diff mbox

[V3,6/6] virtio-pci: unbreak queue_enable read

Message ID 1446796969-8049-7-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Jason Wang Nov. 6, 2015, 8:02 a.m. UTC
Guest always get zero when reading queue_enable. This violates
spec. Fixing this by setting the queue_enable to true during any guest
writing and setting it to zero during reset.

Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

Comments

Cornelia Huck Nov. 9, 2015, 1:14 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri,  6 Nov 2015 16:02:49 +0800
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:

> Guest always get zero when reading queue_enable. This violates
> spec. Fixing this by setting the queue_enable to true during any guest
> writing and setting it to zero during reset.
> 
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> index e4449da..52a9e33 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
> @@ -1384,6 +1384,7 @@ static void virtio_pci_common_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>                         proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].avail[0],
>                         ((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[1]) << 32 |
>                         proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[0]);
> +        proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].enabled = 1;

Hm. Spec says that the driver MUST NOT write 0 here. Does this need a
check?

<Also, I think you can remove the 'TODO' comment - this should be
handled now.>

>          break;
>      case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO:
>          proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[0] = val;
> @@ -1831,9 +1832,15 @@ static void virtio_pci_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
>  {
>      VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy = VIRTIO_PCI(qdev);
>      VirtioBusState *bus = VIRTIO_BUS(&proxy->bus);
> +    int i;
> +
>      virtio_pci_stop_ioeventfd(proxy);
>      virtio_bus_reset(bus);
>      msix_unuse_all_vectors(&proxy->pci_dev);
> +
> +    for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX; i++) {
> +        proxy->vqs[i].enabled = 0;
> +    }
>  }
> 
>  static Property virtio_pci_properties[] = {

Otherwise, this looks good to me.
Jason Wang Nov. 10, 2015, 2:51 a.m. UTC | #2
On 11/09/2015 09:14 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri,  6 Nov 2015 16:02:49 +0800
> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Guest always get zero when reading queue_enable. This violates
>> spec. Fixing this by setting the queue_enable to true during any guest
>> writing and setting it to zero during reset.
>>
>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 7 +++++++
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
>> index e4449da..52a9e33 100644
>> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
>> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
>> @@ -1384,6 +1384,7 @@ static void virtio_pci_common_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>>                         proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].avail[0],
>>                         ((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[1]) << 32 |
>>                         proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[0]);
>> +        proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].enabled = 1;
> Hm. Spec says that the driver MUST NOT write 0 here. 

Yes.

> Does this need a
> check?

Add warn in this case? I'm not sure, I read the spec as "writing any
value implies enabling". (And the patch itself does not conflict the spec).

>
> <Also, I think you can remove the 'TODO' comment - this should be
> handled now.>

Yes

>
>>          break;
>>      case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO:
>>          proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[0] = val;
>> @@ -1831,9 +1832,15 @@ static void virtio_pci_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
>>  {
>>      VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy = VIRTIO_PCI(qdev);
>>      VirtioBusState *bus = VIRTIO_BUS(&proxy->bus);
>> +    int i;
>> +
>>      virtio_pci_stop_ioeventfd(proxy);
>>      virtio_bus_reset(bus);
>>      msix_unuse_all_vectors(&proxy->pci_dev);
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX; i++) {
>> +        proxy->vqs[i].enabled = 0;
>> +    }
>>  }
>>
>>  static Property virtio_pci_properties[] = {
> Otherwise, this looks good to me.
>
>

Thanks
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
index e4449da..52a9e33 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
@@ -1384,6 +1384,7 @@  static void virtio_pci_common_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
                        proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].avail[0],
                        ((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[1]) << 32 |
                        proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[0]);
+        proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].enabled = 1;
         break;
     case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO:
         proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[0] = val;
@@ -1831,9 +1832,15 @@  static void virtio_pci_reset(DeviceState *qdev)
 {
     VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy = VIRTIO_PCI(qdev);
     VirtioBusState *bus = VIRTIO_BUS(&proxy->bus);
+    int i;
+
     virtio_pci_stop_ioeventfd(proxy);
     virtio_bus_reset(bus);
     msix_unuse_all_vectors(&proxy->pci_dev);
+
+    for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_QUEUE_MAX; i++) {
+        proxy->vqs[i].enabled = 0;
+    }
 }
 
 static Property virtio_pci_properties[] = {