diff mbox

xfrm: Flushing empty SPD generates false events

Message ID 1265885593.3988.6.camel@bigi
State Accepted, archived
Delegated to: David Miller
Headers show

Commit Message

jamal Feb. 11, 2010, 10:53 a.m. UTC 
Observed similar behavior on SPD as previouly seen on SAD flushing..
This fixes it.

cheers,
jamal
commit 428b20432dc31bc2e01a94cd451cf5a2c00d2bf4
Author: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Date:   Thu Feb 11 05:49:38 2010 -0500

    xfrm: Flushing empty SPD generates false events
    
    To see the effect make sure you have an empty SPD.
    On window1 "ip xfrm mon" and on window2 issue "ip xfrm policy flush"
    You get prompt back in window1 and you see the flush event on window2.
    With this fix, you still get prompt on window1 but no event on window2.
    
    Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>

Comments

David Miller Feb. 16, 2010, 5:54 a.m. UTC | #1 
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:53:13 -0500

>     xfrm: Flushing empty SPD generates false events
>     
>     To see the effect make sure you have an empty SPD.
>     On window1 "ip xfrm mon" and on window2 issue "ip xfrm policy flush"
>     You get prompt back in window1 and you see the flush event on window2.
>     With this fix, you still get prompt on window1 but no event on window2.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>

Applied to net-next-2.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/net/key/af_key.c b/net/key/af_key.c
index 0f53e60..978f78b 100644
--- a/net/key/af_key.c
+++ b/net/key/af_key.c
@@ -2713,7 +2713,7 @@  static int pfkey_spdflush(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, struct sadb_msg
 	audit_info.secid = 0;
 	err = xfrm_policy_flush(net, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN, &audit_info);
 	if (err)
-		return err;
+		return 0;
 	c.data.type = XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN;
 	c.event = XFRM_MSG_FLUSHPOLICY;
 	c.pid = hdr->sadb_msg_pid;
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 0ecb16a..eb870fc 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -771,7 +771,8 @@  xfrm_policy_flush_secctx_check(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audi
 
 int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
 {
-	int dir, err = 0;
+	int dir, err = 0, cnt = 0;
+	struct xfrm_policy *dp;
 
 	write_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
 
@@ -789,8 +790,10 @@  int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
 				     &net->xfrm.policy_inexact[dir], bydst) {
 			if (pol->type != type)
 				continue;
-			__xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
+			dp = __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
 			write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
+			if (dp)
+				cnt++;
 
 			xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1, audit_info->loginuid,
 						 audit_info->sessionid,
@@ -809,8 +812,10 @@  int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
 					     bydst) {
 				if (pol->type != type)
 					continue;
-				__xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
+				dp = __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
 				write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
+				if (dp)
+					cnt++;
 
 				xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1,
 							 audit_info->loginuid,
@@ -824,6 +829,8 @@  int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
 		}
 
 	}
+	if (!cnt)
+		err = -ESRCH;
 	atomic_inc(&flow_cache_genid);
 out:
 	write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index 7c87004..b0fb7d3 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@  static int xfrm_flush_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 	audit_info.secid = NETLINK_CB(skb).sid;
 	err = xfrm_policy_flush(net, type, &audit_info);
 	if (err)
-		return err;
+		return 0;
 	c.data.type = type;
 	c.event = nlh->nlmsg_type;
 	c.seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;