UBUNTU: Enable perf tools on armel

Signed-off-by: Loïc Minier <loic.minier@ubuntu.com>
---
 debian.master/rules.d/armel.mk |    2 --
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

On 05/14/2010 09:55 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Loïc Minier<loic.minier@ubuntu.com>
> ---
>   debian.master/rules.d/armel.mk |    2 --
>   1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/debian.master/rules.d/armel.mk b/debian.master/rules.d/armel.mk
> index 2924a39..79428e3 100644
> --- a/debian.master/rules.d/armel.mk
> +++ b/debian.master/rules.d/armel.mk
> @@ -7,7 +7,5 @@ build_image	= zImage
>   kernel_file	= arch/$(build_arch)/boot/zImage
>   install_file	= vmlinuz
>   no_dumpfile = true
> -# ARM is not a supported architecture in perf userspace
> -do_tools	= false
>
>   loader		= grub

I assume this is for Maverick? If so,

Acked-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com>

On Fri, May 14, 2010, Tim Gardner wrote:
> >-# ARM is not a supported architecture in perf userspace
> >-do_tools	= false
> I assume this is for Maverick? If so,

 Correct

 BTW I was told this build, but didn't verify myself

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 05:43:45PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010, Tim Gardner wrote:
> > >-# ARM is not a supported architecture in perf userspace
> > >-do_tools	= false
> > I assume this is for Maverick? If so,
> 
>  Correct
> 
>  BTW I was told this build, but didn't verify myself

Leann, as I have a work item to investigate this I'll get this one
tested with Lioc and report back.

-apw

On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 07:18:53AM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 05:43:45PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > On Fri, May 14, 2010, Tim Gardner wrote:
> > > >-# ARM is not a supported architecture in perf userspace
> > > >-do_tools	= false
> > > I assume this is for Maverick? If so,
> > 
> >  Correct
> > 
> >  BTW I was told this build, but didn't verify myself
> 
> Leann, as I have a work item to investigate this I'll get this one
> tested with Lioc and report back.

Ok, after much futzing about I managed to get a build environment setup
which could actually build the binary programs part and we ended up with
a linux-tools for armel on versatile.  So I am happy that this should
not cause an FTBS for armel.  With that I suggest we get this applied to
it can be tested in the real builds:

Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>

-apw

Applied to Maverick master.

Thanks,
Leann