diff mbox

[PATCH/RFC] s390x/ipl: Fix boot if no bootindex was specified

Message ID 1434642868-18685-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Christian Borntraeger June 18, 2015, 3:54 p.m. UTC
commit fa92e218df1d ("s390x/ipl: avoid sign extension") introduced
a regression:

qemu-system-s390x -drive file=/home/cborntra/image.zhyp409,format=qcow2
does not boot, the bios states
"No virtio-blk device found!"

adding bootindex=1 does boot.

The reason is that the uint32_t as return value will not do the right
thing for the return -1 (default without bootindex).
The bios itself, will interpret a 64bit -1 as autodetect (but it will
interpret 32bit -1 as ccw device address ff.ff.ffff)

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org # v2.3.0
---
 hw/s390x/ipl.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Aurelien Jarno June 18, 2015, 5:26 p.m. UTC | #1
On 2015-06-18 17:54, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> commit fa92e218df1d ("s390x/ipl: avoid sign extension") introduced
> a regression:
> 
> qemu-system-s390x -drive file=/home/cborntra/image.zhyp409,format=qcow2
> does not boot, the bios states
> "No virtio-blk device found!"
> 
> adding bootindex=1 does boot.
> 
> The reason is that the uint32_t as return value will not do the right
> thing for the return -1 (default without bootindex).
> The bios itself, will interpret a 64bit -1 as autodetect (but it will
> interpret 32bit -1 as ccw device address ff.ff.ffff)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org # v2.3.0
> ---
>  hw/s390x/ipl.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Thanks for the quick patch, I confirmed it works.

Tested-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Reviewed-by: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Cornelia Huck June 30, 2015, 7:50 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:54:28 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:

> commit fa92e218df1d ("s390x/ipl: avoid sign extension") introduced
> a regression:
> 
> qemu-system-s390x -drive file=/home/cborntra/image.zhyp409,format=qcow2
> does not boot, the bios states
> "No virtio-blk device found!"
> 
> adding bootindex=1 does boot.
> 
> The reason is that the uint32_t as return value will not do the right
> thing for the return -1 (default without bootindex).
> The bios itself, will interpret a 64bit -1 as autodetect (but it will
> interpret 32bit -1 as ccw device address ff.ff.ffff)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org # v2.3.0
> ---
>  hw/s390x/ipl.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Applied to my s390-next branch.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/hw/s390x/ipl.c b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
index 132004a..2e0a8b6 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/ipl.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/ipl.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@  static Property s390_ipl_properties[] = {
  * - -1 if no valid boot device was found
  * - ccw id of the boot device otherwise
  */
-static uint32_t s390_update_iplstate(CPUS390XState *env, S390IPLState *ipl)
+static uint64_t s390_update_iplstate(CPUS390XState *env, S390IPLState *ipl)
 {
     DeviceState *dev_st;
 
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@  static uint32_t s390_update_iplstate(CPUS390XState *env, S390IPLState *ipl)
 
     return -1;
 out:
-    return ipl->cssid << 24 | ipl->ssid << 16 | ipl->devno;
+    return (uint32_t) (ipl->cssid << 24 | ipl->ssid << 16 | ipl->devno);
 }
 
 int s390_ipl_update_diag308(IplParameterBlock *iplb)