@@ -1870,6 +1870,11 @@ GLIBCXX_3.4.22 {
# std::uncaught_exceptions()
_ZSt19uncaught_exceptionsv;
+ extern "C++"
+ {
+ std::__detail::_Power2_rehash_policy::*;
+ };
+
} GLIBCXX_3.4.21;
# Symbols in the support library (libsupc++) have their own tag.
@@ -457,6 +457,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
/// smallest prime that keeps the load factor small enough.
struct _Prime_rehash_policy
{
+ using __has_load_factor = std::true_type;
+
_Prime_rehash_policy(float __z = 1.0) noexcept
: _M_max_load_factor(__z), _M_next_resize(0) { }
@@ -501,6 +503,69 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
mutable std::size_t _M_next_resize;
};
+ /// Range hashing function considering that second args is a power of 2.
+ struct _Mask_range_hashing
+ {
+ typedef std::size_t first_argument_type;
+ typedef std::size_t second_argument_type;
+ typedef std::size_t result_type;
+
+ result_type
+ operator()(first_argument_type __num,
+ second_argument_type __den) const noexcept
+ { return __num & (__den - 1); }
+ };
+
+ /// Rehash policy providing power of 2 bucket numbers. Ease modulo
+ /// operations.
+ struct _Power2_rehash_policy
+ {
+ using __has_load_factor = std::true_type;
+
+ _Power2_rehash_policy(float __z = 1.0) noexcept
+ : _M_max_load_factor(__z), _M_next_resize(0) { }
+
+ float
+ max_load_factor() const noexcept
+ { return _M_max_load_factor; }
+
+ // Return a bucket size no smaller than n.
+ std::size_t
+ _M_next_bkt(std::size_t __n) const;
+
+ // Return a bucket count appropriate for n elements
+ std::size_t
+ _M_bkt_for_elements(std::size_t __n) const
+ { return __builtin_ceil(__n / (long double)_M_max_load_factor); }
+
+ // __n_bkt is current bucket count, __n_elt is current element count,
+ // and __n_ins is number of elements to be inserted. Do we need to
+ // increase bucket count? If so, return make_pair(true, n), where n
+ // is the new bucket count. If not, return make_pair(false, 0).
+ std::pair<bool, std::size_t>
+ _M_need_rehash(std::size_t __n_bkt, std::size_t __n_elt,
+ std::size_t __n_ins) const;
+
+ typedef std::size_t _State;
+
+ _State
+ _M_state() const
+ { return _M_next_resize; }
+
+ void
+ _M_reset() noexcept
+ { _M_next_resize = 0; }
+
+ void
+ _M_reset(_State __state)
+ { _M_next_resize = __state; }
+
+ static const std::size_t _S_growth_factor = 2;
+
+ float _M_max_load_factor;
+ mutable std::size_t _M_next_resize;
+ };
+
// Base classes for std::_Hashtable. We define these base classes
// because in some cases we want to do different things depending on
// the value of a policy class. In some cases the policy class
@@ -775,8 +840,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
typename _ExtractKey, typename _Equal,
typename _H1, typename _H2, typename _Hash,
typename _RehashPolicy, typename _Traits,
- bool _Constant_iterators = _Traits::__constant_iterators::value,
- bool _Unique_keys = _Traits::__unique_keys::value>
+ bool _Constant_iterators = _Traits::__constant_iterators::value>
struct _Insert;
/// Specialization.
@@ -785,65 +849,30 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
typename _H1, typename _H2, typename _Hash,
typename _RehashPolicy, typename _Traits>
struct _Insert<_Key, _Value, _Alloc, _ExtractKey, _Equal, _H1, _H2, _Hash,
- _RehashPolicy, _Traits, true, true>
+ _RehashPolicy, _Traits, true>
: public _Insert_base<_Key, _Value, _Alloc, _ExtractKey, _Equal,
_H1, _H2, _Hash, _RehashPolicy, _Traits>
{
using __base_type = _Insert_base<_Key, _Value, _Alloc, _ExtractKey,
_Equal, _H1, _H2, _Hash,
_RehashPolicy, _Traits>;
- using value_type = typename __base_type::value_type;
- using iterator = typename __base_type::iterator;
- using const_iterator = typename __base_type::const_iterator;
-
- using __unique_keys = typename __base_type::__unique_keys;
- using __hashtable = typename __base_type::__hashtable;
- using __node_gen_type = typename __base_type::__node_gen_type;
-
- using __base_type::insert;
- std::pair<iterator, bool>
- insert(value_type&& __v)
- {
- __hashtable& __h = this->_M_conjure_hashtable();
- __node_gen_type __node_gen(__h);
- return __h._M_insert(std::move(__v), __node_gen, __unique_keys());
- }
-
- iterator
- insert(const_iterator __hint, value_type&& __v)
- {
- __hashtable& __h = this->_M_conjure_hashtable();
- __node_gen_type __node_gen(__h);
- return __h._M_insert(__hint, std::move(__v), __node_gen,
- __unique_keys());
- }
- };
+ using __hashtable_base = _Hashtable_base<_Key, _Value, _ExtractKey,
+ _Equal, _H1, _H2, _Hash,
+ _Traits>;
- /// Specialization.
- template<typename _Key, typename _Value, typename _Alloc,
- typename _ExtractKey, typename _Equal,
- typename _H1, typename _H2, typename _Hash,
- typename _RehashPolicy, typename _Traits>
- struct _Insert<_Key, _Value, _Alloc, _ExtractKey, _Equal, _H1, _H2, _Hash,
- _RehashPolicy, _Traits, true, false>
- : public _Insert_base<_Key, _Value, _Alloc, _ExtractKey, _Equal,
- _H1, _H2, _Hash, _RehashPolicy, _Traits>
- {
- using __base_type = _Insert_base<_Key, _Value, _Alloc, _ExtractKey,
- _Equal, _H1, _H2, _Hash,
- _RehashPolicy, _Traits>;
using value_type = typename __base_type::value_type;
using iterator = typename __base_type::iterator;
using const_iterator = typename __base_type::const_iterator;
using __unique_keys = typename __base_type::__unique_keys;
+ using __ireturn_type = typename __hashtable_base::__ireturn_type;
using __hashtable = typename __base_type::__hashtable;
using __node_gen_type = typename __base_type::__node_gen_type;
using __base_type::insert;
- iterator
+ __ireturn_type
insert(value_type&& __v)
{
__hashtable& __h = this->_M_conjure_hashtable();
@@ -865,9 +894,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
template<typename _Key, typename _Value, typename _Alloc,
typename _ExtractKey, typename _Equal,
typename _H1, typename _H2, typename _Hash,
- typename _RehashPolicy, typename _Traits, bool _Unique_keys>
+ typename _RehashPolicy, typename _Traits>
struct _Insert<_Key, _Value, _Alloc, _ExtractKey, _Equal, _H1, _H2, _Hash,
- _RehashPolicy, _Traits, false, _Unique_keys>
+ _RehashPolicy, _Traits, false>
: public _Insert_base<_Key, _Value, _Alloc, _ExtractKey, _Equal,
_H1, _H2, _Hash, _RehashPolicy, _Traits>
{
@@ -911,28 +940,46 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
}
};
+ template<typename _Policy>
+ using __has_load_factor = typename _Policy::__has_load_factor;
+
/**
* Primary class template _Rehash_base.
*
* Give hashtable the max_load_factor functions and reserve iff the
- * rehash policy is _Prime_rehash_policy.
+ * rehash policy supports it.
*/
template<typename _Key, typename _Value, typename _Alloc,
typename _ExtractKey, typename _Equal,
typename _H1, typename _H2, typename _Hash,
- typename _RehashPolicy, typename _Traits>
+ typename _RehashPolicy, typename _Traits,
+ typename =
+ __detected_or_t<std::false_type, __has_load_factor, _RehashPolicy>>
struct _Rehash_base;
- /// Specialization.
+ /// Specialization when rehash policy doesn't provide load factor management.
template<typename _Key, typename _Value, typename _Alloc,
typename _ExtractKey, typename _Equal,
- typename _H1, typename _H2, typename _Hash, typename _Traits>
+ typename _H1, typename _H2, typename _Hash,
+ typename _RehashPolicy, typename _Traits>
+ struct _Rehash_base<_Key, _Value, _Alloc, _ExtractKey, _Equal,
+ _H1, _H2, _Hash, _RehashPolicy, _Traits,
+ std::false_type>
+ {
+ };
+
+ /// Specialization when rehash policy provide load factor management.
+ template<typename _Key, typename _Value, typename _Alloc,
+ typename _ExtractKey, typename _Equal,
+ typename _H1, typename _H2, typename _Hash,
+ typename _RehashPolicy, typename _Traits>
struct _Rehash_base<_Key, _Value, _Alloc, _ExtractKey, _Equal,
- _H1, _H2, _Hash, _Prime_rehash_policy, _Traits>
+ _H1, _H2, _Hash, _RehashPolicy, _Traits,
+ std::true_type>
{
using __hashtable = _Hashtable<_Key, _Value, _Alloc, _ExtractKey,
_Equal, _H1, _H2, _Hash,
- _Prime_rehash_policy, _Traits>;
+ _RehashPolicy, _Traits>;
float
max_load_factor() const noexcept
@@ -945,7 +992,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
max_load_factor(float __z)
{
__hashtable* __this = static_cast<__hashtable*>(this);
- __this->__rehash_policy(_Prime_rehash_policy(__z));
+ __this->__rehash_policy(_RehashPolicy(__z));
}
void
@@ -32,6 +32,81 @@
#include <ext/alloc_traits.h>
#include <bits/hashtable_policy.h>
+namespace
+{
+ const unsigned long __power2_list[] = // 32 or 64
+ {
+ 1ul << 0,
+ 1ul << 1,
+ 1ul << 2,
+ 1ul << 3,
+ 1ul << 4,
+ 1ul << 5,
+ 1ul << 6,
+ 1ul << 7,
+ 1ul << 8,
+ 1ul << 9,
+ 1ul << 10,
+ 1ul << 11,
+ 1ul << 12,
+ 1ul << 13,
+ 1ul << 14,
+ 1ul << 15,
+ 1ul << 16,
+ 1ul << 17,
+ 1ul << 18,
+ 1ul << 19,
+ 1ul << 20,
+ 1ul << 21,
+ 1ul << 22,
+ 1ul << 23,
+ 1ul << 24,
+ 1ul << 25,
+ 1ul << 26,
+ 1ul << 27,
+ 1ul << 28,
+ 1ul << 29,
+ 1ul << 30,
+ 1ul << 31,
+#if __SIZEOF_LONG__ != 8
+ 1ul << 32
+#else
+ 1ul << 32,
+ 1ul << 33,
+ 1ul << 34,
+ 1ul << 35,
+ 1ul << 36,
+ 1ul << 37,
+ 1ul << 38,
+ 1ul << 39,
+ 1ul << 40,
+ 1ul << 41,
+ 1ul << 42,
+ 1ul << 43,
+ 1ul << 44,
+ 1ul << 45,
+ 1ul << 46,
+ 1ul << 47,
+ 1ul << 48,
+ 1ul << 49,
+ 1ul << 50,
+ 1ul << 51,
+ 1ul << 52,
+ 1ul << 53,
+ 1ul << 54,
+ 1ul << 55,
+ 1ul << 56,
+ 1ul << 57,
+ 1ul << 58,
+ 1ul << 59,
+ 1ul << 60,
+ 1ul << 61,
+ 1ul << 62,
+ 1ul << 63
+#endif
+ };
+}
+
namespace std _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(default)
{
#include "../shared/hashtable-aux.cc"
@@ -96,6 +171,62 @@ namespace __detail
return std::make_pair(false, 0);
}
+ // Return a prime no smaller than n.
+ std::size_t
+ _Power2_rehash_policy::_M_next_bkt(std::size_t __n) const
+ {
+ // Optimize lookups involving the first elements of __prime_list.
+ // (useful to speed-up, eg, constructors)
+ static const unsigned char __fast_bkt[12]
+ = { 2, 2, 2, 4, 8, 8, 8, 8, 16, 16, 16, 16 };
+
+ if (__n <= 11)
+ {
+ _M_next_resize =
+ __builtin_ceil(__fast_bkt[__n] * (long double)_M_max_load_factor);
+ return __fast_bkt[__n];
+ }
+
+ constexpr auto __n_power2
+ = sizeof(__power2_list) / sizeof(unsigned long) - 1;
+ const unsigned long* __next_bkt =
+ std::lower_bound(__power2_list + 4, __power2_list + __n_power2, __n);
+ _M_next_resize =
+ __builtin_ceil(*__next_bkt * (long double)_M_max_load_factor);
+ return *__next_bkt;
+ }
+
+ // Finds the smallest prime p such that alpha p > __n_elt + __n_ins.
+ // If p > __n_bkt, return make_pair(true, p); otherwise return
+ // make_pair(false, 0). In principle this isn't very different from
+ // _M_bkt_for_elements.
+
+ // The only tricky part is that we're caching the element count at
+ // which we need to rehash, so we don't have to do a floating-point
+ // multiply for every insertion.
+
+ std::pair<bool, std::size_t>
+ _Power2_rehash_policy::
+ _M_need_rehash(std::size_t __n_bkt, std::size_t __n_elt,
+ std::size_t __n_ins) const
+ {
+ if (__n_elt + __n_ins >= _M_next_resize)
+ {
+ long double __min_bkts = (__n_elt + __n_ins)
+ / (long double)_M_max_load_factor;
+ if (__min_bkts >= __n_bkt)
+ return std::make_pair(true,
+ _M_next_bkt(std::max<std::size_t>(__builtin_floor(__min_bkts) + 1,
+ __n_bkt * _S_growth_factor)));
+
+ _M_next_resize
+ = __builtin_floor(__n_bkt * (long double)_M_max_load_factor);
+ return std::make_pair(false, 0);
+ }
+ else
+ return std::make_pair(false, 0);
+ }
+
_GLIBCXX_END_NAMESPACE_VERSION
} // namespace __detail
} // namespace std
@@ -127,7 +127,27 @@ template<bool cache>
using __umset = std::__umset_hashtable<Foo, HashFunction,
std::equal_to<Foo>,
std::allocator<Foo>,
- std::__uset_traits<cache>>;
+ std::__umset_traits<cache>>;
+
+template<bool cache>
+ using __uset2 =
+ std::_Hashtable<Foo, Foo, std::allocator<Foo>,
+ std::__detail::_Identity,
+ std::equal_to<Foo>, HashFunction,
+ std::__detail::_Mask_range_hashing,
+ std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash,
+ std::__detail::_Power2_rehash_policy,
+ std::__uset_traits<cache>>;
+
+template<bool cache>
+ using __umset2 =
+ std::_Hashtable<Foo, Foo, std::allocator<Foo>,
+ std::__detail::_Identity,
+ std::equal_to<Foo>, HashFunction,
+ std::__detail::_Mask_range_hashing,
+ std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash,
+ std::__detail::_Power2_rehash_policy,
+ std::__umset_traits<cache>>;
int main()
{
@@ -181,6 +201,19 @@ int main()
stop_counters(time, resource);
report_performance(__FILE__, "std benches", time, resource);
+ start_counters(time, resource);
+ bench<__uset2<false>>(
+ "std::unordered_set2 without hash code cached ", foos);
+ bench<__uset2<true>>(
+ "std::unordered_set2 with hash code cached ", foos);
+ bench<__umset2<false>>(
+ "std::unordered_multiset2 without hash code cached ", foos);
+ bench<__umset2<true>>(
+ "std::unordered_multiset2 with hash code cached ", foos);
+
+ stop_counters(time, resource);
+ report_performance(__FILE__, "std2 benches", time, resource);
+
bench<std::unordered_set<Foo, HashFunction>>(
"std::unordered_set default cache ", foos);
bench<std::unordered_multiset<Foo, HashFunction>>(
@@ -177,6 +177,16 @@ template<bool cache>
cache>;
template<bool cache>
+ using __uset2 =
+ std::_Hashtable<int, int, std::allocator<int>,
+ std::__detail::_Identity,
+ std::equal_to<int>, std::hash<int>,
+ std::__detail::_Mask_range_hashing,
+ std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash,
+ std::__detail::_Power2_rehash_policy,
+ std::__uset_traits<cache>>;
+
+template<bool cache>
using __str_uset =
std::__uset_hashtable<std::string, std::hash<std::string>,
std::equal_to<std::string>,
@@ -190,6 +200,16 @@ template<bool cache>
std::allocator<std::string>,
cache>;
+template<bool cache>
+ using __str_uset2 =
+ std::_Hashtable<std::string, std::string, std::allocator<std::string>,
+ std::__detail::_Identity,
+ std::equal_to<std::string>, std::hash<std::string>,
+ std::__detail::_Mask_range_hashing,
+ std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash,
+ std::__detail::_Power2_rehash_policy,
+ std::__uset_traits<cache>>;
+
int main()
{
bench<__tr1_uset<false>>(
@@ -202,6 +222,10 @@ int main()
"std::unordered_set<int> with hash code cached");
bench<std::unordered_set<int>>(
"std::unordered_set<int> default cache");
+ bench<__uset2<false>>(
+ "std::unordered_set2<int> without hash code cached");
+ bench<__uset2<true>>(
+ "std::unordered_set2<int> with hash code cached");
bench_str<__tr1_str_uset<false>>(
"std::tr1::unordered_set<string> without hash code cached");
bench_str<__tr1_str_uset<true>>(
@@ -210,7 +234,11 @@ int main()
"std::unordered_set<string> without hash code cached");
bench_str<__str_uset<true>>(
"std::unordered_set<string> with hash code cached");
- bench_str<std::unordered_set<std::string>>(
+ bench_str<std::unordered_set<std::string>>(
"std::unordered_set<string> default cache");
+ bench_str<__str_uset2<false>>(
+ "std::unordered_set2<string> without hash code cached");
+ bench_str<__str_uset2<true>>(
+ "std::unordered_set2<string> with hash code cached");
return 0;
}
Hi Here is a patch to offer an alternative hash policy. This one is using power of 2 number of buckets allowing a faster modulo operation. This is obvious when running the performance test that I have adapted to use this alternative policy. Something between current implementation and the tr1 one, the old std one. Of course with this hash policy the lower bits of the hash code are more important. For pointers it would require to change the std::hash implementation to remove the lower 0 bits like in the patch I proposed some weeks ago. What do you think ? François