Patchwork OneNAND: Introduce chip_probe function

login
register
mail settings
Submitter Kyungmin Park
Date May 28, 2010, 2:03 a.m.
Message ID <20100528020311.GA1608@july>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/53851/
State Accepted
Commit ad0d363b8fb7559a410483635349e22de6727988
Headers show

Comments

Kyungmin Park - May 28, 2010, 2:03 a.m.
Samsung SoCs use the own OneNAND controler and detect OneNAND chip at power on.
To use this feature, introduce the chip_probe function.

Also remove workaround for Samsung SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
---
Artem Bityutskiy - June 12, 2010, 2:26 p.m.
On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 11:03 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> Samsung SoCs use the own OneNAND controler and detect OneNAND chip at power on.
> To use this feature, introduce the chip_probe function.
> 
> Also remove workaround for Samsung SoCs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>

Pushed both to my l2-mtd-2.6.git / dunno.
Kyungmin Park - July 8, 2010, 12:50 a.m.
Hi Artem,

Can merge it next merge window. It's clean method for samsung socs and
no functional changes for others.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park

On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-28 at 11:03 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> Samsung SoCs use the own OneNAND controler and detect OneNAND chip at power on.
>> To use this feature, introduce the chip_probe function.
>>
>> Also remove workaround for Samsung SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>
> Pushed both to my l2-mtd-2.6.git / dunno.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
>
>
Artem Bityutskiy - July 8, 2010, 4:41 a.m.
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:50 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> Hi Artem,
> 
> Can merge it next merge window. It's clean method for samsung socs and
> no functional changes for others.

Hi,

I do not merge things, I'm just a "secretary" who picks up patches
and passes them to dwmw2. He merges those he approves. So, closer
to the merge window he should look at my l2 tree (he usually does)
and pick up your stuff.
Kyungmin Park - July 8, 2010, 4:43 a.m.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:50 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> Hi Artem,
>>
>> Can merge it next merge window. It's clean method for samsung socs and
>> no functional changes for others.
>
> Hi,
>
> I do not merge things, I'm just a "secretary" who picks up patches
> and passes them to dwmw2. He merges those he approves. So, closer
> to the merge window he should look at my l2 tree (he usually does)
> and pick up your stuff.

I see
At that time, I will notice again if it's missing.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
Kyungmin Park - Aug. 3, 2010, 3:44 a.m.
Hi,

Can you check it again?
It seems not merged at linux-next tree.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 09:50 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>> Hi Artem,
>>>
>>> Can merge it next merge window. It's clean method for samsung socs and
>>> no functional changes for others.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I do not merge things, I'm just a "secretary" who picks up patches
>> and passes them to dwmw2. He merges those he approves. So, closer
>> to the merge window he should look at my l2 tree (he usually does)
>> and pick up your stuff.
>
> I see
> At that time, I will notice again if it's missing.
>
> Thank you,
> Kyungmin Park
>
Artem Bityutskiy - Aug. 5, 2010, 4:59 a.m.
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 12:44 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can you check it again?
> It seems not merged at linux-next tree.

It is now in the mtd tree.

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
index 26caf25..0b12102 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
@@ -3730,17 +3730,16 @@  out:
 }
 
 /**
- * onenand_probe - [OneNAND Interface] Probe the OneNAND device
+ * onenand_chip_probe - [OneNAND Interface] The generic chip probe
  * @param mtd		MTD device structure
  *
  * OneNAND detection method:
  *   Compare the values from command with ones from register
  */
-static int onenand_probe(struct mtd_info *mtd)
+static int onenand_chip_probe(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 {
 	struct onenand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
-	int bram_maf_id, bram_dev_id, maf_id, dev_id, ver_id;
-	int density;
+	int bram_maf_id, bram_dev_id, maf_id, dev_id;
 	int syscfg;
 
 	/* Save system configuration 1 */
@@ -3763,12 +3762,6 @@  static int onenand_probe(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 	/* Restore system configuration 1 */
 	this->write_word(syscfg, this->base + ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1);
 
-	/* Workaround */
-	if (syscfg & ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_SYNC_WRITE) {
-		bram_maf_id = this->read_word(this->base + ONENAND_REG_MANUFACTURER_ID);
-		bram_dev_id = this->read_word(this->base + ONENAND_REG_DEVICE_ID);
-	}
-
 	/* Check manufacturer ID */
 	if (onenand_check_maf(bram_maf_id))
 		return -ENXIO;
@@ -3776,13 +3769,35 @@  static int onenand_probe(struct mtd_info *mtd)
 	/* Read manufacturer and device IDs from Register */
 	maf_id = this->read_word(this->base + ONENAND_REG_MANUFACTURER_ID);
 	dev_id = this->read_word(this->base + ONENAND_REG_DEVICE_ID);
-	ver_id = this->read_word(this->base + ONENAND_REG_VERSION_ID);
-	this->technology = this->read_word(this->base + ONENAND_REG_TECHNOLOGY);
 
 	/* Check OneNAND device */
 	if (maf_id != bram_maf_id || dev_id != bram_dev_id)
 		return -ENXIO;
 
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * onenand_probe - [OneNAND Interface] Probe the OneNAND device
+ * @param mtd		MTD device structure
+ */
+static int onenand_probe(struct mtd_info *mtd)
+{
+	struct onenand_chip *this = mtd->priv;
+	int maf_id, dev_id, ver_id;
+	int density;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = this->chip_probe(mtd);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Read manufacturer and device IDs from Register */
+	maf_id = this->read_word(this->base + ONENAND_REG_MANUFACTURER_ID);
+	dev_id = this->read_word(this->base + ONENAND_REG_DEVICE_ID);
+	ver_id = this->read_word(this->base + ONENAND_REG_VERSION_ID);
+	this->technology = this->read_word(this->base + ONENAND_REG_TECHNOLOGY);
+
 	/* Flash device information */
 	onenand_print_device_info(dev_id, ver_id);
 	this->device_id = dev_id;
@@ -3909,6 +3924,9 @@  int onenand_scan(struct mtd_info *mtd, int maxchips)
 	if (!this->unlock_all)
 		this->unlock_all = onenand_unlock_all;
 
+	if (!this->chip_probe)
+		this->chip_probe = onenand_chip_probe;
+
 	if (!this->read_bufferram)
 		this->read_bufferram = onenand_read_bufferram;
 	if (!this->write_bufferram)
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h b/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h
index c26ff86..0c8815b 100644
--- a/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h
+++ b/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@  struct onenand_bufferram {
  * @write_word:		[REPLACEABLE] hardware specific function for write
  *			register of OneNAND
  * @mmcontrol:		sync burst read function
+ * @chip_probe:		[REPLACEABLE] hardware specific function for chip probe
  * @block_markbad:	function to mark a block as bad
  * @scan_bbt:		[REPLACEALBE] hardware specific function for scanning
  *			Bad block Table
@@ -114,6 +115,7 @@  struct onenand_chip {
 	unsigned short (*read_word)(void __iomem *addr);
 	void (*write_word)(unsigned short value, void __iomem *addr);
 	void (*mmcontrol)(struct mtd_info *mtd, int sync_read);
+	int (*chip_probe)(struct mtd_info *mtd);
 	int (*block_markbad)(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs);
 	int (*scan_bbt)(struct mtd_info *mtd);