@@ -1795,27 +1795,8 @@ vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
else if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
err = 0;
- if (copied > 0) {
- /* We only do these additional bookkeeping/notification steps
- * if we actually copied something out of the queue pair
- * instead of just peeking ahead.
- */
-
- if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
- /* If the other side has shutdown for sending and there
- * is nothing more to read, then modify the socket
- * state.
- */
- if (vsk->peer_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN) {
- if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) <= 0) {
- sk->sk_state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
- sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE);
- sk->sk_state_change(sk);
- }
- }
- }
+ if (copied > 0)
err = copied;
- }
out_wait:
finish_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait);
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled VSOCK: do not disconnect socket when peer has shutdown SEND only to the linux-4.2.y-queue branch of the 4.2.y-ckt extended stable tree which can be found at: https://git.launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel/linux/+git/linux-stable-ckt/log/?h=linux-4.2.y-queue This patch is scheduled to be released in version 4.2.8-ckt11. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please reply to this email. For more information about the 4.2.y-ckt tree, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable Thanks. -Kamal ---8<------------------------------------------------------------ From 89cf2ec58bee58f349e0cf4c1b77dc53490e6949 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@docker.com> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 14:21:53 +0100 Subject: VSOCK: do not disconnect socket when peer has shutdown SEND only [ Upstream commit dedc58e067d8c379a15a8a183c5db318201295bb ] The peer may be expecting a reply having sent a request and then done a shutdown(SHUT_WR), so tearing down the whole socket at this point seems wrong and breaks for me with a client which does a SHUT_WR. Looking at other socket family's stream_recvmsg callbacks doing a shutdown here does not seem to be the norm and removing it does not seem to have had any adverse effects that I can see. I'm using Stefan's RFC virtio transport patches, I'm unsure of the impact on the vmci transport. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@docker.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Andy King <acking@vmware.com> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com> Cc: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com> Cc: Adit Ranadive <aditr@vmware.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> --- net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 21 +-------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4