diff mbox

[PR,sanitizer/64354] Define __SANITIZE_THREAD__ and __SANITIZE_UNDEFINED__ macros if corresponding switches are enabled.

Message ID 573DA810.9090308@samsung.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Maxim Ostapenko May 19, 2016, 11:48 a.m. UTC
On 18/05/16 20:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:33:53PM +0300, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
>> when compiling with -fsanitize=address we define __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__
>> macros, but we don't do this for -fsanitize=thread and -fsanitize=undefined.
>> Perhaps we should be more symmetric here and define corresponding
>> __SANITIZE_THREAD__ and __SANITIZE_UNDEFINED__ macros respectively?
>>
>> I added two simple test cases to c-c++-common/{ub, t}san/ directories that
>> just verify if __SANITIZE_THREAD__ (__SANITIZE_UNDEFINED__) is defined. Is
>> that a proper way how we check that the macros defined correctly? Does this
>> patch looks reasonable?
> I can understand __SANITIZE_THREAD__, but I fail to see what
> __SANITIZE_UNDEFINED__ would be good for, especially when it is not just
> a single sanitizer, but dozens of them.

Ok, I've removed -fsanitize=undefined part from this patch, is it OK 
now? As for UBSan, perhaps it's not desirable to define separate macros 
for each -fsanitize={null, ...} switch.

>
> 	Jakub
>
>

Comments

Jakub Jelinek May 19, 2016, 11:49 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 02:48:32PM +0300, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> On 18/05/16 20:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 08:33:53PM +0300, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> >>when compiling with -fsanitize=address we define __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__
> >>macros, but we don't do this for -fsanitize=thread and -fsanitize=undefined.
> >>Perhaps we should be more symmetric here and define corresponding
> >>__SANITIZE_THREAD__ and __SANITIZE_UNDEFINED__ macros respectively?
> >>
> >>I added two simple test cases to c-c++-common/{ub, t}san/ directories that
> >>just verify if __SANITIZE_THREAD__ (__SANITIZE_UNDEFINED__) is defined. Is
> >>that a proper way how we check that the macros defined correctly? Does this
> >>patch looks reasonable?
> >I can understand __SANITIZE_THREAD__, but I fail to see what
> >__SANITIZE_UNDEFINED__ would be good for, especially when it is not just
> >a single sanitizer, but dozens of them.
> 
> Ok, I've removed -fsanitize=undefined part from this patch, is it OK now? As
> for UBSan, perhaps it's not desirable to define separate macros for each
> -fsanitize={null, ...} switch.
> 
> >
> >	Jakub
> >
> >
> 

> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2016-05-19  Maxim Ostapenko  <m.ostapenko@samsung.com>
> 
> 	PR sanitizer/64354
> 	* cppbuiltin.c (define_builtin_macros_for_compilation_flags): Add new
> 	builtin __SANITIZE_THREAD__ macros for fsanitize=thread switch.
> 	* doc/cpp.texi: Document new macros.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2016-05-19  Maxim Ostapenko  <m.ostapenko@samsung.com>
> 
> 	PR sanitizer/64354
> 	* c-c++-common/tsan/sanitize-thread-macro.c: New test.

Ok.

	Jakub
diff mbox

Patch

gcc/ChangeLog:

2016-05-19  Maxim Ostapenko  <m.ostapenko@samsung.com>

	PR sanitizer/64354
	* cppbuiltin.c (define_builtin_macros_for_compilation_flags): Add new
	builtin __SANITIZE_THREAD__ macros for fsanitize=thread switch.
	* doc/cpp.texi: Document new macros.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2016-05-19  Maxim Ostapenko  <m.ostapenko@samsung.com>

	PR sanitizer/64354
	* c-c++-common/tsan/sanitize-thread-macro.c: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/cppbuiltin.c b/gcc/cppbuiltin.c
index 6d494ad..69ccdb9 100644
--- a/gcc/cppbuiltin.c
+++ b/gcc/cppbuiltin.c
@@ -92,6 +92,9 @@  define_builtin_macros_for_compilation_flags (cpp_reader *pfile)
   if (flag_sanitize & SANITIZE_ADDRESS)
     cpp_define (pfile, "__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__");
 
+  if (flag_sanitize & SANITIZE_THREAD)
+    cpp_define (pfile, "__SANITIZE_THREAD__");
+
   if (optimize_size)
     cpp_define (pfile, "__OPTIMIZE_SIZE__");
   if (optimize)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/cpp.texi b/gcc/doc/cpp.texi
index 9f914b2..44f59bd 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/cpp.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/cpp.texi
@@ -2362,6 +2362,9 @@  in use.
 This macro is defined, with value 1, when @option{-fsanitize=address}
 or @option{-fsanitize=kernel-address} are in use.
 
+@item __SANITIZE_THREAD__
+This macro is defined, with value 1, when @option{-fsanitize=thread} is in use.
+
 @item __TIMESTAMP__
 This macro expands to a string constant that describes the date and time
 of the last modification of the current source file. The string constant
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tsan/sanitize-thread-macro.c b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tsan/sanitize-thread-macro.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2b8a840
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tsan/sanitize-thread-macro.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ 
+/* Check that -fsanitize=thread options defines __SANITIZE_THREAD__ macros.  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "*" } { "-O0" } } */
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+#ifndef __SANITIZE_THREAD__
+  bad construction
+#endif
+  return 0;
+}