diff mbox

boot/uboot: add hash for 2012.07

Message ID 1430078172-8136-1-git-send-email-vincent.stehle@laposte.net
State Rejected
Headers show

Commit Message

Vincent Stehlé April 26, 2015, 7:56 p.m. UTC
From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>

To repair the build of pandaboard_defconfig.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
---
 boot/uboot/uboot.hash | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Thomas Petazzoni April 26, 2015, 8:27 p.m. UTC | #1
Vincent, Yann,

On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 21:56:12 +0200, Vincent Stehle wrote:
> From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
> 
> To repair the build of pandaboard_defconfig.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
> ---
>  boot/uboot/uboot.hash | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/boot/uboot/uboot.hash b/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
> index 9cc96f6..9def045 100644
> --- a/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
> +++ b/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
>  # Locally computed:
> +sha256	e08e20a6979bfca6eebb9a2b0e42aa4416af3d796332fd63a3470495a089d496  u-boot-2012.07.tar.bz2
>  sha256	0a1a70df586655f527befa6f12e184e96ed61b126e5a567382321b17200f5d60  u-boot-2015.04.tar.bz2

The problem indeed exists, but this is not the right solution. The
right solution is to use BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR. Yann, can you look at
all the packages that may use custom versions (U-Boot, Barebox,
kernel, etc.) and do the necessary BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR handling?

Thanks a lot!

Thomas
Yann E. MORIN April 26, 2015, 9:33 p.m. UTC | #2
Thomas, Vincent, All,

On 2015-04-26 22:27 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 21:56:12 +0200, Vincent Stehle wrote:
> > From: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
> > 
> > To repair the build of pandaboard_defconfig.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@laposte.net>
> > ---
> >  boot/uboot/uboot.hash | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/boot/uboot/uboot.hash b/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
> > index 9cc96f6..9def045 100644
> > --- a/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
> > +++ b/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
> > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
> >  # Locally computed:
> > +sha256	e08e20a6979bfca6eebb9a2b0e42aa4416af3d796332fd63a3470495a089d496  u-boot-2012.07.tar.bz2
> >  sha256	0a1a70df586655f527befa6f12e184e96ed61b126e5a567382321b17200f5d60  u-boot-2015.04.tar.bz2
> 
> The problem indeed exists, but this is not the right solution. The
> right solution is to use BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR. Yann, can you look at
> all the packages that may use custom versions (U-Boot, Barebox,
> kernel, etc.) and do the necessary BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR handling?

I'll have a look.

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Thomas Petazzoni April 28, 2015, 8:03 a.m. UTC | #3
Dear Yann E. MORIN,

On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 23:33:41 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:

> > The problem indeed exists, but this is not the right solution. The
> > right solution is to use BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR. Yann, can you look at
> > all the packages that may use custom versions (U-Boot, Barebox,
> > kernel, etc.) and do the necessary BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR handling?
> 
> I'll have a look.

Any updates on this? One quick option I see is to remove uboot.hash for
now.

Thomas
Yann E. MORIN April 28, 2015, 9:52 a.m. UTC | #4
On April 28, 2015 10:03:57 AM GMT+02:00, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>Dear Yann E. MORIN,
>
>On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 23:33:41 +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
>
>> > The problem indeed exists, but this is not the right solution. The
>> > right solution is to use BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR. Yann, can you look
>at
>> > all the packages that may use custom versions (U-Boot, Barebox,
>> > kernel, etc.) and do the necessary BR_NO_CHECK_HASH_FOR handling?
>> 
>> I'll have a look.
>
>Any updates on this? One quick option I see is to remove uboot.hash for
>now.
>
>Thomas
>-- 
>Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
>Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
>http://free-electrons.com

Thomas, all,

Just a quick answer: yes, I have changes for a bunch of packages
that I'll submit this evening when back home.

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Thomas Petazzoni April 28, 2015, 2:58 p.m. UTC | #5
Hello,


> >Any updates on this? One quick option I see is to remove uboot.hash for
> >now.

> Just a quick answer: yes, I have changes for a bunch of packages
> that I'll submit this evening when back home.

Great, thanks!

Thomas
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/boot/uboot/uboot.hash b/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
index 9cc96f6..9def045 100644
--- a/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
+++ b/boot/uboot/uboot.hash
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ 
 # Locally computed:
+sha256	e08e20a6979bfca6eebb9a2b0e42aa4416af3d796332fd63a3470495a089d496  u-boot-2012.07.tar.bz2
 sha256	0a1a70df586655f527befa6f12e184e96ed61b126e5a567382321b17200f5d60  u-boot-2015.04.tar.bz2