| Message ID | 20150402083534.GT25731@redhat.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 10:35:35AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote: > We are now more strict when accepting user-defined initializer_lists; in > particular, we now require sizetype, not just any integral type. The > following test failed with -m32, because it had a bogus type of size_t, > with -m32 it usually should be unsigned int, not unsigned long. > > Test passes now with both -m32/-m64, ok for trunk? That is obvious. > 2015-04-02 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com> > > * g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C: Use proper type for size_t. > > diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C > index 94b576f..c0fc966 100644 > --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C > +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > // { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } > // { dg-options "-fcompare-debug" } > > -typedef long unsigned size_t; > +typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t; > namespace > { > template < typename _Tp, _Tp __v > struct integral_constant Jakub
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C index 94b576f..c0fc966 100644 --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/pr57101.C @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ // { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } // { dg-options "-fcompare-debug" } -typedef long unsigned size_t; +typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t; namespace { template < typename _Tp, _Tp __v > struct integral_constant