diff mbox

Fix (ab) SSA_NAME issue in gimple folding (PR tree-optimization/69167, take 2)

Message ID 20160108200836.GC18720@tucnak.redhat.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Jakub Jelinek Jan. 8, 2016, 8:08 p.m. UTC
Hi!

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 10:12:09AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Various places check that (ab) SSA_NAMEs that weren't referenced on a stmt
> > before don't appear on it, but all the checking is done on the gimple tuple
> > operands, while in this case it is added to operands of a comparison of
> > COND_EXPR/VEC_COND_EXPR.  The following patch fixes it,
> > bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
> 
> Hmm, I think this needs to go to the stmt replacement part,
> replace_stmt_with_simplification.

Ok, here is another version that does that.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2016-01-08  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

        PR tree-optimization/69167
        * gimple-fold.c (replace_stmt_with_simplification): Also punt if
	new SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI SSA_NAMEs appear in operands of
	ops[0] comparison.
	* gimple-match-head.c (maybe_push_res_to_seq): Likewise.

	* gcc.dg/pr69167.c: New test.


	Jakub

Comments

Richard Biener Jan. 8, 2016, 8:43 p.m. UTC | #1
On January 8, 2016 9:08:36 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>Hi!
>
>On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 10:12:09AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> 
>> > Hi!
>> > 
>> > Various places check that (ab) SSA_NAMEs that weren't referenced on
>a stmt
>> > before don't appear on it, but all the checking is done on the
>gimple tuple
>> > operands, while in this case it is added to operands of a
>comparison of
>> > COND_EXPR/VEC_COND_EXPR.  The following patch fixes it,
>> > bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for
>trunk?
>> 
>> Hmm, I think this needs to go to the stmt replacement part,
>> replace_stmt_with_simplification.
>
>Ok, here is another version that does that.
>Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

OK.

Thanks,
Richard.

>2016-01-08  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>
>        PR tree-optimization/69167
>       * gimple-fold.c (replace_stmt_with_simplification): Also punt if
>	new SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI SSA_NAMEs appear in operands of
>	ops[0] comparison.
>	* gimple-match-head.c (maybe_push_res_to_seq): Likewise.
>
>	* gcc.dg/pr69167.c: New test.
>
>--- gcc/gimple-fold.c.jj	2016-01-08 11:12:34.000000000 +0100
>+++ gcc/gimple-fold.c	2016-01-08 11:20:25.324204191 +0100
>@@ -3309,7 +3309,14 @@ replace_stmt_with_simplification (gimple
>       || (ops[2]
> 	  && TREE_CODE (ops[2]) == SSA_NAME
> 	  && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (ops[2])
>-	  && !has_use_on_stmt (ops[2], stmt)))
>+	  && !has_use_on_stmt (ops[2], stmt))
>+      || (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (ops[0])
>+	  && ((TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 0)) == SSA_NAME
>+	       && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 0))
>+	       && !has_use_on_stmt (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 0), stmt))
>+	      || (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 1)) == SSA_NAME
>+		  && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 1))
>+		  && !has_use_on_stmt (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 1), stmt)))))
>     return false;
> 
>  /* Don't insert new statements when INPLACE is true, even if we could
>--- gcc/gimple-match-head.c.jj	2016-01-08 09:36:14.000000000 +0100
>+++ gcc/gimple-match-head.c	2016-01-08 12:26:21.555528562 +0100
>@@ -299,7 +299,14 @@ maybe_push_res_to_seq (code_helper rcode
> 	      && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (ops[1]))
> 	  || (ops[2]
> 	      && TREE_CODE (ops[2]) == SSA_NAME
>-	      && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (ops[2])))
>+	      && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (ops[2]))
>+	  || (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (ops[0])
>+	      && ((TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 0)) == SSA_NAME
>+		   && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0],
>+								     0)))
>+		  || (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 1)) == SSA_NAME
>+		      && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0],
>+									1))))))
> 	return NULL_TREE;
>       if (!res)
> 	{
>--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69167.c.jj	2016-01-08 11:15:22.498485105
>+0100
>+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69167.c	2016-01-08 11:15:22.498485105 +0100
>@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>+/* PR tree-optimization/69167 */
>+/* { dg-do compile } */
>+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
>+
>+int sigsetjmp (char *);
>+void foo ();
>+void bar (void (*) (int *));
>+extern char t[];
>+
>+void
>+baz (int *x)
>+{
>+  int *a = x;
>+  foo ();
>+  x = 0;
>+  if (sigsetjmp (t))
>+    while (1)
>+      bar (a ? baz : 0);
>+  if (x)
>+    foo ();
>+}
>
>	Jakub
diff mbox

Patch

--- gcc/gimple-fold.c.jj	2016-01-08 11:12:34.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/gimple-fold.c	2016-01-08 11:20:25.324204191 +0100
@@ -3309,7 +3309,14 @@  replace_stmt_with_simplification (gimple
       || (ops[2]
 	  && TREE_CODE (ops[2]) == SSA_NAME
 	  && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (ops[2])
-	  && !has_use_on_stmt (ops[2], stmt)))
+	  && !has_use_on_stmt (ops[2], stmt))
+      || (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (ops[0])
+	  && ((TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 0)) == SSA_NAME
+	       && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 0))
+	       && !has_use_on_stmt (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 0), stmt))
+	      || (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 1)) == SSA_NAME
+		  && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 1))
+		  && !has_use_on_stmt (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 1), stmt)))))
     return false;
 
   /* Don't insert new statements when INPLACE is true, even if we could
--- gcc/gimple-match-head.c.jj	2016-01-08 09:36:14.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/gimple-match-head.c	2016-01-08 12:26:21.555528562 +0100
@@ -299,7 +299,14 @@  maybe_push_res_to_seq (code_helper rcode
 	      && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (ops[1]))
 	  || (ops[2]
 	      && TREE_CODE (ops[2]) == SSA_NAME
-	      && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (ops[2])))
+	      && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (ops[2]))
+	  || (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (ops[0])
+	      && ((TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 0)) == SSA_NAME
+		   && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0],
+								     0)))
+		  || (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0], 1)) == SSA_NAME
+		      && SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI (TREE_OPERAND (ops[0],
+									1))))))
 	return NULL_TREE;
       if (!res)
 	{
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69167.c.jj	2016-01-08 11:15:22.498485105 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69167.c	2016-01-08 11:15:22.498485105 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ 
+/* PR tree-optimization/69167 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+int sigsetjmp (char *);
+void foo ();
+void bar (void (*) (int *));
+extern char t[];
+
+void
+baz (int *x)
+{
+  int *a = x;
+  foo ();
+  x = 0;
+  if (sigsetjmp (t))
+    while (1)
+      bar (a ? baz : 0);
+  if (x)
+    foo ();
+}