| Message ID | 1435676108-20590-3-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com |
|---|---|
| State | Awaiting Upstream |
| Headers | show |
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 04:55:00PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > This is needed by platform-independent code that needs to do something > with devices based on the data provided by the firmware. > > Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Dunno the status of this series, but the i2c change is trivial enough. So in case, the rest is accepted: Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
On 31 July 2015 at 12:36, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 04:55:00PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> This is needed by platform-independent code that needs to do something >> with devices based on the data provided by the firmware. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> > > Dunno the status of this series, but the i2c change is trivial enough. > So in case, the rest is accepted: > > Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Currently my series is moving away from fwnode because the current approach is very much dependent on the firmware, but I think this fix is worth in its own because someone else will find this problem sooner or later. Regards, Tomeu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:17:28PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On 31 July 2015 at 12:36, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 04:55:00PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> This is needed by platform-independent code that needs to do something > >> with devices based on the data provided by the firmware. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> > > > > Dunno the status of this series, but the i2c change is trivial enough. > > So in case, the rest is accepted: > > > > Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> > > Currently my series is moving away from fwnode because the current > approach is very much dependent on the firmware, but I think this fix > is worth in its own because someone else will find this problem sooner > or later. If you think it is a bugfix, then please resend this individually. If not, we will just wait until someone needs it.
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c index 069a41f..707850a 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c @@ -1295,6 +1295,7 @@ static struct i2c_client *of_i2c_register_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap, } info.of_node = of_node_get(node); + info.fwnode = info.of_node ? &info.of_node->fwnode : NULL; info.archdata = &dev_ad; if (of_get_property(node, "wakeup-source", NULL))
This is needed by platform-independent code that needs to do something with devices based on the data provided by the firmware. Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> --- drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)