Message ID | 1443655417-14689-4-git-send-email-vz@mleia.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | d54e88011d0a5fb48d9bb60fede3e83375c75841 |
Headers | show |
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c index a9e8a02..cbf4501 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ * slc_tac register definitions **********************************************************************/ /* Computation of clock cycles on basis of controller and device clock rates */ -#define SLCTAC_CLOCKS(c, n, s) (min_t(u32, 1 + (c / n), 0xF) << s) +#define SLCTAC_CLOCKS(c, n, s) (min_t(u32, DIV_ROUND_UP(c, n) - 1, 0xF) << s) /* Clock setting for RDY write sample wait time in 2*n clocks */ #define SLCTAC_WDR(n) (((n) & 0xF) << 28)
According to LPC32xx User's Manual all values measured in clock cycles are programmable from 1 to 16 clocks (4 bits) starting from 0 in bitfield, the current version of calculated clock cycles is too conservative. Correctness of 0 bitfield value (i.e. programmed 1 clock timing) is proven with actual NAND chip devices. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> --- Changes from v2 to v1: * use less conservative "DIV_ROUND_UP(c, n) - 1" construction instead of "c / n" drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)