Message ID | m2a8rs7crl.wl@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | RFC, archived |
Delegated to: | David Miller |
Headers | show |
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:54:22PM +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote: > > Hello David, > > At Mon, 5 Oct 2015 08:32:51 -0600, > David Ahern wrote: > > > > > diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c > > index 30caa289c5db..5cedfda4b241 100644 > > --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c > > +++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c > > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *xfrm6_dst_lookup(struct net *net, int tos, int oif, > > > > memset(&fl6, 0, sizeof(fl6)); > > fl6.flowi6_oif = oif; > > + fl6.flowi6_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF; > > memcpy(&fl6.daddr, daddr, sizeof(fl6.daddr)); > > if (saddr) > > memcpy(&fl6.saddr, saddr, sizeof(fl6.saddr)); > > I found that this fix is still not sufficient with the mip6 > (Mobile IPv6) use case. It does not even fix the vti case. The behaviour of the vti devices is the same, with and without the patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 10/9/15 1:17 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote: > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:54:22PM +0900, Hajime Tazaki wrote: >> >> Hello David, >> >> At Mon, 5 Oct 2015 08:32:51 -0600, >> David Ahern wrote: >> >>> >>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c >>> index 30caa289c5db..5cedfda4b241 100644 >>> --- a/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c >>> +++ b/net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c >>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *xfrm6_dst_lookup(struct net *net, int tos, int oif, >>> >>> memset(&fl6, 0, sizeof(fl6)); >>> fl6.flowi6_oif = oif; >>> + fl6.flowi6_flags = FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF; >>> memcpy(&fl6.daddr, daddr, sizeof(fl6.daddr)); >>> if (saddr) >>> memcpy(&fl6.saddr, saddr, sizeof(fl6.saddr)); >> >> I found that this fix is still not sufficient with the mip6 >> (Mobile IPv6) use case. > > It does not even fix the vti case. The behaviour of the vti devices is > the same, with and without the patch. > I goofed this patch was on top of my IPv6 VRF patches. You need the FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF bits from: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg346860.html Let me cook up a patch based on Linus' tree which is where it is needed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c index 8c0898796ffb..0aba308b5ea3 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c @@ -1169,9 +1169,9 @@ struct dst_entry *ip6_route_output(struct net *net, const struct sock *sk, fl6->flowi6_iif = LOOPBACK_IFINDEX; - if ((sk && sk->sk_bound_dev_if) || rt6_need_strict(&fl6->daddr)) + if ((sk && sk->sk_bound_dev_if) || rt6_need_strict(&fl6->daddr) || + (!(fl6->flowi6_flags & FLOWI_FLAG_SKIP_NH_OIF) && fl6->flowi6_oif)) flags |= RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE; if (!ipv6_addr_any(&fl6->saddr)) flags |= RT6_LOOKUP_F_HAS_SADDR; else if (sk)