@@ -98,7 +98,8 @@
* nla_put_u8(skb, type, value) add u8 attribute to skb
* nla_put_u16(skb, type, value) add u16 attribute to skb
* nla_put_u32(skb, type, value) add u32 attribute to skb
- * nla_put_u64(skb, type, value) add u64 attribute to skb
+ * nla_put_u64_64bits(skb, type,
+ * value, padattr) add u64 attribute to skb
* nla_put_s8(skb, type, value) add s8 attribute to skb
* nla_put_s16(skb, type, value) add s16 attribute to skb
* nla_put_s32(skb, type, value) add s32 attribute to skb
@@ -847,17 +848,6 @@ static inline int nla_put_le32(struct sk_buff *skb, int attrtype, __le32 value)
}
/**
- * nla_put_u64 - Add a u64 netlink attribute to a socket buffer
- * @skb: socket buffer to add attribute to
- * @attrtype: attribute type
- * @value: numeric value
- */
-static inline int nla_put_u64(struct sk_buff *skb, int attrtype, u64 value)
-{
- return nla_put(skb, attrtype, sizeof(u64), &value);
-}
-
-/**
* nla_put_u64_64bit - Add a u64 netlink attribute to a skb and align it
* @skb: socket buffer to add attribute to
* @attrtype: attribute type
This function is not used anymore. nla_put_u64_64bit() should be used instead. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com> --- I'm asking myself if it's better to rename nla_put_u64_64bit() to nla_put_u64(). Because there is a lot of users, the change will be huge, so I tend to say no. include/net/netlink.h | 14 ++------------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)