Patchwork xfrm bugs with mark logic

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Peter Kosyh
Date July 2, 2010, 10:40 a.m.
Message ID <AANLkTimsVHoNk3B1oTI6awlNtrmNED7vwe2flzTap9aP@mail.gmail.com>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/57648/
State Superseded
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Comments

Peter Kosyh - July 2, 2010, 10:40 a.m.
Hello! I am currently working with 2.6.34, trying to use iptables ...
-j MARK with XFRM policy. So, i found at least
two bugs in 2.6.34 kernel.

First bug is just typo in  xfrm_mark_get (net/xfrm.h):

memcpy(m, nla_data(attrs[XFRMA_MARK]), sizeof(m));

must be:

memcpy(m, nla_data(attrs[XFRMA_MARK]), sizeof(*m));

The second one, is clearing mark in flowi structure via memset in
_decode_session4 (net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c).
(see net/ipv4/netfilter.c, ip_route_me_harder function)
int ip_route_me_harder(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned addr_type)
/* ... */
        if (addr_type == RTN_LOCAL) {
/* ... */
                fl.mark = skb->mark; /* here, set mark from skb */
/* ... */
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
        if (!(IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED) &&
            xfrm_decode_session(skb, &fl, AF_INET) == 0) { /* here
fl->mark will be zeroed */
            /* ... */
            if (xfrm_lookup(net, &dst, &fl, skb->sk, 0)) /* here
policy lookup will fail */

Do not know about ipv6 anything, but it's like that it affected by
this bug too. :(

P.S. Sorry for my bad English. :)

w.b.r. Peter Kosyh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Eric Dumazet - July 2, 2010, 3:01 p.m.
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010 à 14:40 +0400, Peter Kosyh a écrit :
> Hello! I am currently working with 2.6.34, trying to use iptables ...
> -j MARK with XFRM policy. So, i found at least
> two bugs in 2.6.34 kernel.
> 
> First bug is just typo in  xfrm_mark_get (net/xfrm.h):
> 
> memcpy(m, nla_data(attrs[XFRMA_MARK]), sizeof(m));
> 
> must be:
> 
> memcpy(m, nla_data(attrs[XFRMA_MARK]), sizeof(*m));
> 
> The second one, is clearing mark in flowi structure via memset in
> _decode_session4 (net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c).
> (see net/ipv4/netfilter.c, ip_route_me_harder function)
> int ip_route_me_harder(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned addr_type)
> /* ... */
>         if (addr_type == RTN_LOCAL) {
> /* ... */
>                 fl.mark = skb->mark; /* here, set mark from skb */
> /* ... */
> #ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>         if (!(IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_XFRM_TRANSFORMED) &&
>             xfrm_decode_session(skb, &fl, AF_INET) == 0) { /* here
> fl->mark will be zeroed */
>             /* ... */
>             if (xfrm_lookup(net, &dst, &fl, skb->sk, 0)) /* here
> policy lookup will fail */
> 
> Do not know about ipv6 anything, but it's like that it affected by
> this bug too. :(
> 
> P.S. Sorry for my bad English. :)
> 
> w.b.r. Peter Kosyh
> 
> diff -Nur linux-2.6.34/include/net/xfrm.h linux-2.6.34.fix/include/net/xfrm.h
> --- linux-2.6.34/include/net/xfrm.h	2010-05-16 21:17:36.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.34.fix/include/net/xfrm.h	2010-07-02 10:05:33.000000000 +0000
> @@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@
>  static inline int xfrm_mark_get(struct nlattr **attrs, struct xfrm_mark *m)
>  {
>  	if (attrs[XFRMA_MARK])
> -		memcpy(m, nla_data(attrs[XFRMA_MARK]), sizeof(m));
> +		memcpy(m, nla_data(attrs[XFRMA_MARK]), sizeof(*m));
>  	else
>  		m->v = m->m = 0;
> diff -Nur linux-2.6.34/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
> linux-2.6.34.fix/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
> --- linux-2.6.34/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c	2010-05-16 21:17:36.000000000 +0000
> +++ linux-2.6.34.fix/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c	2010-07-02 10:17:51.000000000 +0000
> @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@
>  	fl->fl4_dst = reverse ? iph->saddr : iph->daddr;
>  	fl->fl4_src = reverse ? iph->daddr : iph->saddr;
>  	fl->fl4_tos = iph->tos;
> +	fl->mark = skb->mark;
>  }
> 
>  static inline int xfrm4_garbage_collect(struct dst_ops *ops)
> --

Hi Peter

XFRMA_MARK part already in net-2.6 tree :

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4efd7e833591721bec21cc4730a7f6261417840f

Please submit another patch the second problem you spotted ?




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Patch

diff -Nur linux-2.6.34/include/net/xfrm.h linux-2.6.34.fix/include/net/xfrm.h
--- linux-2.6.34/include/net/xfrm.h	2010-05-16 21:17:36.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.34.fix/include/net/xfrm.h	2010-07-02 10:05:33.000000000 +0000
@@ -1587,7 +1587,7 @@ 
 static inline int xfrm_mark_get(struct nlattr **attrs, struct xfrm_mark *m)
 {
 	if (attrs[XFRMA_MARK])
-		memcpy(m, nla_data(attrs[XFRMA_MARK]), sizeof(m));
+		memcpy(m, nla_data(attrs[XFRMA_MARK]), sizeof(*m));
 	else
 		m->v = m->m = 0;
diff -Nur linux-2.6.34/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
linux-2.6.34.fix/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c
--- linux-2.6.34/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c	2010-05-16 21:17:36.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.34.fix/net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c	2010-07-02 10:17:51.000000000 +0000
@@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ 
 	fl->fl4_dst = reverse ? iph->saddr : iph->daddr;
 	fl->fl4_src = reverse ? iph->daddr : iph->saddr;
 	fl->fl4_tos = iph->tos;
+	fl->mark = skb->mark;
 }

 static inline int xfrm4_garbage_collect(struct dst_ops *ops)