From patchwork Fri Jan 8 00:36:22 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jason Gunthorpe X-Patchwork-Id: 564536 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.34.181.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82EF6140556 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:36:47 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1aHL2m-0007SB-6s; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:36:40 +0000 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1aHL2k-0007S5-JS for tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:36:38 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of obsidianresearch.com designates 184.70.90.242 as permitted sender) client-ip=184.70.90.242; envelope-from=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com; helo=quartz.orcorp.ca; Received: from quartz.orcorp.ca ([184.70.90.242]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1aHL2j-00024L-AM for tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:36:38 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.160] (helo=jggl.edm.orcorp.ca) by quartz.orcorp.ca with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aHL2b-000061-CR; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 17:36:29 -0700 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Jarkko Sakkinen , tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:36:22 -0700 Message-Id: <1452213386-21460-4-git-send-email-jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1452213386-21460-1-git-send-email-jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> References: <1452213386-21460-1-git-send-email-jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> X-Broken-Reverse-DNS: no host name found for IP address 10.0.0.160 X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address X-Headers-End: 1aHL2j-00024L-AM Subject: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v4 3/7] tpm_tis: Do not fall back to a hardcoded address for TPM2 X-BeenThere: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Tpm Device Driver maintainance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: tpmdd-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net If the ACPI tables do not declare a memory resource for the TPM2 then do not just fall back to the x86 default base address. Also be stricter when checking the ancillary TPM2 ACPI data and error out if any of this data is wrong rather than blindly assuming TPM1. Fixes: 399235dc6e95 ("tpm, tpm_tis: fix tpm_tis ACPI detection issue with TPM 2.0") Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe Tested-by: Wilck, Martin Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen --- drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c index fecd27b45fd1..b2b31f5418ca 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c @@ -122,39 +122,11 @@ static inline int is_itpm(struct acpi_device *dev) { return has_hid(dev, "INTC0102"); } - -static inline int is_fifo(struct acpi_device *dev) -{ - struct acpi_table_tpm2 *tbl; - acpi_status st; - - /* TPM 1.2 FIFO */ - if (!has_hid(dev, "MSFT0101")) - return 1; - - st = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_TPM2, 1, - (struct acpi_table_header **) &tbl); - if (ACPI_FAILURE(st)) { - dev_err(&dev->dev, "failed to get TPM2 ACPI table\n"); - return 0; - } - - if (tbl->start_method != ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED) - return 0; - - /* TPM 2.0 FIFO */ - return 1; -} #else static inline int is_itpm(struct acpi_device *dev) { return 0; } - -static inline int is_fifo(struct acpi_device *dev) -{ - return 1; -} #endif /* Before we attempt to access the TPM we must see that the valid bit is set. @@ -980,11 +952,21 @@ static int tpm_check_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data) static int tpm_tis_acpi_init(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev) { + struct acpi_table_tpm2 *tbl; + acpi_status st; struct list_head resources; - struct tpm_info tpm_info = tis_default_info; + struct tpm_info tpm_info = {}; int ret; - if (!is_fifo(acpi_dev)) + st = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_TPM2, 1, + (struct acpi_table_header **) &tbl); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(st) || tbl->header.length < sizeof(*tbl)) { + dev_err(&acpi_dev->dev, + FW_BUG "failed to get TPM2 ACPI table\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (tbl->start_method != ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED) return -ENODEV; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resources); @@ -996,6 +978,12 @@ static int tpm_tis_acpi_init(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev) acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resources); + if (tpm_info.start == 0 && tpm_info.len == 0) { + dev_err(&acpi_dev->dev, + FW_BUG "TPM2 ACPI table does not define a memory resource\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + if (is_itpm(acpi_dev)) itpm = true;