Message ID | 20160514190410.GA2283@codeblueprint.co.uk |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Sat, 14 May 2016, Matt Fleming wrote: > Folks, > > Please pull the following branch which contains support for Xen on ARM > EFI platforms. > > This merge includes a merge of Stefano's xen/linux-next branch to pull > in the prerequisites required for Shannon's commit: > > 11ee5491e5ff ("Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI") > > as it needs both the latest changes in the EFI 'next' branch (now > tip/efi/core) and xen/linux-next. > > I have intentionally not included the individual patches as I would > normally do in a pull request, so that commit history created by my > merging of Stefano's branch is preserved, and so that there's no way > to accidentally apply the patches individually. > > The following changes since commit 6c5450ef66816216e574885cf8d3ddb31ef77428: > > efivarfs: Make efivarfs_file_ioctl() static (2016-05-07 07:06:13 +0200) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi.git efi/arm-xen > > for you to fetch changes up to 11ee5491e5ff519e0d3a7018eb21351cb6955a98: > > Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI (2016-05-14 19:31:01 +0100) Is this arrangement working for everybody, in particular the tip maintainers? I am asking because I didn't receive any replies to this or to http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146317737928595&w=2. > David Vrabel (1): > xen/gntdev: reduce copy batch size to 16 > > Matt Fleming (1): > Merge branch 'xen/linux-next' into efi/arm-xen > > Shannon Zhao (16): > Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen > xen/grant-table: Move xlated_setup_gnttab_pages to common place > Xen: xlate: Use page_to_xen_pfn instead of page_to_pfn > arm/xen: Use xen_xlate_map_ballooned_pages to setup grant table > xen: memory : Add new XENMAPSPACE type XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio > Xen: ARM: Add support for mapping platform device mmio > Xen: ARM: Add support for mapping AMBA device mmio > Xen: public/hvm: sync changes of HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_VIA ABI from Xen > xen/hvm/params: Add a new delivery type for event-channel in HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ > arm/xen: Get event-channel irq through HVM_PARAM when booting with ACPI > ARM: XEN: Move xen_early_init() before efi_init() > ARM: Xen: Document UEFI support on Xen ARM virtual platforms > XEN: EFI: Move x86 specific codes to architecture directory > ARM64: XEN: Add a function to initialize Xen specific UEFI runtime services > FDT: Add a helper to get the subnode by given name > Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI > > Stefano Stabellini (1): > xen/x86: don't lose event interrupts > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt | 35 +++++ > arch/arm/include/asm/xen/xen-ops.h | 6 + > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/xen/Makefile | 1 + > arch/arm/xen/efi.c | 40 ++++++ > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 125 ++++++++++++---- > arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/xen-ops.h | 6 + > arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 2 +- > arch/arm64/xen/Makefile | 1 + > arch/x86/xen/efi.c | 111 +++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/xen/grant-table.c | 57 +------- > arch/x86/xen/time.c | 6 +- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 74 ++++++++++ > drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c | 5 + > drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 81 ++++++++--- > drivers/of/fdt.c | 13 ++ > drivers/xen/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/xen/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/xen/arm-device.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/xen/efi.c | 173 +++++------------------ > drivers/xen/gntdev.c | 2 +- > drivers/xen/xlate_mmu.c | 77 ++++++++++ > include/linux/of_fdt.h | 2 + > include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h | 40 +++++- > include/xen/interface/memory.h | 1 + > include/xen/xen-ops.h | 32 +++-- > 26 files changed, 840 insertions(+), 251 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/xen/xen-ops.h > create mode 100644 arch/arm/xen/efi.c > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/xen/xen-ops.h > create mode 100644 drivers/xen/arm-device.c >
On 17/05/16 11:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Sat, 14 May 2016, Matt Fleming wrote: >> Folks, >> >> Please pull the following branch which contains support for Xen on ARM >> EFI platforms. >> >> This merge includes a merge of Stefano's xen/linux-next branch to pull >> in the prerequisites required for Shannon's commit: >> >> 11ee5491e5ff ("Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI") >> >> as it needs both the latest changes in the EFI 'next' branch (now >> tip/efi/core) and xen/linux-next. >> >> I have intentionally not included the individual patches as I would >> normally do in a pull request, so that commit history created by my >> merging of Stefano's branch is preserved, and so that there's no way >> to accidentally apply the patches individually. >> >> The following changes since commit 6c5450ef66816216e574885cf8d3ddb31ef77428: >> >> efivarfs: Make efivarfs_file_ioctl() static (2016-05-07 07:06:13 +0200) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi.git efi/arm-xen >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 11ee5491e5ff519e0d3a7018eb21351cb6955a98: >> >> Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI (2016-05-14 19:31:01 +0100) > > Is this arrangement working for everybody, in particular the tip > maintainers? Yes. David
On Tue, 17 May 2016, David Vrabel wrote: > On 17/05/16 11:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Sat, 14 May 2016, Matt Fleming wrote: > >> Folks, > >> > >> Please pull the following branch which contains support for Xen on ARM > >> EFI platforms. > >> > >> This merge includes a merge of Stefano's xen/linux-next branch to pull > >> in the prerequisites required for Shannon's commit: > >> > >> 11ee5491e5ff ("Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI") > >> > >> as it needs both the latest changes in the EFI 'next' branch (now > >> tip/efi/core) and xen/linux-next. > >> > >> I have intentionally not included the individual patches as I would > >> normally do in a pull request, so that commit history created by my > >> merging of Stefano's branch is preserved, and so that there's no way > >> to accidentally apply the patches individually. > >> > >> The following changes since commit 6c5450ef66816216e574885cf8d3ddb31ef77428: > >> > >> efivarfs: Make efivarfs_file_ioctl() static (2016-05-07 07:06:13 +0200) > >> > >> are available in the git repository at: > >> > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi.git efi/arm-xen > >> > >> for you to fetch changes up to 11ee5491e5ff519e0d3a7018eb21351cb6955a98: > >> > >> Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI (2016-05-14 19:31:01 +0100) > > > > Is this arrangement working for everybody, in particular the tip > > maintainers? > > Yes. I meant the x86 tip maintainers (Thomas, Peter and Ingo).
* Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2016, David Vrabel wrote: > > On 17/05/16 11:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > On Sat, 14 May 2016, Matt Fleming wrote: > > >> Folks, > > >> > > >> Please pull the following branch which contains support for Xen on ARM > > >> EFI platforms. > > >> > > >> This merge includes a merge of Stefano's xen/linux-next branch to pull > > >> in the prerequisites required for Shannon's commit: > > >> > > >> 11ee5491e5ff ("Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI") > > >> > > >> as it needs both the latest changes in the EFI 'next' branch (now > > >> tip/efi/core) and xen/linux-next. > > >> > > >> I have intentionally not included the individual patches as I would > > >> normally do in a pull request, so that commit history created by my > > >> merging of Stefano's branch is preserved, and so that there's no way > > >> to accidentally apply the patches individually. > > >> > > >> The following changes since commit 6c5450ef66816216e574885cf8d3ddb31ef77428: > > >> > > >> efivarfs: Make efivarfs_file_ioctl() static (2016-05-07 07:06:13 +0200) > > >> > > >> are available in the git repository at: > > >> > > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/efi.git efi/arm-xen > > >> > > >> for you to fetch changes up to 11ee5491e5ff519e0d3a7018eb21351cb6955a98: > > >> > > >> Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI (2016-05-14 19:31:01 +0100) > > > > > > Is this arrangement working for everybody, in particular the tip > > > maintainers? > > > > Yes. > > I meant the x86 tip maintainers (Thomas, Peter and Ingo). I have no particular objections, since this seems to be Xen-next merged to the EFI tree that is already upstream, plus this single commit on top of t: 11ee5491e5ff Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI Which, if Matt is fine with it, you could send to Linus too as part of this cycle's Xen pull request. Thanks, Ingo
On Wed, 18 May, at 12:46:38PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > I have no particular objections, since this seems to be Xen-next merged to the EFI > tree that is already upstream, plus this single commit on top of t: > > 11ee5491e5ff Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI > > Which, if Matt is fine with it, you could send to Linus too as part of this > cycle's Xen pull request. Sure, I'm fine with that.