From patchwork Sun Mar 7 01:17:49 2010 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: JFFS2 FAQ - Spelling Error Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:17:49 -0000 From: Brian X-Patchwork-Id: 47064 Message-Id: <829395.51053.qm@web83905.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org I'm sorry, apparently it doesn't accept the attachment properly. Here's a quick spelling fix. >From daa6039bd96dec5ac191b4067cd1e46420a907d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:12:40 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Spelling error of "write-through cache" in jffs2 FAQ --- faq/jffs2.xml | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/faq/jffs2.xml b/faq/jffs2.xml index 0e58398..f94efa1 100644 --- a/faq/jffs2.xml +++ b/faq/jffs2.xml @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ Owing to peculiarities of flash devices, JFFS2 is very different to conventional HDD-oriented file system. And one of its drawbacks is that mount time as well as memory consumption grow linearly with growing flash size. So beware you may end up with tremendous amount memory eaten and huge mount time if -your block device is very large. Also, JFFS2 implements only write-trough +your block device is very large. Also, JFFS2 implements only write-through caching (while convectional FS-es have write-back) and does many thing which are not really needed in case of hard drives.