diff mbox

[v5,3/3] kvm: Pass PCI device pointer to MSI routing functions

Message ID 563ff802708c96d128f2d0dda662433044c987ea.1444906971.git.p.fedin@samsung.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Pavel Fedin Oct. 15, 2015, 11:05 a.m. UTC 
In-kernel ITS emulation on ARM64 will require to supply requester IDs.
These IDs can now be retrieved from the device pointer using new
pci_requester_id() function.

This patch adds pci_dev pointer to KVM GSI routing functions and makes
callers passing it.

x86 architecture does not use requester IDs, but hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c
also made passing PCI device pointer instead of NULL for consistency with
the rest of the code.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
---
 hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c |  9 +++++----
 hw/vfio/pci.c            | 11 ++++++-----
 hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c   |  5 +++--
 include/sysemu/kvm.h     |  5 +++--
 kvm-all.c                |  5 +++--
 kvm-stub.c               |  5 +++--
 6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Comments

Cornelia Huck Oct. 15, 2015, 11:41 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:05:17 +0300
Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com> wrote:

> In-kernel ITS emulation on ARM64 will require to supply requester IDs.
> These IDs can now be retrieved from the device pointer using new
> pci_requester_id() function.
> 
> This patch adds pci_dev pointer to KVM GSI routing functions and makes
> callers passing it.

Should the pci_dev be passed to kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route() as well?
Currently, the only implementer of this function (s390x) does not need
it; but it shouldn't hurt?

> 
> x86 architecture does not use requester IDs, but hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c
> also made passing PCI device pointer instead of NULL for consistency with
> the rest of the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
> ---
>  hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c |  9 +++++----
>  hw/vfio/pci.c            | 11 ++++++-----
>  hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c   |  5 +++--
>  include/sysemu/kvm.h     |  5 +++--
>  kvm-all.c                |  5 +++--
>  kvm-stub.c               |  5 +++--
>  6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Pavel Fedin Oct. 15, 2015, 11:59 a.m. UTC | #2 
Hello!

> Should the pci_dev be passed to kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route() as well?
> Currently, the only implementer of this function (s390x) does not need
> it; but it shouldn't hurt?

 Yes, it shouldn't. I didn't pass it there exactly because of this reason. However, &kroute is also passed to this function, so
setting ARM-specific data could be moved there. I mean this repeating sequence (see vITS RFC 4/6 -
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-09/msg07075.html):
--- cut ---
    kroute.flags = kvm_msi_flags;
    if (kroute.flags & KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID) {
        kroute.u.msi.devid = pci_requester_id(dev);
    }
--- cut ---

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c b/hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c
index e48cae6..6c33af0 100644
--- a/hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c
+++ b/hw/i386/kvm/pci-assign.c
@@ -979,7 +979,7 @@  static void assigned_dev_update_msi(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
         MSIMessage msg = msi_get_message(pci_dev, 0);
         int virq;
 
-        virq = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(kvm_state, msg);
+        virq = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(kvm_state, msg, pci_dev);
         if (virq < 0) {
             perror("assigned_dev_update_msi: kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route");
             return;
@@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@  static void assigned_dev_update_msi_msg(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
     }
 
     kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(kvm_state, assigned_dev->msi_virq[0],
-                                 msi_get_message(pci_dev, 0));
+                                 msi_get_message(pci_dev, 0), pci_dev);
 }
 
 static bool assigned_dev_msix_masked(MSIXTableEntry *entry)
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@  static int assigned_dev_update_msix_mmio(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
 
         msg.address = entry->addr_lo | ((uint64_t)entry->addr_hi << 32);
         msg.data = entry->data;
-        r = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(kvm_state, msg);
+        r = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(kvm_state, msg, pci_dev);
         if (r < 0) {
             return r;
         }
@@ -1602,7 +1602,8 @@  static void assigned_dev_msix_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
                 msg.data = entry->data;
 
                 ret = kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(kvm_state,
-                                                   adev->msi_virq[i], msg);
+                                                   adev->msi_virq[i], msg,
+                                                   pci_dev);
                 if (ret) {
                     error_report("Error updating irq routing entry (%d)", ret);
                 }
diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
index dcabb6d..8fadbcf 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@  static void vfio_add_kvm_msi_virq(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, VFIOMSIVector *vector,
         return;
     }
 
-    virq = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(kvm_state, *msg);
+    virq = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(kvm_state, *msg, &vdev->pdev);
     if (virq < 0) {
         event_notifier_cleanup(&vector->kvm_interrupt);
         return;
@@ -449,9 +449,10 @@  static void vfio_remove_kvm_msi_virq(VFIOMSIVector *vector)
     event_notifier_cleanup(&vector->kvm_interrupt);
 }
 
-static void vfio_update_kvm_msi_virq(VFIOMSIVector *vector, MSIMessage msg)
+static void vfio_update_kvm_msi_virq(VFIOMSIVector *vector, MSIMessage msg,
+                                     PCIDevice *pdev)
 {
-    kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(kvm_state, vector->virq, msg);
+    kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(kvm_state, vector->virq, msg, pdev);
 }
 
 static int vfio_msix_vector_do_use(PCIDevice *pdev, unsigned int nr,
@@ -486,7 +487,7 @@  static int vfio_msix_vector_do_use(PCIDevice *pdev, unsigned int nr,
         if (!msg) {
             vfio_remove_kvm_msi_virq(vector);
         } else {
-            vfio_update_kvm_msi_virq(vector, *msg);
+            vfio_update_kvm_msi_virq(vector, *msg, pdev);
         }
     } else {
         vfio_add_kvm_msi_virq(vdev, vector, msg, true);
@@ -760,7 +761,7 @@  static void vfio_update_msi(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
         }
 
         msg = msi_get_message(&vdev->pdev, i);
-        vfio_update_kvm_msi_virq(vector, msg);
+        vfio_update_kvm_msi_virq(vector, msg, &vdev->pdev);
     }
 }
 
diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
index e5c406d..f55dd2b 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@  static int kvm_virtio_pci_vq_vector_use(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy,
     int ret;
 
     if (irqfd->users == 0) {
-        ret = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(kvm_state, msg);
+        ret = kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(kvm_state, msg, &proxy->pci_dev);
         if (ret < 0) {
             return ret;
         }
@@ -726,7 +726,8 @@  static int virtio_pci_vq_vector_unmask(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy,
     if (proxy->vector_irqfd) {
         irqfd = &proxy->vector_irqfd[vector];
         if (irqfd->msg.data != msg.data || irqfd->msg.address != msg.address) {
-            ret = kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(kvm_state, irqfd->virq, msg);
+            ret = kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(kvm_state, irqfd->virq, msg,
+                                               &proxy->pci_dev);
             if (ret < 0) {
                 return ret;
             }
diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
index d42c464..4d26571 100644
--- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
+++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
@@ -447,8 +447,9 @@  static inline void cpu_clean_state(CPUState *cpu)
     }
 }
 
-int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg);
-int kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(KVMState *s, int virq, MSIMessage msg);
+int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg, PCIDevice *dev);
+int kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(KVMState *s, int virq, MSIMessage msg,
+                                 PCIDevice *dev);
 void kvm_irqchip_release_virq(KVMState *s, int virq);
 
 int kvm_irqchip_add_adapter_route(KVMState *s, AdapterInfo *adapter);
diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
index 4931b27..4632138 100644
--- a/kvm-all.c
+++ b/kvm-all.c
@@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@  int kvm_irqchip_send_msi(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg)
     return kvm_set_irq(s, route->kroute.gsi, 1);
 }
 
-int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg)
+int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg, PCIDevice *dev)
 {
     struct kvm_irq_routing_entry kroute = {};
     int virq;
@@ -1224,7 +1224,8 @@  int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg)
     return virq;
 }
 
-int kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(KVMState *s, int virq, MSIMessage msg)
+int kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(KVMState *s, int virq, MSIMessage msg,
+                                 PCIDevice *dev)
 {
     struct kvm_irq_routing_entry kroute = {};
 
diff --git a/kvm-stub.c b/kvm-stub.c
index d9ad624..08bcc32 100644
--- a/kvm-stub.c
+++ b/kvm-stub.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@  int kvm_on_sigbus(int code, void *addr)
 }
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
-int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg)
+int kvm_irqchip_add_msi_route(KVMState *s, MSIMessage msg, PCIDevice *dev)
 {
     return -ENOSYS;
 }
@@ -128,7 +128,8 @@  void kvm_irqchip_release_virq(KVMState *s, int virq)
 {
 }
 
-int kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(KVMState *s, int virq, MSIMessage msg)
+int kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route(KVMState *s, int virq, MSIMessage msg,
+                                 PCIDevice *dev)
 {
     return -ENOSYS;
 }