Message ID | 1278236813.4645.7.camel@linux-fd1f.site |
---|---|

State | New |

Headers | show |

Thomas Koenig wrote: > During regression-testing, there was a failure of > dynamic_dispatch_6.f03 at higher optimization levels. See: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44596 (Paul has a draft patch for this.) Regarding the patch: Glancing at it, I do not understand the patch. My impression is that it won't work, but your example proofs me wrong. If no one reviews it, I will do so later. Anyway, I was puzzled about: a) For esss = sum(Ix * Iyz, 0) ! { dg-error "is not a valid dimension index" } when does dim_range_check actually get called? dim=0 is wrong, but gfc_check_product_sum does not call dim_rank_check. b) I do not understand the: + switch(array->value.function.isym->id) + { + case GFC_ISYM_SUM: + rank = array->rank + 1; + break; If I have count(array=maxval(arrayvar), dim=1), why can't I use "array->rank" but have to use "array->rank + 1"? Why doesn't maxval(arrayvar) return the correct rank? Tobias

Am Sonntag, den 04.07.2010, 12:27 +0200 schrieb Tobias Burnus: > Anyway, I was puzzled about: > > a) For > > esss = sum(Ix * Iyz, 0) ! { dg-error "is not a valid dimension index" } > > when does dim_range_check actually get called? dim=0 is wrong, but > gfc_check_product_sum does not call dim_rank_check. gfc_check_product_sum calls check_reduction, which in turn calls dim_rank_check. > > b) I do not understand the: > > + switch(array->value.function.isym->id) > + { > + case GFC_ISYM_SUM: > + rank = array->rank + 1; > + break; > > > If I have count(array=maxval(arrayvar), dim=1), why can't I use > "array->rank" but have to use "array->rank + 1"? Why doesn't > maxval(arrayvar) return the correct rank? Consider real a(10:10) then "sum(a,dim=2)" is correct, and the sum has rank 1. If you think a more descriptive comment is in order, I will be more than happy to oblige ;-) Thomas

Thomas Koenig wrote: > OK for trunk? > Not OK - for the reason I was expecting. - if (dim->expr_type != EXPR_CONSTANT - || (array->expr_type != EXPR_VARIABLE - && array->expr_type != EXPR_ARRAY)) + if (dim->expr_type != EXPR_CONSTANT) return SUCCESS; This part is OK. While the following does not make sense at all: - rank = array->rank; + if (array->expr_type == EXPR_FUNCTION && array->value.function.isym) + { + + /* Functions which reduce the rank of their arguments. */ + switch(array->value.function.isym->id) + { + case GFC_ISYM_SUM: + case GFC_ISYM_PRODUCT: + case GFC_ISYM_ANY: + case GFC_ISYM_ALL: + case GFC_ISYM_COUNT: + case GFC_ISYM_MINVAL: + case GFC_ISYM_MAXVAL: + rank = array->rank + 1; + break; + + default: + rank = array->rank; + } + } + else + { + rank = array->rank; + } + Example: real :: a(3,3,3) a = 5.0 print *, sum(sum(a,dim=1), dim=3) end That code is invalid as "sum" only returns a rank 2 array, but due to the increment of the rank in the second part of your patch, this is not rejected. How about using only the first part of your patch - and keep the old and simple rank = array->rank; OK if you do this and add the add the new example to the test file. Tobias

Hi Tobias, > How about using only the first part of your patch - and keep the old > and > simple > rank = array->rank; Actually, you are correct. I was led down the garden path by a failure in minmaxloc_4.f90, which contains PROGRAM TST IMPLICIT NONE REAL :: A(1,3) REAL :: B(3,1) [...] if (minloc(sum(b(1:3,:),2),2) .ne. 1) call abort() if (maxloc(sum(b(1:3,:),2),2) .ne. 3) call abort() which is wrong. Thanks for catching the error! I will commit a correct version shortly. Thomas

Index: check.c =================================================================== --- check.c (Revision 161784) +++ check.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -473,12 +473,34 @@ dim_rank_check (gfc_expr *dim, gfc_expr *array, in if (dim == NULL) return SUCCESS; - if (dim->expr_type != EXPR_CONSTANT - || (array->expr_type != EXPR_VARIABLE - && array->expr_type != EXPR_ARRAY)) + if (dim->expr_type != EXPR_CONSTANT) return SUCCESS; - rank = array->rank; + if (array->expr_type == EXPR_FUNCTION && array->value.function.isym) + { + + /* Functions which reduce the rank of their arguments. */ + switch(array->value.function.isym->id) + { + case GFC_ISYM_SUM: + case GFC_ISYM_PRODUCT: + case GFC_ISYM_ANY: + case GFC_ISYM_ALL: + case GFC_ISYM_COUNT: + case GFC_ISYM_MINVAL: + case GFC_ISYM_MAXVAL: + rank = array->rank + 1; + break; + + default: + rank = array->rank; + } + } + else + { + rank = array->rank; + } + if (array->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE) { ar = gfc_find_array_ref (array);