Message ID | 56976194.4030405@monstr.eu |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Tom Rini |
Headers | show |
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Tom, > > here are microblaze patches for moving stuff to DM. This is the patch > series which we postpone to next release. Buildman doesn't show any > problems for mb, zynq_zc702 and zynqmp. It breaks xilinx-ppc440-generic at least 'tho, please fix, thanks!
Hi Ricardo, On 14.1.2016 14:17, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > >> Hi Tom, >> >> here are microblaze patches for moving stuff to DM. This is the patch >> series which we postpone to next release. Buildman doesn't show any >> problems for mb, zynq_zc702 and zynqmp. > > It breaks xilinx-ppc440-generic at least 'tho, please fix, thanks! The reason for this break is moving serial driver to DM. Can you please tell us when you move platform to DM? Thanks, Michal
Hello Michal I will give a look to it during the next week. Hopefuly by the end of it I can give you the patch or an educated estimated. Is this a good timeline for you? Thanks! On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> wrote: > Hi Ricardo, > > On 14.1.2016 14:17, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: >> >>> Hi Tom, >>> >>> here are microblaze patches for moving stuff to DM. This is the patch >>> series which we postpone to next release. Buildman doesn't show any >>> problems for mb, zynq_zc702 and zynqmp. >> >> It breaks xilinx-ppc440-generic at least 'tho, please fix, thanks! > > The reason for this break is moving serial driver to DM. > Can you please tell us when you move platform to DM? > > Thanks, > Michal > > -- > Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 > w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 > Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ > Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture > Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform > > > > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot >
Hi, On 14.1.2016 21:24, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Hello Michal > > I will give a look to it during the next week. Hopefuly by the end of > it I can give you the patch or an educated estimated. Is this a good > timeline for you? ok. Let's wait one more week and I hope you will have SPL up and running. Thanks, Michal
Hi Ricardo, are you on track on this? Thanks, Michal On 15.1.2016 08:08, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi, > > On 14.1.2016 21:24, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: >> Hello Michal >> >> I will give a look to it during the next week. Hopefuly by the end of >> it I can give you the patch or an educated estimated. Is this a good >> timeline for you? > > ok. Let's wait one more week and I hope you will have SPL up and running. > > Thanks, > Michal >
I have allocated the whole Friday for this On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> wrote: > Hi Ricardo, > > are you on track on this? > > Thanks, > Michal > > On 15.1.2016 08:08, Michal Simek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 14.1.2016 21:24, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: >>> Hello Michal >>> >>> I will give a look to it during the next week. Hopefuly by the end of >>> it I can give you the patch or an educated estimated. Is this a good >>> timeline for you? >> >> ok. Let's wait one more week and I hope you will have SPL up and running. >> >> Thanks, >> Michal >> > > > -- > Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 > w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 > Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ > Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture > Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform > >
Hello I will probably have something by next week. Is it ok? On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@uam.es> wrote: > I have allocated the whole Friday for this > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> wrote: >> Hi Ricardo, >> >> are you on track on this? >> >> Thanks, >> Michal >> >> On 15.1.2016 08:08, Michal Simek wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 14.1.2016 21:24, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: >>>> Hello Michal >>>> >>>> I will give a look to it during the next week. Hopefuly by the end of >>>> it I can give you the patch or an educated estimated. Is this a good >>>> timeline for you? >>> >>> ok. Let's wait one more week and I hope you will have SPL up and running. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Michal >>> >> >> >> -- >> Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 >> w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 >> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ >> Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture >> Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform >> >> > > > > -- > Ricardo Ribalda
Hi, On 22.1.2016 15:53, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Hello > > I will probably have something by next week. Is it ok? do you want to me to wait? I have another sort of 50 patches which I would like to merge in this merge window to have enough time for testing. Thanks, Michal
Hi Tom, On 22.1.2016 19:23, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi, > > On 22.1.2016 15:53, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: >> Hello >> >> I will probably have something by next week. Is it ok? > > do you want to me to wait? I have another sort of 50 patches which I > would like to merge in this merge window to have enough time for testing. ups. It was mentioned to be address to you. Thanks, Michal
Hi My main concern is that the support for the board is not removed. I have one active product based on virtex5 ppc440. Today I had to do some last minute support and now I am on a plane... Otherwise the patchset would be on your inbox. I have taken a fast look over the required changes, and it is not that bad. Most of the hard work has already been done by you for mblaze. Thanks for your understanding ;). On 22 Jan 2016 19:23, "Michal Simek" <monstr@monstr.eu> wrote: > Hi, > > On 22.1.2016 15:53, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > > Hello > > > > I will probably have something by next week. Is it ok? > > do you want to me to wait? I have another sort of 50 patches which I > would like to merge in this merge window to have enough time for testing. > > Thanks, > Michal > > -- > Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 > w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 > Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ > Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture > Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform > > >
Hi, On 22.1.2016 19:34, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Hi > > My main concern is that the support for the board is not removed. I have > one active product based on virtex5 ppc440. > > Today I had to do some last minute support and now I am on a plane... > Otherwise the patchset would be on your inbox. > > I have taken a fast look over the required changes, and it is not that bad. > Most of the hard work has already been done by you for mblaze. > > Thanks for your understanding ;). You got max 2 more days to solve it. After that I will just disable uartlite support for this platform and will send updated pull request as we discussed with Tom. Thanks, Michal
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:24:20AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi, > > On 22.1.2016 19:34, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > > Hi > > > > My main concern is that the support for the board is not removed. I have > > one active product based on virtex5 ppc440. > > > > Today I had to do some last minute support and now I am on a plane... > > Otherwise the patchset would be on your inbox. > > > > I have taken a fast look over the required changes, and it is not that bad. > > Most of the hard work has already been done by you for mblaze. > > > > Thanks for your understanding ;). > > You got max 2 more days to solve it. After that I will just disable > uartlite support for this platform and will send updated pull request as > we discussed with Tom. Since this was on IRC, yes, we should disable the uartlite support to keep 440 building if this can't be resolved by enabling DM there instead as I don't want to block everything else on this. Thanks!