From patchwork Wed Jul 28 18:14:04 2010
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [C++] PR 45096
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:14:04 -0000
From: Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>
X-Patchwork-Id: 60167
Message-Id: <4C50736C.5070108@oracle.com>
To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>

Hi,

adding the begin and end overloads for initializer_list very slightly
changed the behavior of the C++ front-end on this testcase and now the
error at line 13 mentions initializer_list<_Tp>, instead of the previous
initializer_list<auto>. That change seems benign to me and I'm proposing
to just tweak a bit the testcase. Patch tested x86_64-linux. Is it ok?

Thanks,
Paolo.

/////////////////
2010-07-28  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>

	PR c++/45096
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C: Tweak dg-error string.


Index: g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C
===================================================================
--- g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C	(revision 162649)
+++ g++.dg/cpp0x/auto3.C	(working copy)
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ auto x;				// { dg-error "auto" }
 auto i = 42, j = 42.0;		// { dg-error "auto" }
 
 // New CWG issue
-auto a[2] = { 1, 2 };		// { dg-error "auto" }
+auto a[2] = { 1, 2 };		// { dg-error "initializer_list" }
 
 template<class T>
 struct A { };