diff mbox

[stable<3.19] net: handle null iovec pointer in skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec()

Message ID 20151023084609.585AEA0C18@unicorn.suse.cz
State Not Applicable, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Michal Kubecek Oct. 23, 2015, 8:46 a.m. UTC
Mainline commit 89c22d8c3b27 ("net: Fix skb csum races when peeking")
backport into pre-3.19 stable kernels introduces a regression causing
null pointer dererefence in skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec().

This commit only sets CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY for non-shared skb, allowing
udp_recvmsg() to take the "else" branch of if (skb_csum_unnecessary(skb))
when called with null iovec (and len=0, e.g. when peeking for datagram
size first). The problem is that unlike skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_msg()
called in this path since 3.19, skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec() does
not handle null iov parameter and always dereferences iov->iov_len. This
is especially harmful when udp_recvmsg() is called in kernel context,
e.g. from kernel nfsd.

Band-aid skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec() by testing iov for null and
only checking the checksum in this case.

Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
---
 net/core/datagram.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

Comments

Sabrina Dubroca Oct. 23, 2015, 9:22 a.m. UTC | #1
Hello Michal,

2015-10-23, 10:46:09 +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> Mainline commit 89c22d8c3b27 ("net: Fix skb csum races when peeking")
> backport into pre-3.19 stable kernels introduces a regression causing
> null pointer dererefence in skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec().
> 
> This commit only sets CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY for non-shared skb, allowing
> udp_recvmsg() to take the "else" branch of if (skb_csum_unnecessary(skb))
> when called with null iovec (and len=0, e.g. when peeking for datagram
> size first). The problem is that unlike skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_msg()
> called in this path since 3.19, skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec() does
> not handle null iov parameter and always dereferences iov->iov_len. This
> is especially harmful when udp_recvmsg() is called in kernel context,
> e.g. from kernel nfsd.
> 
> Band-aid skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec() by testing iov for null and
> only checking the checksum in this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
> ---

I ran into this problem too and that was my initial solution to this
problem as well, but actually, we need a more complete fix, like the
one I submitted a few days ago:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/530642/

With your solution, userspace can still receive bogus EFAULT, or the
kernel ends up writing data to an unwanted memory location.


Thanks,
Michal Kubecek Oct. 23, 2015, 9:39 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:22:19AM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> Hello Michal,
> 
> 2015-10-23, 10:46:09 +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> > Mainline commit 89c22d8c3b27 ("net: Fix skb csum races when peeking")
> > backport into pre-3.19 stable kernels introduces a regression causing
> > null pointer dererefence in skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec().
> > 
> > This commit only sets CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY for non-shared skb, allowing
> > udp_recvmsg() to take the "else" branch of if (skb_csum_unnecessary(skb))
> > when called with null iovec (and len=0, e.g. when peeking for datagram
> > size first). The problem is that unlike skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_msg()
> > called in this path since 3.19, skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec() does
> > not handle null iov parameter and always dereferences iov->iov_len. This
> > is especially harmful when udp_recvmsg() is called in kernel context,
> > e.g. from kernel nfsd.
> > 
> > Band-aid skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec() by testing iov for null and
> > only checking the checksum in this case.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
> > ---
> 
> I ran into this problem too and that was my initial solution to this
> problem as well, but actually, we need a more complete fix, like the
> one I submitted a few days ago:
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/530642/
> 
> With your solution, userspace can still receive bogus EFAULT, or the
> kernel ends up writing data to an unwanted memory location.

I must admit I wondered why skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec() doesn't
get (and check) read length and why it cannot overfill the buffer. But
then I saw the comment "Caller _must_ check that skb will fit to this
iovec", stopped thinking and assumed it's OK. I guess I should be less
trusting... :-(

Thank you for the warning.

                                                        Michal Kubecek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Luis Henriques Oct. 26, 2015, 11:25 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:39:46AM +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:22:19AM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > Hello Michal,
> > 
> > 2015-10-23, 10:46:09 +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> > > Mainline commit 89c22d8c3b27 ("net: Fix skb csum races when peeking")
> > > backport into pre-3.19 stable kernels introduces a regression causing
> > > null pointer dererefence in skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec().
> > > 
> > > This commit only sets CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY for non-shared skb, allowing
> > > udp_recvmsg() to take the "else" branch of if (skb_csum_unnecessary(skb))
> > > when called with null iovec (and len=0, e.g. when peeking for datagram
> > > size first). The problem is that unlike skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_msg()
> > > called in this path since 3.19, skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec() does
> > > not handle null iov parameter and always dereferences iov->iov_len. This
> > > is especially harmful when udp_recvmsg() is called in kernel context,
> > > e.g. from kernel nfsd.
> > > 
> > > Band-aid skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec() by testing iov for null and
> > > only checking the checksum in this case.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>
> > > ---
> > 
> > I ran into this problem too and that was my initial solution to this
> > problem as well, but actually, we need a more complete fix, like the
> > one I submitted a few days ago:
> > 
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/530642/
> > 
> > With your solution, userspace can still receive bogus EFAULT, or the
> > kernel ends up writing data to an unwanted memory location.
> 
> I must admit I wondered why skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec() doesn't
> get (and check) read length and why it cannot overfill the buffer. But
> then I saw the comment "Caller _must_ check that skb will fit to this
> iovec", stopped thinking and assumed it's OK. I guess I should be less
> trusting... :-(
> 
> Thank you for the warning.
> 
>                                                         Michal Kubecek

I can confirm that we had this issue reported in our kernels too
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508510).  I'll queue Sabrina's patch for
the next 3.16 stable kernel release.  Thanks a lot!


Cheers,
--
Luís
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/net/core/datagram.c b/net/core/datagram.c
index 3a402a7b20e9..f8b38794fa9b 100644
--- a/net/core/datagram.c
+++ b/net/core/datagram.c
@@ -799,6 +799,13 @@  int skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (!chunk)
 		return 0;
 
+	if (!iov) {
+		if (__skb_checksum_complete(skb))
+			goto csum_error;
+		else
+			return 0;
+	}
+
 	/* Skip filled elements.
 	 * Pretty silly, look at memcpy_toiovec, though 8)
 	 */