Patchwork [1/3] #6823 page reading with mandatory locking style

login
register
mail settings
Submitter piastry@etersoft.ru
Date March 28, 2010, 6:33 p.m.
Message ID <201003282233.36549.piastry@etersoft.ru>
Download mbox | patch
Permalink /patch/48786/
State New
Headers show

Comments

piastry@etersoft.ru - March 28, 2010, 6:33 p.m.
В сообщении от 27 марта 2010 04:57:28 вы написали:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:55:31 +0300
> 
> piastry@etersoft.ru wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > index 5183bc2..2b894bd 100644
> > --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
> > @@ -616,6 +616,51 @@ cifs_get_sb(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
> > 
> >  	return 0;
> >  
> >  }
> > 
> > +static ssize_t cifs_sync_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf,
> > +				size_t len, loff_t *ppos)
> > +{
> > +	int retval, read, posix_locking = 0;
> > +	struct file_lock pfLock;
> > +	struct cifsInodeInfo *cifsInode;
> > +	struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb;
> > +	struct cifsTconInfo *tcon;
> > +
> > +	cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(filp->f_path.dentry->d_sb);
> > +	tcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
> > +	if ((tcon->ses->capabilities & CAP_UNIX) &&
> > +	    (CIFS_UNIX_FCNTL_CAP & le64_to_cpu(tcon->fsUnixInfo.Capability)) &&
> > +	    ((cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NOPOSIXBRL) == 0))
> > +		posix_locking = 1;
> > +
> > +	retval = cifs_revalidate(filp->f_path.dentry);
> > +	if (retval < 0)
> > +		return (ssize_t)retval;
> > +
> > +	memset(&pfLock, 0, sizeof(pfLock));
> > +	pfLock.fl_type = F_RDLCK;
> > +	pfLock.fl_start = *ppos;
> > +	pfLock.fl_end = *ppos+len;
> > +	cifsInode = CIFS_I(filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
> > +	if (cifsInode == NULL)
> > +		return -ENOENT;
> > +
> > +	if (!CIFS_I(filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode)->clientCanCacheRead &&
> > +							!posix_locking) {
> > +		retval = cifs_lock(filp, F_GETLK, &pfLock);
> > +		if (retval < 0)
> > +			return (ssize_t)retval;
> > +		if (pfLock.fl_type == F_UNLCK)
> > +			read = do_sync_read(filp, buf, len, ppos);
> > +		else
> > +			return -EACCES;
> > +	} else
> > +		read = do_sync_read(filp, buf, len, ppos);
> > +
> > +	if (read == -EACCES && !posix_locking)
> > +		read = cifs_user_read(filp, buf, len, ppos);
> > +	return read;
> > +}
> > +
> > 
> >  static ssize_t cifs_file_aio_write(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct
> >  iovec *iov,
> >  
> >  				   unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos)
> >  
> >  {
> > 
> > @@ -737,7 +782,7 @@ const struct inode_operations cifs_symlink_inode_ops
> > = {
> > 
> >  };
> >  
> >  const struct file_operations cifs_file_ops = {
> > 
> > -	.read = do_sync_read,
> > +	.read = cifs_sync_read,
> > 
> >  	.write = do_sync_write,
> >  	.aio_read = generic_file_aio_read,
> >  	.aio_write = cifs_file_aio_write,
> >  
> >  Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
> 
> I have no clue what this patch is intended to do. Can you possibly
> explain it, preferably in a resent patch with proper patch descripion
> and signed-off-by line at the beginning?

[CIFS] Fix page reading error with mandatory locking style

If we lock file from one process from 1 to 2 and then try to read it
from another from 0 to 1 without direct mount options, reading fails.
That's why vfs tries to read whole page and fails due the lock from
the first process.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>

See patch in attachment.

--
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky.

Patch

From 2e74c7d08b8f6e07a9ed0d76a4d6771eb0e63a4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:12:59 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] [CIFS] Fix page reading error with mandatory locking style

If we lock file from one process from 1 to 2 and then try to read it
from another from 0 to 1 without direct mount options, reading fails.
That's why vfs tries to read whole page and fails due the lock from
the first process.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
---
 fs/cifs/cifsfs.c |   47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
index ded66be..79c6d0c 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
@@ -616,6 +616,51 @@  cifs_get_sb(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static ssize_t cifs_sync_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf,
+				size_t len, loff_t *ppos)
+{
+	int retval, read, posix_locking = 0;
+	struct file_lock pfLock;
+	struct cifsInodeInfo *cifsInode;
+	struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb;
+	struct cifsTconInfo *tcon;
+
+	cifs_sb = CIFS_SB(filp->f_path.dentry->d_sb);
+	tcon = cifs_sb->tcon;
+	if ((tcon->ses->capabilities & CAP_UNIX) &&
+	    (CIFS_UNIX_FCNTL_CAP & le64_to_cpu(tcon->fsUnixInfo.Capability)) &&
+	    ((cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NOPOSIXBRL) == 0))
+		posix_locking = 1;
+
+	retval = cifs_revalidate(filp->f_path.dentry);
+	if (retval < 0)
+		return (ssize_t)retval;
+
+	memset(&pfLock, 0, sizeof(pfLock));
+	pfLock.fl_type = F_RDLCK;
+	pfLock.fl_start = *ppos;
+	pfLock.fl_end = *ppos+len;
+	cifsInode = CIFS_I(filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
+	if (cifsInode == NULL)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	if (!CIFS_I(filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode)->clientCanCacheRead &&
+							!posix_locking) {
+		retval = cifs_lock(filp, F_GETLK, &pfLock);
+		if (retval < 0)
+			return (ssize_t)retval;
+		if (pfLock.fl_type == F_UNLCK)
+			read = do_sync_read(filp, buf, len, ppos);
+		else
+			return -EACCES;
+	} else
+		read = do_sync_read(filp, buf, len, ppos);
+
+	if (read == -EACCES && !posix_locking)
+		read = cifs_user_read(filp, buf, len, ppos);
+	return read;
+}
+
 static ssize_t cifs_file_aio_write(struct kiocb *iocb, const struct iovec *iov,
 				   unsigned long nr_segs, loff_t pos)
 {
@@ -737,7 +782,7 @@  const struct inode_operations cifs_symlink_inode_ops = {
 };
 
 const struct file_operations cifs_file_ops = {
-	.read = do_sync_read,
+	.read = cifs_sync_read,
 	.write = do_sync_write,
 	.aio_read = generic_file_aio_read,
 	.aio_write = cifs_file_aio_write,
-- 
1.6.6.1