| Message ID | 565CB0C0.9060104@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:25:36PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > Propagate the 64K message size limitation allowing client drivers > to deal properly with this limitation. Please don't submit patches into the middle of existing threads, it makes it very confusing trying to work out what the currently proposed patches are: 8592 N T 11/22 Heiner Kallweit (2.1K) │ │ ├─>[PATCH 2/3] mt 8593 N C 11/22 Michal Suchanek (0.5K) │ │ │ └─> -> 8594 N T 11/22 Heiner Kallweit (0.9K) │ │ ├─>[PATCH 3/3] sp 8595 N T 11/30 Heiner Kallweit (1.7K) │ │ ├─>[PATCH v2 1/2] 8596 N T 11/30 Heiner Kallweit (0.9K) │ │ └─>[PATCH resubmi 8597 NsF 11/22 To Heiner Kallw (1.4K) │ └─>Re: RfC: Handle I *think* the two messages from yesterday are supposed to be a single patch series but they're buried in the middle of a huge thread at the same level as some older patches and for soem reason have different tags (one of which is "resubmit" which is really just adding noise).
Am 01.12.2015 um 15:19 schrieb Mark Brown: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 09:25:36PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> Propagate the 64K message size limitation allowing client drivers >> to deal properly with this limitation. > > Please don't submit patches into the middle of existing threads, it > makes it very confusing trying to work out what the currently proposed > patches are: > > 8592 N T 11/22 Heiner Kallweit (2.1K) │ │ ├─>[PATCH 2/3] mt > 8593 N C 11/22 Michal Suchanek (0.5K) │ │ │ └─> > -> 8594 N T 11/22 Heiner Kallweit (0.9K) │ │ ├─>[PATCH 3/3] sp > 8595 N T 11/30 Heiner Kallweit (1.7K) │ │ ├─>[PATCH v2 1/2] > 8596 N T 11/30 Heiner Kallweit (0.9K) │ │ └─>[PATCH resubmi > 8597 NsF 11/22 To Heiner Kallw (1.4K) │ └─>Re: RfC: Handle > > I *think* the two messages from yesterday are supposed to be a single > patch series but they're buried in the middle of a huge thread at the > same level as some older patches and for soem reason have different tags > (one of which is "resubmit" which is really just adding noise). > Sorry, my mail template referred to the discussion thread. I'll resubmit.
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c index c27124a..773bbab 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c @@ -670,6 +670,7 @@ static struct spi_master * fsl_espi_probe(struct device *dev, master->cleanup = fsl_espi_cleanup; master->transfer_one_message = fsl_espi_do_one_msg; master->auto_runtime_pm = true; + master->max_msg_size = SPCOM_TRANLEN_MAX; mpc8xxx_spi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
Propagate the 64K message size limitation allowing client drivers to deal properly with this limitation. Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> --- drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)