heuristics:" 3 "profile_estimate"} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "extra loop exit heuristics of edge\[^:\]*:" 2 "profile_estimate"} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop exit heuristics of edge\[^:\]*:" 3 "profile_estimate"} } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-2.C
index 172fab1..15e9866 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-2.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-2.C
@@ -9,5 +9,5 @@  void test() {
   return;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "extra loop exit heuristics:" 1 "profile_estimate"} } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop exit heuristics:" 2 "profile_estimate"} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "extra loop exit heuristics of edge\[^:\]*:" 1 "profile_estimate"} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop exit heuristics of edge\[^:\]*:" 2 "profile_estimate"} } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-3.C
index e6ceec8..61af84b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-3.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/predict-loop-exit-3.C
@@ -9,5 +9,5 @@  void test() {
   return;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "extra loop exit heuristics:" 2 "profile_estimate"} } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop exit heuristics:" 3 "profile_estimate"} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "extra loop exit heuristics of edge\[^:\]*:" 2 "profile_estimate"} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop exit heuristics of edge\[^:\]*:" 3 "profile_estimate"} } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-1.c
index 94f6b019..d0924f2 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-1.c
@@ -23,4 +23,4 @@  void foo (int bound)
     }
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop iv compare heuristics: 2.0%" 5 "profile_estimate"} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop iv compare heuristics of edge\[^:\]*: 2.0%" 5 "profile_estimate"} } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-2.c
index f2fc49d..3011686 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-2.c
@@ -23,4 +23,4 @@  void foo (int base, int bound)
     }
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "loop iv compare heuristics" "profile_estimate"} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "loop iv compare heuristics of edge\[^:\]*:" "profile_estimate"} } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-3.c
index 08db59a..6768c36 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-3.c
@@ -25,4 +25,4 @@  void foo (int bound)
     }
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop iv compare heuristics: 98.0%" 3 "profile_estimate"} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop iv compare heuristics of edge\[^:\]*:: 98.0%" 3 "profile_estimate"} } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-4.c
index 3e7fb74..5779da3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-4.c
@@ -15,4 +15,4 @@  void foo (int bound)
     }
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "loop iv compare heuristics: 50.0%" "profile_estimate"} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "loop iv compare heuristics of edge\[^:\]*: 50.0%" "profile_estimate"} } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-5.c
index 32178a8..56ada30 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-5.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-5.c
@@ -21,4 +21,4 @@  void foo (int base, int bound)
     }
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop iv compare heuristics: 98.0%" 4 "profile_estimate"} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop iv compare heuristics of edge\[^:\]*: 98.0%" 4 "profile_estimate"} } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-6.c
index 16ad16f..9ed41ed 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-6.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-6.c
@@ -21,4 +21,4 @@  void foo (int base, int bound)
     }
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop iv compare heuristics: 2.0%" 4 "profile_estimate"} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop iv compare heuristics of edge\[^:\]*: 2.0%" 4 "profile_estimate"} } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-7.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-7.c
index a0ea37b..fe34ca5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-7.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/predict-7.c
@@ -13,4 +13,4 @@  void foo (int base)
       bar (i);
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop branch heuristics" 0 "profile_estimate"} } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "loop branch heuristics of edge\[^:\]*" 0 "profile_estimate"} } */
-- 
2.8.3