diff mbox

[wwwdocs,AArch64] Mention -mcpu=qdf24xx support for GCC 6

Message ID 575048B3.8020906@foss.arm.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Kyrill Tkachov June 2, 2016, 2:54 p.m. UTC 
Hi all,

As discussed some time ago with Jim, here's the AArch64 note mentioning the support for Qualcomm QDF24xx
that was added in GCC 6.

Ok to commit?

Thanks,
Kyrill

Comments

James Greenhalgh June 2, 2016, 4:24 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 03:54:43PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> As discussed some time ago with Jim, here's the AArch64 note mentioning the
> support for Qualcomm QDF24xx that was added in GCC 6.
> 
> Ok to commit?

OK.

Thanks,
James

> Index: htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.82
> diff -U 3 -r1.82 changes.html
> --- htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html	31 May 2016 08:01:35 -0000	1.82
> +++ htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html	2 Jun 2016 14:44:02 -0000
> @@ -435,6 +435,11 @@
>         options as well as the equivalent target attributes and pragmas.
>       </li>
>       <li>
> +       The Qualcomm QDF24xx processor is now supported via the
> +       <code>-mcpu=qdf24xx</code> and <code>-mtune=qdf24xx</code>
> +       options as well as the equivalent target attributes and pragmas.
> +     </li>
> +     <li>
>         Code generation for the ARM Cortex-A57 processor is improved.
>         Among general code generation improvements, a better algorithm is
>         added for allocating registers to floating-point multiply-accumulate
Evandro Menezes June 3, 2016, 8:32 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 06/02/16 09:54, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> The Qualcomm QDF24xx processor is now supported via the

Shouldn't this read "The Qualcomm QDF24xx processors are now supported 
via the"?

Not that I have a strong opinion about it, but, otherwise, OK.
Kyrill Tkachov June 9, 2016, 8:43 a.m. UTC | #3 
Hi Evandro,

On 03/06/16 21:32, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> On 06/02/16 09:54, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>> The Qualcomm QDF24xx processor is now supported via the
>
> Shouldn't this read "The Qualcomm QDF24xx processors are now supported via the"?
>
> Not that I have a strong opinion about it, but, otherwise, OK.
>

I used Jim's suggestion at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg01423.html.
I don't have a strong opinion on it either.
If Jim objects to the wording I'm happy to change it.

Kyrill
Jim Wilson June 9, 2016, 2:52 p.m. UTC | #4 
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
<kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com> wrote:
> On 03/06/16 21:32, Evandro Menezes wrote:
>> Shouldn't this read "The Qualcomm QDF24xx processors are now supported via
>> the"?
>>
> I used Jim's suggestion at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg01423.html.
> I don't have a strong opinion on it either.
> If Jim objects to the wording I'm happy to change it.

I don't have a strong opinion either.  The option was named qdf24xx in
anticipation that there might be more than one closely related part,
but currently there are zero of them, as nothing has been released
yet.

Jim
diff mbox

Patch

Index: htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.82
diff -U 3 -r1.82 changes.html
--- htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html	31 May 2016 08:01:35 -0000	1.82
+++ htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html	2 Jun 2016 14:44:02 -0000
@@ -435,6 +435,11 @@ 
        options as well as the equivalent target attributes and pragmas.
      </li>
      <li>
+       The Qualcomm QDF24xx processor is now supported via the
+       <code>-mcpu=qdf24xx</code> and <code>-mtune=qdf24xx</code>
+       options as well as the equivalent target attributes and pragmas.
+     </li>
+     <li>
        Code generation for the ARM Cortex-A57 processor is improved.
        Among general code generation improvements, a better algorithm is
        added for allocating registers to floating-point multiply-accumulate