| Message ID | 1459265351-19812-5-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | Hans de Goede |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/usb_phy.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/usb_phy.c index 0749fbd..204c807 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/usb_phy.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/usb_phy.c @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static struct sunxi_usb_phy { int id; int init_count; int power_on_count; - int base; + ulong base; } sunxi_usb_phy[] = { { .usb_rst_mask = CCM_USB_CTRL_PHY0_RST | CCM_USB_CTRL_PHY0_CLK, diff --git a/drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c index 7b33094..44d1a76 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_send_cmd(struct mmc *mmc, struct mmc_cmd *cmd, cmdval |= SUNXI_MMC_CMD_CHK_RESPONSE_CRC; if (data) { - if ((u32) data->dest & 0x3) { + if ((u32)(long)data->dest & 0x3) { error = -1; goto out; }
Some parts of the sunxi code cast explicitly between u32 values and pointers. This is not a problem in practice, because all 64bit SoCs today only use the lower 32 bits for their phyical address space. But we need to make sure that the compiler is sure this is not an accident as well. Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> --- arch/arm/mach-sunxi/usb_phy.c | 2 +- drivers/mmc/sunxi_mmc.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)