| Message ID | 1445829362-2738-7-git-send-email-weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| State | Not Applicable |
| Headers | show |
On 10/26/2015 02:15 PM, Wei Yang wrote: > VFs and their corresponding pci_dn instances are created and released > dynamically as their PF's SRIOV capability is enabled and disabled. > The patch creates and releases EEH devices for VFs when creating and > releasing their pci_dn instances, which means EEH devices and pci_dn > instances have same life cycle. Also, VF's EEH device is identified > by (struct eeh_dev::physfn). The add_dev_pci_data() helper (the one you hack) does not create pci_dn instances. The add_one_dev_pci_data() helper does. > > [gwshan: changelog and removed CONFIG_PCI_IOV] > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Acked-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 1 + > arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h > index c5eb86f..6c383ad 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h > @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ struct eeh_dev { > struct pci_controller *phb; /* Associated PHB */ > struct pci_dn *pdn; /* Associated PCI device node */ > struct pci_dev *pdev; /* Associated PCI device */ > + struct pci_dev *physfn; /* Associated PF PORT */ > struct pci_bus *bus; /* PCI bus for partial hotplug */ > }; > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c > index f771130..f0ddde7 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c > @@ -180,7 +180,9 @@ static struct pci_dn *add_one_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dn *parent, > struct pci_dn *add_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) > { > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV > + struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus); > struct pci_dn *parent, *pdn; > + struct eeh_dev *edev; > int i; > > /* Only support IOV for now */ > @@ -206,6 +208,9 @@ struct pci_dn *add_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) > __func__, i); > return NULL; > } > + eeh_dev_init(pdn, hose); > + edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn); In theory, pdn_to_eeh_dev() can return NULL. In this patch, it is not clear if pdn->edev gets initialized before or after add_dev_pci_data(). > + edev->physfn = pdev; > } > #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */ > > @@ -254,10 +259,17 @@ void remove_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) > for (i = 0; i < pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev); i++) { > list_for_each_entry_safe(pdn, tmp, > &parent->child_list, list) { > + struct eeh_dev *edev; > if (pdn->busno != pci_iov_virtfn_bus(pdev, i) || > pdn->devfn != pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(pdev, i)) > continue; > > + edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn); > + if (edev) { > + pdn->edev = NULL; > + kfree(edev); > + } > + > if (!list_empty(&pdn->list)) > list_del(&pdn->list); > >
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:33:49PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >On 10/26/2015 02:15 PM, Wei Yang wrote: >>VFs and their corresponding pci_dn instances are created and released >>dynamically as their PF's SRIOV capability is enabled and disabled. >>The patch creates and releases EEH devices for VFs when creating and >>releasing their pci_dn instances, which means EEH devices and pci_dn >>instances have same life cycle. Also, VF's EEH device is identified >>by (struct eeh_dev::physfn). > > >The add_dev_pci_data() helper (the one you hack) does not create pci_dn >instances. The add_one_dev_pci_data() helper does. > Yes, you are right. The patch here create edev after the pci_dn is created. So which part in the log you think is not accurate? > >> >>[gwshan: changelog and removed CONFIG_PCI_IOV] >>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>Acked-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>--- >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 1 + >> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) >> >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>index c5eb86f..6c383ad 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ struct eeh_dev { >> struct pci_controller *phb; /* Associated PHB */ >> struct pci_dn *pdn; /* Associated PCI device node */ >> struct pci_dev *pdev; /* Associated PCI device */ >>+ struct pci_dev *physfn; /* Associated PF PORT */ >> struct pci_bus *bus; /* PCI bus for partial hotplug */ >> }; >> >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>index f771130..f0ddde7 100644 >>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>@@ -180,7 +180,9 @@ static struct pci_dn *add_one_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dn *parent, >> struct pci_dn *add_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) >> { >> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV >>+ struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus); >> struct pci_dn *parent, *pdn; >>+ struct eeh_dev *edev; >> int i; >> >> /* Only support IOV for now */ >>@@ -206,6 +208,9 @@ struct pci_dn *add_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) >> __func__, i); >> return NULL; >> } >>+ eeh_dev_init(pdn, hose); >>+ edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn); > > >In theory, pdn_to_eeh_dev() can return NULL. In this patch, it is not clear >if pdn->edev gets initialized before or after add_dev_pci_data(). > Yep, the return value should be checked. pdn->edev is initialized in eeh_dev_init() which is called in add_dev_pci_data(). The order is not clear? > > >>+ edev->physfn = pdev; >> } >> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */ >> >>@@ -254,10 +259,17 @@ void remove_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) >> for (i = 0; i < pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev); i++) { >> list_for_each_entry_safe(pdn, tmp, >> &parent->child_list, list) { >>+ struct eeh_dev *edev; >> if (pdn->busno != pci_iov_virtfn_bus(pdev, i) || >> pdn->devfn != pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(pdev, i)) >> continue; >> >>+ edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn); >>+ if (edev) { >>+ pdn->edev = NULL; >>+ kfree(edev); >>+ } >>+ >> if (!list_empty(&pdn->list)) >> list_del(&pdn->list); >> >> > > >-- >Alexey >-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 10/30/2015 05:52 PM, Wei Yang wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:33:49PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >> On 10/26/2015 02:15 PM, Wei Yang wrote: >>> VFs and their corresponding pci_dn instances are created and released >>> dynamically as their PF's SRIOV capability is enabled and disabled. >>> The patch creates and releases EEH devices for VFs when creating and >>> releasing their pci_dn instances, which means EEH devices and pci_dn >>> instances have same life cycle. Also, VF's EEH device is identified >>> by (struct eeh_dev::physfn). >> >> >> The add_dev_pci_data() helper (the one you hack) does not create pci_dn >> instances. The add_one_dev_pci_data() helper does. >> > > Yes, you are right. The patch here create edev after the pci_dn is created. > > So which part in the log you think is not accurate? The commit log is ok, I just thought loud that eeh_dev_init() could go to add_one_dev_pci_data() to make things more clear. >> >>> >>> [gwshan: changelog and removed CONFIG_PCI_IOV] >>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>> Acked-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 1 + >>> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>> index c5eb86f..6c383ad 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>> @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ struct eeh_dev { >>> struct pci_controller *phb; /* Associated PHB */ >>> struct pci_dn *pdn; /* Associated PCI device node */ >>> struct pci_dev *pdev; /* Associated PCI device */ >>> + struct pci_dev *physfn; /* Associated PF PORT */ >>> struct pci_bus *bus; /* PCI bus for partial hotplug */ >>> }; >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>> index f771130..f0ddde7 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>> @@ -180,7 +180,9 @@ static struct pci_dn *add_one_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dn *parent, >>> struct pci_dn *add_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) >>> { >>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV >>> + struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus); >>> struct pci_dn *parent, *pdn; >>> + struct eeh_dev *edev; >>> int i; >>> >>> /* Only support IOV for now */ >>> @@ -206,6 +208,9 @@ struct pci_dn *add_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) >>> __func__, i); >>> return NULL; >>> } >>> + eeh_dev_init(pdn, hose); >>> + edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn); >> >> >> In theory, pdn_to_eeh_dev() can return NULL. In this patch, it is not clear >> if pdn->edev gets initialized before or after add_dev_pci_data(). >> > > Yep, the return value should be checked. May be BUG_ON will be enough, up to you. > > pdn->edev is initialized in eeh_dev_init() which is called in > add_dev_pci_data(). The order is not clear? > >> >> >>> + edev->physfn = pdev; >>> } >>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */ >>> >>> @@ -254,10 +259,17 @@ void remove_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) >>> for (i = 0; i < pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev); i++) { >>> list_for_each_entry_safe(pdn, tmp, >>> &parent->child_list, list) { >>> + struct eeh_dev *edev; >>> if (pdn->busno != pci_iov_virtfn_bus(pdev, i) || >>> pdn->devfn != pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(pdev, i)) >>> continue; >>> >>> + edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn); >>> + if (edev) { >>> + pdn->edev = NULL; >>> + kfree(edev); >>> + } >>> + >>> if (!list_empty(&pdn->list)) >>> list_del(&pdn->list); >>> >>> >>
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 06:36:01PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >On 10/30/2015 05:52 PM, Wei Yang wrote: >>On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:33:49PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>On 10/26/2015 02:15 PM, Wei Yang wrote: >>>>VFs and their corresponding pci_dn instances are created and released >>>>dynamically as their PF's SRIOV capability is enabled and disabled. >>>>The patch creates and releases EEH devices for VFs when creating and >>>>releasing their pci_dn instances, which means EEH devices and pci_dn >>>>instances have same life cycle. Also, VF's EEH device is identified >>>>by (struct eeh_dev::physfn). >>> >>> >>>The add_dev_pci_data() helper (the one you hack) does not create pci_dn >>>instances. The add_one_dev_pci_data() helper does. >>> >> >>Yes, you are right. The patch here create edev after the pci_dn is created. >> >>So which part in the log you think is not accurate? > > >The commit log is ok, I just thought loud that eeh_dev_init() could go to >add_one_dev_pci_data() to make things more clear. > I thought this is are good suggestion. My thought is, when we don't have VF, pci_dn and edev are two different thing. We create pci_dn first and then initialize the edev. So mix the initialization of them together is not that clear. Not sure you agree or not. > > >>> >>>> >>>>[gwshan: changelog and removed CONFIG_PCI_IOV] >>>>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>>>Acked-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>>>--- >>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h | 1 + >>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >>>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) >>>> >>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>>>index c5eb86f..6c383ad 100644 >>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h >>>>@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ struct eeh_dev { >>>> struct pci_controller *phb; /* Associated PHB */ >>>> struct pci_dn *pdn; /* Associated PCI device node */ >>>> struct pci_dev *pdev; /* Associated PCI device */ >>>>+ struct pci_dev *physfn; /* Associated PF PORT */ >>>> struct pci_bus *bus; /* PCI bus for partial hotplug */ >>>> }; >>>> >>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>>>index f771130..f0ddde7 100644 >>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c >>>>@@ -180,7 +180,9 @@ static struct pci_dn *add_one_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dn *parent, >>>> struct pci_dn *add_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) >>>> { >>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV >>>>+ struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus); >>>> struct pci_dn *parent, *pdn; >>>>+ struct eeh_dev *edev; >>>> int i; >>>> >>>> /* Only support IOV for now */ >>>>@@ -206,6 +208,9 @@ struct pci_dn *add_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) >>>> __func__, i); >>>> return NULL; >>>> } >>>>+ eeh_dev_init(pdn, hose); >>>>+ edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn); >>> >>> >>>In theory, pdn_to_eeh_dev() can return NULL. In this patch, it is not clear >>>if pdn->edev gets initialized before or after add_dev_pci_data(). >>> >> >>Yep, the return value should be checked. > >May be BUG_ON will be enough, up to you. > Yep, thanks. > >> >>pdn->edev is initialized in eeh_dev_init() which is called in >>add_dev_pci_data(). The order is not clear? >> >>> >>> >>>>+ edev->physfn = pdev; >>>> } >>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */ >>>> >>>>@@ -254,10 +259,17 @@ void remove_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) >>>> for (i = 0; i < pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev); i++) { >>>> list_for_each_entry_safe(pdn, tmp, >>>> &parent->child_list, list) { >>>>+ struct eeh_dev *edev; >>>> if (pdn->busno != pci_iov_virtfn_bus(pdev, i) || >>>> pdn->devfn != pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(pdev, i)) >>>> continue; >>>> >>>>+ edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn); >>>>+ if (edev) { >>>>+ pdn->edev = NULL; >>>>+ kfree(edev); >>>>+ } >>>>+ >>>> if (!list_empty(&pdn->list)) >>>> list_del(&pdn->list); >>>> >>>> >>> > > >-- >Alexey
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h index c5eb86f..6c383ad 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ struct eeh_dev { struct pci_controller *phb; /* Associated PHB */ struct pci_dn *pdn; /* Associated PCI device node */ struct pci_dev *pdev; /* Associated PCI device */ + struct pci_dev *physfn; /* Associated PF PORT */ struct pci_bus *bus; /* PCI bus for partial hotplug */ }; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c index f771130..f0ddde7 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_dn.c @@ -180,7 +180,9 @@ static struct pci_dn *add_one_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dn *parent, struct pci_dn *add_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) { #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV + struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus); struct pci_dn *parent, *pdn; + struct eeh_dev *edev; int i; /* Only support IOV for now */ @@ -206,6 +208,9 @@ struct pci_dn *add_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) __func__, i); return NULL; } + eeh_dev_init(pdn, hose); + edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn); + edev->physfn = pdev; } #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */ @@ -254,10 +259,17 @@ void remove_dev_pci_data(struct pci_dev *pdev) for (i = 0; i < pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev); i++) { list_for_each_entry_safe(pdn, tmp, &parent->child_list, list) { + struct eeh_dev *edev; if (pdn->busno != pci_iov_virtfn_bus(pdev, i) || pdn->devfn != pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(pdev, i)) continue; + edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn); + if (edev) { + pdn->edev = NULL; + kfree(edev); + } + if (!list_empty(&pdn->list)) list_del(&pdn->list);