diff mbox

mtd: nand: jz4780: fixup, device structure assigned at probe

Message ID 1458784407-12908-1-git-send-email-jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org
State Accepted
Commit ce8716e97149d15379603890c4c7a2acfcf4a7ee
Headers show

Commit Message

Jorge Ramirez March 24, 2016, 1:53 a.m. UTC
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Ezequiel Garcia March 24, 2016, 2:54 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Jorge,

On 23 March 2016 at 22:53, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
<jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org> wrote:

Can you re-submit, with some proper commit log explaining the patch?

> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c
> index 755499c..d74f4ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c
> @@ -287,7 +287,6 @@ static struct jz4780_bch *jz4780_bch_get(struct device_node *np)
>         bch = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>         clk_prepare_enable(bch->clk);
>
> -       bch->dev = &pdev->dev;
>         return bch;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.5.0
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/


Thanks,
Boris Brezillon March 30, 2016, 2:34 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:53:27 -0400
Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org> wrote:

How about adding the following message:

"
bch->dev is already assigned to &pdev->dev in the probe function.
Remove the duplicate assignment done in jz4780_bch_get().
"

If you agree I'll add this commit message while applying (no need to
resend).

Harvey, can I have your ack on this patch?

Thanks,

Boris

> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c
> index 755499c..d74f4ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c
> @@ -287,7 +287,6 @@ static struct jz4780_bch *jz4780_bch_get(struct device_node *np)
>  	bch = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  	clk_prepare_enable(bch->clk);
>  
> -	bch->dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	return bch;
>  }
>
Harvey Hunt March 30, 2016, 2:36 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi,

On 30/03/16 15:34, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:53:27 -0400
> Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> How about adding the following message:
>
> "
> bch->dev is already assigned to &pdev->dev in the probe function.
> Remove the duplicate assignment done in jz4780_bch_get().
> "
>
> If you agree I'll add this commit message while applying (no need to
> resend).

That sounds good to me. Congrats on the maintainership btw. :-)

>
> Harvey, can I have your ack on this patch?

Acked-by: Harvey Hunt <harvey.hunt@imgtec.com>

>
> Thanks,
>
> Boris
>

Thanks,

Harvey

>> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c | 1 -
>>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c
>> index 755499c..d74f4ba 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c
>> @@ -287,7 +287,6 @@ static struct jz4780_bch *jz4780_bch_get(struct device_node *np)
>>   	bch = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>   	clk_prepare_enable(bch->clk);
>>
>> -	bch->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>   	return bch;
>>   }
>>
>
>
>
Jorge Ramirez March 30, 2016, 2:37 p.m. UTC | #4
On 03/30/2016 10:34 AM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:53:27 -0400
> Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> How about adding the following message:
>
> "
> bch->dev is already assigned to &pdev->dev in the probe function.
> Remove the duplicate assignment done in jz4780_bch_get().
> "
>
> If you agree I'll add this commit message while applying (no need to
> resend).

I am so sorry - got side tracked I should have followed up.
yes that is what I tried (seems like I failed miserably) to indicated in the
commit title.

>
> Harvey, can I have your ack on this patch?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Boris
Boris Brezillon March 30, 2016, 3:01 p.m. UTC | #5
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:36:51 +0100
Harvey Hunt <harvey.hunt@imgtec.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 30/03/16 15:34, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 21:53:27 -0400
> > Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > How about adding the following message:
> >
> > "
> > bch->dev is already assigned to &pdev->dev in the probe function.
> > Remove the duplicate assignment done in jz4780_bch_get().
> > "
> >
> > If you agree I'll add this commit message while applying (no need to
> > resend).
> 
> That sounds good to me. Congrats on the maintainership btw. :-)

Thanks.

> 
> >
> > Harvey, can I have your ack on this patch?
> 
> Acked-by: Harvey Hunt <harvey.hunt@imgtec.com>

Applied to nand/next.

Thanks,

Boris
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c
index 755499c..d74f4ba 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4780_bch.c
@@ -287,7 +287,6 @@  static struct jz4780_bch *jz4780_bch_get(struct device_node *np)
 	bch = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 	clk_prepare_enable(bch->clk);
 
-	bch->dev = &pdev->dev;
 	return bch;
 }