| Message ID | 1441143203-15044-1-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On 09/02/2015 12:33 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > The current trace prototypes and (matching) trace calls lead to > "unorthodox" PCI BDF notation in at least the stderr trace backend. For > example, the four BARs of a QXL video card at 00:01.0 (bus 0, slot 1, > function 0) are traced like this (PID and timestamps removed): > > pci_update_mappings_add d=0x7f14a73bf890 00:00.1 0,0x84000000+0x4000000 > pci_update_mappings_add d=0x7f14a73bf890 00:00.1 1,0x80000000+0x4000000 > pci_update_mappings_add d=0x7f14a73bf890 00:00.1 2,0x88200000+0x2000 > pci_update_mappings_add d=0x7f14a73bf890 00:00.1 3,0xd060+0x20 > > The slot and function values are in reverse order. > > Stick with the conventional BDF notation. > > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> > Cc: Don Koch <dkoch@verizon.com> > Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org > Fixes: 7828d75045 > Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> > --- > hw/pci/pci.c | 4 ++-- > trace-events | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c > index 9f57aea..47f42ea 100644 > --- a/hw/pci/pci.c > +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c > @@ -1154,16 +1154,16 @@ static void pci_update_mappings(PCIDevice *d) > /* now do the real mapping */ > if (r->addr != PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED) { > trace_pci_update_mappings_del(d, pci_bus_num(d->bus), > - PCI_FUNC(d->devfn), > PCI_SLOT(d->devfn), > + PCI_FUNC(d->devfn), > i, r->addr, r->size); > memory_region_del_subregion(r->address_space, r->memory); > } > r->addr = new_addr; > if (r->addr != PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED) { > trace_pci_update_mappings_add(d, pci_bus_num(d->bus), > - PCI_FUNC(d->devfn), > PCI_SLOT(d->devfn), > + PCI_FUNC(d->devfn), > i, r->addr, r->size); > memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(r->address_space, > r->addr, r->memory, 1); > diff --git a/trace-events b/trace-events > index 8f9614a..5e78f18 100644 > --- a/trace-events > +++ b/trace-events > @@ -1303,8 +1303,8 @@ spapr_pci_lsi_set(const char *busname, int pin, uint32_t irq) "%s PIN%d IRQ %u" > spapr_pci_msi_retry(unsigned config_addr, unsigned req_num, unsigned max_irqs) "Guest device at %x asked %u, have only %u" > > # hw/pci/pci.c > -pci_update_mappings_del(void *d, uint32_t bus, uint32_t func, uint32_t slot, int bar, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size) "d=%p %02x:%02x.%x %d,%#"PRIx64"+%#"PRIx64 > -pci_update_mappings_add(void *d, uint32_t bus, uint32_t func, uint32_t slot, int bar, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size) "d=%p %02x:%02x.%x %d,%#"PRIx64"+%#"PRIx64 > +pci_update_mappings_del(void *d, uint32_t bus, uint32_t slot, uint32_t func, int bar, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size) "d=%p %02x:%02x.%x %d,%#"PRIx64"+%#"PRIx64 > +pci_update_mappings_add(void *d, uint32_t bus, uint32_t slot, uint32_t func, int bar, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size) "d=%p %02x:%02x.%x %d,%#"PRIx64"+%#"PRIx64 > > # hw/net/pcnet.c > pcnet_s_reset(void *s) "s=%p" > Reviewed-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com> Thanks, Marcel
02.09.2015 00:33, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Stick with the conventional BDF notation.
Applied to -trivial, thanks!
/mjt
diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c index 9f57aea..47f42ea 100644 --- a/hw/pci/pci.c +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c @@ -1154,16 +1154,16 @@ static void pci_update_mappings(PCIDevice *d) /* now do the real mapping */ if (r->addr != PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED) { trace_pci_update_mappings_del(d, pci_bus_num(d->bus), - PCI_FUNC(d->devfn), PCI_SLOT(d->devfn), + PCI_FUNC(d->devfn), i, r->addr, r->size); memory_region_del_subregion(r->address_space, r->memory); } r->addr = new_addr; if (r->addr != PCI_BAR_UNMAPPED) { trace_pci_update_mappings_add(d, pci_bus_num(d->bus), - PCI_FUNC(d->devfn), PCI_SLOT(d->devfn), + PCI_FUNC(d->devfn), i, r->addr, r->size); memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(r->address_space, r->addr, r->memory, 1); diff --git a/trace-events b/trace-events index 8f9614a..5e78f18 100644 --- a/trace-events +++ b/trace-events @@ -1303,8 +1303,8 @@ spapr_pci_lsi_set(const char *busname, int pin, uint32_t irq) "%s PIN%d IRQ %u" spapr_pci_msi_retry(unsigned config_addr, unsigned req_num, unsigned max_irqs) "Guest device at %x asked %u, have only %u" # hw/pci/pci.c -pci_update_mappings_del(void *d, uint32_t bus, uint32_t func, uint32_t slot, int bar, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size) "d=%p %02x:%02x.%x %d,%#"PRIx64"+%#"PRIx64 -pci_update_mappings_add(void *d, uint32_t bus, uint32_t func, uint32_t slot, int bar, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size) "d=%p %02x:%02x.%x %d,%#"PRIx64"+%#"PRIx64 +pci_update_mappings_del(void *d, uint32_t bus, uint32_t slot, uint32_t func, int bar, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size) "d=%p %02x:%02x.%x %d,%#"PRIx64"+%#"PRIx64 +pci_update_mappings_add(void *d, uint32_t bus, uint32_t slot, uint32_t func, int bar, uint64_t addr, uint64_t size) "d=%p %02x:%02x.%x %d,%#"PRIx64"+%#"PRIx64 # hw/net/pcnet.c pcnet_s_reset(void *s) "s=%p"
The current trace prototypes and (matching) trace calls lead to "unorthodox" PCI BDF notation in at least the stderr trace backend. For example, the four BARs of a QXL video card at 00:01.0 (bus 0, slot 1, function 0) are traced like this (PID and timestamps removed): pci_update_mappings_add d=0x7f14a73bf890 00:00.1 0,0x84000000+0x4000000 pci_update_mappings_add d=0x7f14a73bf890 00:00.1 1,0x80000000+0x4000000 pci_update_mappings_add d=0x7f14a73bf890 00:00.1 2,0x88200000+0x2000 pci_update_mappings_add d=0x7f14a73bf890 00:00.1 3,0xd060+0x20 The slot and function values are in reverse order. Stick with the conventional BDF notation. Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Don Koch <dkoch@verizon.com> Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org Fixes: 7828d75045 Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> --- hw/pci/pci.c | 4 ++-- trace-events | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)