diff mbox

[PATCHv2,1/3] MTD/pxa: use __devinit for pxa2xx_flash_probe

Message ID 4C0A13BA.6050700@gmail.com
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Wan ZongShun June 5, 2010, 9:07 a.m. UTC 
This patch is to use the '__devinit' for pxa2xx_flash_probe.

Signed-off-by: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>

---
 drivers/mtd/maps/pxa2xx-flash.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

Comments

Sergei Shtylyov June 5, 2010, 5:18 p.m. UTC | #1 
Wan ZongShun wrote:

> This patch is to use the '__devinit' for pxa2xx_flash_probe.

    Why? Is it hot-pluggable device? I guess not...

> Signed-off-by: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>

WBR, Sergei
Eric Miao June 6, 2010, 9:27 a.m. UTC | #2 
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 1:18 AM, Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com> wrote:
> Wan ZongShun wrote:
>
>> This patch is to use the '__devinit' for pxa2xx_flash_probe.
>
>   Why? Is it hot-pluggable device? I guess not...
>

Then I guess the __devexit is not applicable to pxa2xx_flash_remove as well.
Apart from the _probe() being unnecessarily built in when HOTPLUG is
defined, is there any drawbacks. It does make code a little bit consistent
from my POV.

>> Signed-off-by: Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com>
>> Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/pxa2xx-flash.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/pxa2xx-flash.c
index dd90880..d8ae634 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/maps/pxa2xx-flash.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/pxa2xx-flash.c
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@  struct pxa2xx_flash_info {
 static const char *probes[] = { "RedBoot", "cmdlinepart", NULL };


-static int __init pxa2xx_flash_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int __devinit pxa2xx_flash_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct flash_platform_data *flash = pdev->dev.platform_data;
 	struct pxa2xx_flash_info *info;