diff mbox

cxl: Fix ambiguous else warnings

Message ID 1438324508-30341-1-git-send-email-dja@axtens.net (mailing list archive)
State Rejected
Headers show

Commit Message

Daniel Axtens July 31, 2015, 6:35 a.m. UTC
Every time I build cxl I see the following warnings:

/scratch/dja/linux-capi/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c: In function ‘sanitise_afu_regs’:
/scratch/dja/linux-capi/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c:712:6: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous ‘else’ [-Wparentheses]
   if (reg & CXL_PSL_DSISR_TRANS)
      ^
/scratch/dja/linux-capi/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c: In function ‘fail_psl_irq’:
/scratch/dja/linux-capi/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c:184:5: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous ‘else’ [-Wparentheses]
  if (irq_info->dsisr & CXL_PSL_DSISR_TRANS)
     ^

They're annoying. Fix them by inserting the braces.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
---
 drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c | 5 +++--
 drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c | 5 +++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Thomas Huth July 31, 2015, 9:28 a.m. UTC | #1
On 31/07/15 08:35, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Every time I build cxl I see the following warnings:
> 
> /scratch/dja/linux-capi/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c: In function ‘sanitise_afu_regs’:
> /scratch/dja/linux-capi/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c:712:6: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous ‘else’ [-Wparentheses]
>    if (reg & CXL_PSL_DSISR_TRANS)
>       ^
> /scratch/dja/linux-capi/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c: In function ‘fail_psl_irq’:
> /scratch/dja/linux-capi/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c:184:5: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous ‘else’ [-Wparentheses]
>   if (irq_info->dsisr & CXL_PSL_DSISR_TRANS)
>      ^
> 
> They're annoying. Fix them by inserting the braces.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c | 5 +++--
>  drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c | 5 +++--
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c
> index 121ec48f3ab4..c11e583a15a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c
> @@ -181,10 +181,11 @@ static irqreturn_t cxl_irq(int irq, void *data, struct cxl_irq_info *irq_info)
>  
>  static irqreturn_t fail_psl_irq(struct cxl_afu *afu, struct cxl_irq_info *irq_info)
>  {
> -	if (irq_info->dsisr & CXL_PSL_DSISR_TRANS)
> +	if (irq_info->dsisr & CXL_PSL_DSISR_TRANS) {
>  		cxl_p2n_write(afu, CXL_PSL_TFC_An, CXL_PSL_TFC_An_AE);
> -	else
> +	} else {
>  		cxl_p2n_write(afu, CXL_PSL_TFC_An, CXL_PSL_TFC_An_A);
> +	}
>  
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }

Why does your GCC complain here at all? The code doesn't look ambiguous
to me... Which version of GCC are you using?
I just did a quick test compile here, and these warnings do not occur
for me.

 Thomas
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c
index 121ec48f3ab4..c11e583a15a9 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/irq.c
@@ -181,10 +181,11 @@  static irqreturn_t cxl_irq(int irq, void *data, struct cxl_irq_info *irq_info)
 
 static irqreturn_t fail_psl_irq(struct cxl_afu *afu, struct cxl_irq_info *irq_info)
 {
-	if (irq_info->dsisr & CXL_PSL_DSISR_TRANS)
+	if (irq_info->dsisr & CXL_PSL_DSISR_TRANS) {
 		cxl_p2n_write(afu, CXL_PSL_TFC_An, CXL_PSL_TFC_An_AE);
-	else
+	} else {
 		cxl_p2n_write(afu, CXL_PSL_TFC_An, CXL_PSL_TFC_An_A);
+	}
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
index 6d2e538331b6..29c7e4eb309a 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
@@ -709,10 +709,11 @@  static int sanitise_afu_regs(struct cxl_afu *afu)
 	reg = cxl_p2n_read(afu, CXL_PSL_DSISR_An);
 	if (reg) {
 		dev_warn(&afu->dev, "AFU had pending DSISR: %#.16llx\n", reg);
-		if (reg & CXL_PSL_DSISR_TRANS)
+		if (reg & CXL_PSL_DSISR_TRANS) {
 			cxl_p2n_write(afu, CXL_PSL_TFC_An, CXL_PSL_TFC_An_AE);
-		else
+		} else {
 			cxl_p2n_write(afu, CXL_PSL_TFC_An, CXL_PSL_TFC_An_A);
+		}
 	}
 	reg = cxl_p1n_read(afu, CXL_PSL_SERR_An);
 	if (reg) {