diff mbox

[net-next] dev: Spelling fix in comments

Message ID 22a65bcbc60d78e3b953b79b6f30d319.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan July 24, 2015, 3:03 a.m. UTC 
Fix the following typo
- unchainged -> unchanged

Signed-off-by: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@codeaurora.org>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux
Foundation Collaborative Project

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

David Miller July 27, 2015, 7:55 a.m. UTC | #1 
From: subashab@codeaurora.org
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:03:29 -0000

> Fix the following typo
> - unchainged -> unchanged
> 
> Signed-off-by: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@codeaurora.org>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 488ba6c..44d1384 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4986,7 +4986,7 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_all_upper_get_next_dev_rcu);
  * Gets the next netdev_adjacent->private from the dev's lower neighbour
  * list, starting from iter position. The caller must hold either hold the
  * RTNL lock or its own locking that guarantees that the neighbour lower
- * list will remain unchainged.
+ * list will remain unchanged.
  */
 void *netdev_lower_get_next_private(struct net_device *dev,
 				    struct list_head **iter)
@@ -5041,7 +5041,7 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(netdev_lower_get_next_private_rcu);
  * Gets the next netdev_adjacent from the dev's lower neighbour
  * list, starting from iter position. The caller must hold RTNL lock or
  * its own locking that guarantees that the neighbour lower
- * list will remain unchainged.
+ * list will remain unchanged.
  */
 void *netdev_lower_get_next(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head **iter)
 {