mbox

[GIT,PULL,3/4] arm64: nxp: device tree changes for 4.6

Message ID 1456844403-26176-3-git-send-email-shawnguo@kernel.org
State New
Headers show

Pull-request

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git tags/imx-dt64-4.6

Message

Shawn Guo March 1, 2016, 3 p.m. UTC
Hi arm-soc maintainers,

This is the first time I help to collect NXP/Freescale arm64 dts
patches.  I used to ignore such patches, because they do not belong
to i.MX family.  But since people keep sending me patches, I decided
to help accelerate the process for getting these patches land on
mainline.

I should probably start naming my branches and tags like nxp/* from the
next cycle.

Shawn

The following changes since commit 92e963f50fc74041b5e9e744c330dca48e04f08d:

  Linux 4.5-rc1 (2016-01-24 13:06:47 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git tags/imx-dt64-4.6

for you to fetch changes up to 4c1d9ea7402dd808fc511ef6622f957aa795852f:

  arm64: dts: ls1043a: Add quirk for Erratum A009116 (2016-02-14 16:44:15 +0800)

----------------------------------------------------------------
The NXP/Freescale arm64 dts update for 4.6:
- Add "snps,quirk-frame-length-adjustment" property to USB3 node for
  erratum A009116, which affects NXP/Freescale arm64 SoCs LS1043A and
  LS2080A.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Lijun Pan (1):
      arm64: dts: ls2080a: Add quirk for Erratum A009116

Rajesh Bhagat (1):
      arm64: dts: ls1043a: Add quirk for Erratum A009116

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1043a.dtsi | 3 +++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann March 2, 2016, 10:09 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tuesday 01 March 2016 23:00:02 Shawn Guo wrote:
> This is the first time I help to collect NXP/Freescale arm64 dts
> patches.  I used to ignore such patches, because they do not belong
> to i.MX family.  But since people keep sending me patches, I decided
> to help accelerate the process for getting these patches land on
> mainline.

Much appreciated!
 
> I should probably start naming my branches and tags like nxp/* from the
> next cycle.

I don't care much either way, unless you also want to start picking
up the patches for the lpc18xx and lpc32xx SoC families that currently
have other maintainers.

I've pulled the patches into next/dt64, thanks!

	Arnd
Shawn Guo March 7, 2016, 3:33 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 11:09:59PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 March 2016 23:00:02 Shawn Guo wrote:
> > This is the first time I help to collect NXP/Freescale arm64 dts
> > patches.  I used to ignore such patches, because they do not belong
> > to i.MX family.  But since people keep sending me patches, I decided
> > to help accelerate the process for getting these patches land on
> > mainline.
> 
> Much appreciated!
>  
> > I should probably start naming my branches and tags like nxp/* from the
> > next cycle.
> 
> I don't care much either way, unless you also want to start picking
> up the patches for the lpc18xx and lpc32xx SoC families that currently
> have other maintainers.

Okay.  I will keep the current naming schema.

> I've pulled the patches into next/dt64, thanks!

Thanks.

Shawn