@@ -905,6 +905,15 @@ int cachefiles_write_page(struct fscache_storage *op, struct page *page)
cache = container_of(object->fscache.cache,
struct cachefiles_cache, cache);
+ pos = (loff_t)page->index << PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ /* We mustn't write more data than we have, so we have to beware of a
+ * partial page at EOF.
+ */
+ eof = object->fscache.store_limit_l;
+ if (pos >= eof)
+ goto error;
+
/* write the page to the backing filesystem and let it store it in its
* own time */
path.mnt = cache->mnt;
@@ -912,40 +921,38 @@ int cachefiles_write_page(struct fscache_storage *op, struct page *page)
file = dentry_open(&path, O_RDWR | O_LARGEFILE, cache->cache_cred);
if (IS_ERR(file)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(file);
- } else {
- pos = (loff_t) page->index << PAGE_SHIFT;
-
- /* we mustn't write more data than we have, so we have
- * to beware of a partial page at EOF */
- eof = object->fscache.store_limit_l;
- len = PAGE_SIZE;
- if (eof & ~PAGE_MASK) {
- ASSERTCMP(pos, <, eof);
- if (eof - pos < PAGE_SIZE) {
- _debug("cut short %llx to %llx",
- pos, eof);
- len = eof - pos;
- ASSERTCMP(pos + len, ==, eof);
- }
- }
-
- data = kmap(page);
- ret = __kernel_write(file, data, len, &pos);
- kunmap(page);
- if (ret != len)
- ret = -EIO;
- fput(file);
+ goto error_2;
}
- if (ret < 0) {
- if (ret == -EIO)
- cachefiles_io_error_obj(
- object, "Write page to backing file failed");
- ret = -ENOBUFS;
+ len = PAGE_SIZE;
+ if (eof & ~PAGE_MASK) {
+ if (eof - pos < PAGE_SIZE) {
+ _debug("cut short %llx to %llx",
+ pos, eof);
+ len = eof - pos;
+ ASSERTCMP(pos + len, ==, eof);
+ }
}
- _leave(" = %d", ret);
- return ret;
+ data = kmap(page);
+ ret = __kernel_write(file, data, len, &pos);
+ kunmap(page);
+ fput(file);
+ if (ret != len)
+ goto error_eio;
+
+ _leave(" = 0");
+ return 0;
+
+error_eio:
+ ret = -EIO;
+error_2:
+ if (ret == -EIO)
+ cachefiles_io_error_obj(object,
+ "Write page to backing file failed");
+error:
+ _leave(" = -ENOBUFS [%d]", ret);
+ return -ENOBUFS;
}
/*
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ static void fscache_write_op(struct fscache_operation *_op)
goto superseded;
page = results[0];
_debug("gang %d [%lx]", n, page->index);
- if (page->index > op->store_limit) {
+ if (page->index >= op->store_limit) {
fscache_stat(&fscache_n_store_pages_over_limit);
goto superseded;
}
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled FS-Cache: Handle a write to the page immediately beyond the EOF marker to the linux-3.19.y-queue branch of the 3.19.y-ckt extended stable tree which can be found at: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/linux.git/log/?h=linux-3.19.y-queue This patch is scheduled to be released in version 3.19.8-ckt11. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please reply to this email. For more information about the 3.19.y-ckt tree, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable Thanks. -Kamal ------ From 75784de134ab95de2c3b7919442ddbb6dcb51ce4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 15:20:42 +0000 Subject: FS-Cache: Handle a write to the page immediately beyond the EOF marker commit 102f4d900c9c8f5ed89ae4746d493fe3ebd7ba64 upstream. Handle a write being requested to the page immediately beyond the EOF marker on a cache object. Currently this gets an assertion failure in CacheFiles because the EOF marker is used there to encode information about a partial page at the EOF - which could lead to an unknown blank spot in the file if we extend the file over it. The problem is actually in fscache where we check the index of the page being written against store_limit. store_limit is set to the number of pages that we're allowed to store by fscache_set_store_limit() - which means it's one more than the index of the last page we're allowed to store. The problem is that we permit writing to a page with an index _equal_ to the store limit - when we should reject that case. Whilst we're at it, change the triggered assertion in CacheFiles to just return -ENOBUFS instead. The assertion failure looks something like this: CacheFiles: Assertion failed 1000 < 7b1 is false ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c:962! ... RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa02c9e83>] [<ffffffffa02c9e83>] cachefiles_write_page+0x273/0x2d0 [cachefiles] Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com> --- fs/cachefiles/rdwr.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- fs/fscache/page.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1