xfail one ppc testcase (PR tree-optimization/66612)
diff mbox

Message ID 20160120142834.GZ3017@tucnak.redhat.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Jakub Jelinek Jan. 20, 2016, 2:28 p.m. UTC
Hi!

As per discussion in the PR, I'd like to xfail this test for GCC6 and
change it to 7.0 milestone, because it is too late/too risky to change
this for gcc 6 now.

Bootstrapped/regtested on powerpc64{,le}-linux, ok for trunk?

2016-01-20  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR tree-optimization/66612
	* gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c: Xfail the scan-assembler test
	for bdn instruction.


	Jakub

Comments

David Edelsohn Jan. 20, 2016, 2:35 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As per discussion in the PR, I'd like to xfail this test for GCC6 and
> change it to 7.0 milestone, because it is too late/too risky to change
> this for gcc 6 now.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on powerpc64{,le}-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> 2016-01-20  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>
>         PR tree-optimization/66612
>         * gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c: Xfail the scan-assembler test
>         for bdn instruction.

Okay with me.

Thanks, David

Patch
diff mbox

--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c.jj	2008-09-05 12:54:15.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c	2016-01-20 09:16:12.885474312 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ 
 /* Make sure the doloop optimization is done for this loop. */
 /* { dg-do compile { target powerpc*-*-* } } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2" } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bdn" } } */
+/* XFAIL for now, see PR66612.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bdn" { xfail *-*-* } } } */
 extern int a[];
 int foo(int w) {
   int n = w;