diff mbox

[v2] gpio: pca953x: Use correct u16 value for register word write

Message ID 1459320554-2455-1-git-send-email-sdliyong@gmail.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

LIYONG March 30, 2016, 6:49 a.m. UTC
The current implementation only uses the first byte in val,
the second byte is always 0. Change it to use cpu_to_le16
to write the two bytes into the register

Signed-off-by: Yong Li <sdliyong@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Phil Reid March 31, 2016, 3:28 a.m. UTC | #1
On 30/03/2016 2:49 PM, Yong Li wrote:
> The current implementation only uses the first byte in val,
> the second byte is always 0. Change it to use cpu_to_le16
> to write the two bytes into the register
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Li <sdliyong@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Phil Reid <preid@electromag.com.au>
> ---
>   drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> index d0d3065..e66084c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>   #include <linux/i2c.h>
>   #include <linux/platform_data/pca953x.h>
>   #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
>   #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>   #include <linux/acpi.h>
>
> @@ -159,7 +160,7 @@ static int pca953x_write_regs(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
>   		switch (chip->chip_type) {
>   		case PCA953X_TYPE:
>   			ret = i2c_smbus_write_word_data(chip->client,
> -							reg << 1, (u16) *val);
> +			    reg << 1, cpu_to_le16(get_unaligned((u16 *)val)));
>   			break;
>   		case PCA957X_TYPE:
>   			ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(chip->client, reg << 1,
>
Linus Walleij April 1, 2016, 12:51 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Yong Li <sdliyong@gmail.com> wrote:

> The current implementation only uses the first byte in val,
> the second byte is always 0. Change it to use cpu_to_le16
> to write the two bytes into the register
>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Li <sdliyong@gmail.com>

Patch applied to fixes with Phil's review tag.

It is a regression, right?

Should it be tagged for stable?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
LIYONG April 1, 2016, 2:38 p.m. UTC | #3
Yes it is a regression. I think it should be tagged for stable too

Thanks,
Yong

2016-04-01 20:51 GMT+08:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Yong Li <sdliyong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The current implementation only uses the first byte in val,
>> the second byte is always 0. Change it to use cpu_to_le16
>> to write the two bytes into the register
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yong Li <sdliyong@gmail.com>
>
> Patch applied to fixes with Phil's review tag.
>
> It is a regression, right?
>
> Should it be tagged for stable?
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
index d0d3065..e66084c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/i2c.h>
 #include <linux/platform_data/pca953x.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
 
@@ -159,7 +160,7 @@  static int pca953x_write_regs(struct pca953x_chip *chip, int reg, u8 *val)
 		switch (chip->chip_type) {
 		case PCA953X_TYPE:
 			ret = i2c_smbus_write_word_data(chip->client,
-							reg << 1, (u16) *val);
+			    reg << 1, cpu_to_le16(get_unaligned((u16 *)val)));
 			break;
 		case PCA957X_TYPE:
 			ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(chip->client, reg << 1,