From patchwork Fri Jul 23 09:55:11 2010
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jie Zhang <jie@codesourcery.com>
X-Patchwork-Id: 59761
Return-Path: 
 <gcc-patches-return-268841-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org
Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org
Received: from sourceware.org (server1.sourceware.org [209.132.180.131])
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3182DB70F3
	for <incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org>;
	Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:55:23 +1000 (EST)
Received: (qmail 9269 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2010 09:55:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 9260 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jul 2010 09:55:21 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL, BAYES_00,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com)
	(38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with
	ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:55:15 +0000
Received: (qmail 20786 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2010 09:55:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (jie@127.0.0.2) by
	mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 23 Jul 2010 09:55:13 -0000
Message-ID: <4C4966FF.8040604@codesourcery.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:55:11 +0800
From: Jie Zhang <jie@codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix a pasto
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: 
 <mailto:gcc-patches-unsubscribe-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org

This patch fixes a pasto in GCC dumping. Is it OK?


Regards,


	* tree-sra.c (ipa_sra_preliminary_function_checks): Dump
	proper words when !tree_versionable_function_p.

Index: tree-sra.c
===================================================================
--- tree-sra.c	(revision 162448)
+++ tree-sra.c	(working copy)
@@ -4311,7 +4311,7 @@ ipa_sra_preliminary_function_checks (str
   if (!tree_versionable_function_p (node->decl))
     {
       if (dump_file)
-	fprintf (dump_file, "Function not local to this compilation unit.\n");
+	fprintf (dump_file, "Function is not versionable.\n");
       return false;
     }