Message ID | 20160314164549.GA20174@piout.net |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Hi Alexandre, On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:45:49 +0100 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > Here is the pull-request for the RTC susbsystem for 4.6. It is based on > v4.5-rc1 as arm-soc, through samsung-soc, depends on an immutable tag: > rtc-max77686-4.6 > > The following changes since commit 92e963f50fc74041b5e9e744c330dca48e04f08d: > > Linux 4.5-rc1 (2016-01-24 13:06:47 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git tags/rtc-4.6 > > for you to fetch changes up to cee2cc21550648679d222cbe2637fcc6d0f730ef: > > rtc: pcf2127: add pcf2129 device id (2016-03-14 17:08:41 +0100) Partly rebased since yesterday - presumably to fix up some of the commit messages.
On 15/03/2016 at 10:50:45 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote : > Hi Alexandre, > > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:45:49 +0100 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > > > Here is the pull-request for the RTC susbsystem for 4.6. It is based on > > v4.5-rc1 as arm-soc, through samsung-soc, depends on an immutable tag: > > rtc-max77686-4.6 > > > > The following changes since commit 92e963f50fc74041b5e9e744c330dca48e04f08d: > > > > Linux 4.5-rc1 (2016-01-24 13:06:47 -0800) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git tags/rtc-4.6 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to cee2cc21550648679d222cbe2637fcc6d0f730ef: > > > > rtc: pcf2127: add pcf2129 device id (2016-03-14 17:08:41 +0100) > > Partly rebased since yesterday - presumably to fix up some of the commit messages. > Indeed, I forgot to fixup a few commit messages a while ago and I did that before sending the PR. Is that an issue?
Hi Alexandre, On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:58:31 +0100 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > Indeed, I forgot to fixup a few commit messages a while ago and I did > that before sending the PR. Is that an issue? Not in this case (since the base is the same and the patches themselves have not changed), but in general it does make it harder to see how much testing etc the changes have had.