| Submitter | Eric Dumazet |
|---|---|
| Date | July 16, 2010, 12:20 p.m. |
| Message ID | <1279282842.2549.16.camel@edumazet-laptop> |
| Download | mbox | patch |
| Permalink | /patch/59095/ |
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
Comments
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:20:42 +0200 > Le vendredi 16 juillet 2010 à 11:56 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit : > >> [PATCH] ehea: ehea_get_stats() should use GFP_KERNEL >> >> ehea_get_stats() is called in process context and should use GFP_KERNEL >> allocation instead of GFP_ATOMIC. >> >> Clearing stats at beginning of ehea_get_stats() is racy in case of >> concurrent stat readers. >> >> get_stats() can also use netdev net_device_stats, instead of a private >> copy. >> >> Reported-by: divya <dipraksh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h | 1 - >> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c | 6 ++---- >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> > > Hmm, net-next-2.6 contains following patch : If people think ehea usage is ubiquitous enough to deserve a backport of this to net-2.6, fine. But personally I don't think it's worth it. Can someone close the kernel bugzilla 16406 created for this bug? This patch we have already obviously would fix this issue.
Patch
diff --git a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c index 8b92acb..3beba70 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ static struct net_device_stats *ehea_get_stats(struct net_device *dev) memset(stats, 0, sizeof(*stats)); - cb2 = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_ATOMIC); + cb2 = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL); if (!cb2) { ehea_error("no mem for cb2");