diff mbox

[3.16.y-ckt,60/71] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer

Message ID 1435226570-3669-61-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Luis Henriques June 25, 2015, 10:02 a.m. UTC 
3.16.7-ckt14 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>

commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream.

The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
so correct it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com

Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
index 0434ff1b808e..5c98a5a67314 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@  static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void)
 
 	if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
 		struct sched_param param = {
-			.sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+			.sched_priority = producer_fifo
 		};
 		sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
 	} else