diff mbox

[2/6] i2c: qup: Add V2 tags support

Message ID 1426268992-19298-3-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org
State Superseded
Headers show

Commit Message

Sricharan Ramabadhran March 13, 2015, 5:49 p.m. UTC
From: Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>

QUP from version 2.1.1 onwards, supports a new format of
i2c command tags. Tag codes instructs the controller to
perform a operation like read/write. This new tagging version
supports bam dma and transfers of more than 256 bytes without 'stop'
in between. Adding the support for the same.

For each block a data_write/read tag and data_len tag is added to
the output fifo. For the final block of data write_stop/read_stop
tag is used.

Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c | 342 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 305 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

Comments

Ivan T. Ivanov March 25, 2015, 12:24 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Sricharan,

On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 23:19 +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> From: Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>
> 
> QUP from version 2.1.1 onwards, supports a new format of
> i2c command tags. Tag codes instructs the controller to
> perform a operation like read/write. This new tagging version
> supports bam dma and transfers of more than 256 bytes without 'stop'
> in between. Adding the support for the same.
> 
> For each block a data_write/read tag and data_len tag is added to
> the output fifo. For the final block of data write_stop/read_stop
> tag is used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c | 342 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 

<snip>

> +#define I2C_QUP_CLK_MAX_FREQ           3400000

unused?

> +
>  /* Status, Error flags */
>  #define I2C_STATUS_WR_BUFFER_FULL      BIT(0)
>  #define I2C_STATUS_BUS_ACTIVE          BIT(8)
> @@ -99,6 +117,11 @@
> 
>  #define QUP_READ_LIMIT                 256
> 
> +struct qup_i2c_config {
> +       int tag_ver;
> +       int max_freq;
> +};
> +

Do you really need this one. It is referenced only during probe, 
but information contained in is already available by other means.


>  struct qup_i2c_dev {
>         struct device*dev;
>         void __iomem*base;
> @@ -112,9 +135,20 @@ struct qup_i2c_dev {
>         int     in_fifo_sz;
>         int     out_blk_sz;
>         int     in_blk_sz;
> -
> +       int     blocks;
> +       u8      *block_tag_len;
> +       int     *block_data_len;

Maybe these could be organized in struct?

<snip>

> 
> +static void qup_i2c_create_tag_v2(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup,
> +                                               struct i2c_msg *msg)
> +{
> +       u16 addr = (msg->addr << 1) | ((msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) == I2C_M_RD);
> +       int len = 0, prev_len = 0;
> +       int blocks = 0;
> +       int rem;
> +       int block_len = 0;
> +       int data_len;
> +
> +       qup->block_pos = 0;
> +       qup->pos = 0;
> +       qup->blocks = (msg->len + QUP_READ_LIMIT - 1) / (QUP_READ_LIMIT);

Braces around QUP_READ_LIMIT are not needed.

> +       rem = msg->len % QUP_READ_LIMIT;
> +
> +       /* 2 tag bytes for each block + 2 extra bytes for first block */
> +       qup->tags = kzalloc((qup->blocks << 1) + 2, GFP_KERNEL);

Don't play tricks with shifts, just use multiplication.

> +       qup->block_tag_len = kzalloc(qup->blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
> +       qup->block_data_len = kzalloc(sizeof(int) * qup->blocks, GFP_KERNEL);

Better use sizeof(*qup->block_data_len).

> +
> +       while (blocks < qup->blocks) {
> +               /* 0 is used to specify a READ_LIMIT of 256 bytes */
> +               data_len = (blocks < (qup->blocks - 1)) ? 0 : rem;
> +
> +               /* Send START and ADDR bytes only for the first block */
> +               if (!blocks) {
> +                       qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_START;
> +
> +                       if (qup->is_hs) {
> +                               qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_HS;
> +                               qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_START;

Is this second QUP_TAG_V2_START intentional?

> +                       }
> +
> +                       qup->tags[len++] = addr & 0xff;
> +                       if (msg->flags & I2C_M_TEN)
> +                               qup->tags[len++] = addr >> 8;
> +               }
> +
> +               /* Send _STOP commands for the last block */
> +               if (blocks == (qup->blocks - 1)) {
> +                       if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
> +                               qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD_STOP;
> +                       else
> +                               qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATAWR_STOP;
> +               } else {
> +                       if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
> +                               qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD;
> +                       else
> +                               qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATAWR;
> +               }
> +
> +               qup->tags[len++] = data_len;
> +               block_len = len - prev_len;
> +               prev_len = len;
> +               qup->block_tag_len[blocks] = block_len;
> +
> +               if (!data_len)
> +                       qup->block_data_len[blocks] = QUP_READ_LIMIT;
> +               else
> +                       qup->block_data_len[blocks] = data_len;
> +
> +               qup->tags_pos = 0;
> +               blocks++;
> +       }
> +
> +       qup->tx_tag_len = len;
> +
> +       if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
> +               qup->rx_tag_len = (qup->blocks << 1);

here again.

> +       else
> +               qup->rx_tag_len = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 qup_i2c_xfer_data(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, int len,
> +                                                               u8 *buf, int last)
> +{

I think that xfer is too vague in this case, prefer write or send.

> +       static u32 val, idx;

static? please fix.

> +       u32  t, rem, pos = 0;
> +
> +       rem = len - pos + idx;
> +
> +       while (rem) {
> +               if (qup_i2c_wait_ready(qup, QUP_OUT_FULL, 0, 4)) {
> +                       dev_err(qup->dev, "timeout for fifo out full");
> +                       break;
> +               }
> +
> +               t = (rem >= 4) ? 4 : rem;
> +
> +               while (idx < t)
> +                       val |= buf[pos++] << (idx++ << 3);

here again, multiplication or shift?

> +
> +               if (t == 4) {
> +                       writel(val, qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
> +                       idx = val = 0;
> +               }
> +
> +               rem = len - pos;
> +       }
> +

What will happen if they are less than 4 bytes to send?

> +       if (last) {
> +               writel(val, qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
> +               idx = val = 0;
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> 

<snip>

> 
> -static void qup_i2c_issue_read(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
> +static void qup_i2c_issue_read_v1(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct
> +                                               i2c_msg *msg)

Please, move struct on the same line as i2c_msg.

>  {
>         u32 addr, len, val;
> 
> @@ -395,24 +576,33 @@ static void qup_i2c_issue_read(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
>         /* 0 is used to specify a length 256 (QUP_READ_LIMIT) */
>         len = (msg->len == QUP_READ_LIMIT) ? 0 : msg->len;
> 
> -       val = ((QUP_TAG_REC | len) << QUP_MSW_SHIFT) | QUP_TAG_START | addr;
> +       val = ((QUP_TAG_REC | len) << QUP_MSW_SHIFT) | QUP_TAG_START |
> +                       addr;

Unrelated change?

>         writel(val, qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
>  }
> 
> 

<snip>

> 
> +static void qup_i2c_read_fifo_v2(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct
> +                                       i2c_msg *msg)
> +{
> +       u32 val;
> +       int idx;
> +       int pos = 0;

> +       int total = qup->block_data_len[qup->block_pos] + 2;

Could we  have at least comment what is this +2?

<snip>

> +
> +static void qup_i2c_read_fifo(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg
> +                                                                       *msg)

Bad indent? 

<snip>


> +static const struct qup_i2c_config configs[] = {
> +       { 0, 400000, },
> +       { 1, 3400000, },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id qup_i2c_dt_match[] = {
> +       { .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v1.1.1", .data = &configs[0] },
> +       { .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v2.1.1", .data = &configs[1] },
> +       { .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v2.2.1", .data = &configs[1] },
> +       {}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qup_i2c_dt_match);
> +
>  static void qup_i2c_disable_clocks(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup)
>  {
>         u32 config;
> @@ -579,6 +837,8 @@ static int qup_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         int ret, fs_div, hs_div;
>         int src_clk_freq;
>         u32 clk_freq = 100000;
> +       const struct qup_i2c_config *config;
> +       const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> 
>         qup = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*qup), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!qup)
> @@ -590,8 +850,15 @@ static int qup_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 
>         of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &clk_freq);
> 
> -       /* We support frequencies up to FAST Mode (400KHz) */
> -       if (!clk_freq || clk_freq > 400000) {
> +       of_id = of_match_node(qup_i2c_dt_match, node);
> +       if (!of_id)
> +               return -EINVAL;

this could not happen.

> +
> +       config = of_id->data;
> +       qup->use_v2_tags = !!config->tag_ver;
> +
> +       /* We support frequencies up to HIGH SPEED Mode (3400KHz) */
> +       if (!clk_freq || clk_freq > config->max_freq) {

Looks like if controller is v > 1 it supports I2C_QUP_CLK_MAX_FREQ.
I don't see need for struct qup_i2c_config.

Regards,
Ivan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sricharan Ramabadhran March 26, 2015, 5:44 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Ivan,

On 03/25/2015 05:54 PM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>
> Hi Sricharan,
>
> On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 23:19 +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>> From: Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> QUP from version 2.1.1 onwards, supports a new format of
>> i2c command tags. Tag codes instructs the controller to
>> perform a operation like read/write. This new tagging version
>> supports bam dma and transfers of more than 256 bytes without 'stop'
>> in between. Adding the support for the same.
>>
>> For each block a data_write/read tag and data_len tag is added to
>> the output fifo. For the final block of data write_stop/read_stop
>> tag is used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c | 342 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>> +#define I2C_QUP_CLK_MAX_FREQ           3400000
>
> unused?
>
Ok, will remove this.

>> +
>>   /* Status, Error flags */
>>   #define I2C_STATUS_WR_BUFFER_FULL      BIT(0)
>>   #define I2C_STATUS_BUS_ACTIVE          BIT(8)
>> @@ -99,6 +117,11 @@
>>
>>   #define QUP_READ_LIMIT                 256
>>
>> +struct qup_i2c_config {
>> +       int tag_ver;
>> +       int max_freq;
>> +};
>> +
>
> Do you really need this one. It is referenced only during probe,
> but information contained in is already available by other means.
>
Ok, agree that this can be removed and the information can be fixed
for V1 version and same for the rest of the other versions. That would
need to use compatible check though.
>
>>   struct qup_i2c_dev {
>>          struct device*dev;
>>          void __iomem*base;
>> @@ -112,9 +135,20 @@ struct qup_i2c_dev {
>>          int     in_fifo_sz;
>>          int     out_blk_sz;
>>          int     in_blk_sz;
>> -
>> +       int     blocks;
>> +       u8      *block_tag_len;
>> +       int     *block_data_len;
>
> Maybe these could be organized in struct?
>
ok, will group it.
> <snip>
>
>>
>> +static void qup_i2c_create_tag_v2(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup,
>> +                                               struct i2c_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> +       u16 addr = (msg->addr << 1) | ((msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) == I2C_M_RD);
>> +       int len = 0, prev_len = 0;
>> +       int blocks = 0;
>> +       int rem;
>> +       int block_len = 0;
>> +       int data_len;
>> +
>> +       qup->block_pos = 0;
>> +       qup->pos = 0;
>> +       qup->blocks = (msg->len + QUP_READ_LIMIT - 1) / (QUP_READ_LIMIT);
>
> Braces around QUP_READ_LIMIT are not needed.
>
ok.
>> +       rem = msg->len % QUP_READ_LIMIT;
>> +
>> +       /* 2 tag bytes for each block + 2 extra bytes for first block */
>> +       qup->tags = kzalloc((qup->blocks << 1) + 2, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Don't play tricks with shifts, just use multiplication.
>
why ?
>> +       qup->block_tag_len = kzalloc(qup->blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       qup->block_data_len = kzalloc(sizeof(int) * qup->blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Better use sizeof(*qup->block_data_len).
>
ok.
>> +
>> +       while (blocks < qup->blocks) {
>> +               /* 0 is used to specify a READ_LIMIT of 256 bytes */
>> +               data_len = (blocks < (qup->blocks - 1)) ? 0 : rem;
>> +
>> +               /* Send START and ADDR bytes only for the first block */
>> +               if (!blocks) {
>> +                       qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_START;
>> +
>> +                       if (qup->is_hs) {
>> +                               qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_HS;
>> +                               qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_START;
>
> Is this second QUP_TAG_V2_START intentional?
>
  Yes, for HS mode 2 start tags are required.
>> +                       }
>> +
>> +                       qup->tags[len++] = addr & 0xff;
>> +                       if (msg->flags & I2C_M_TEN)
>> +                               qup->tags[len++] = addr >> 8;
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               /* Send _STOP commands for the last block */
>> +               if (blocks == (qup->blocks - 1)) {
>> +                       if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
>> +                               qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD_STOP;
>> +                       else
>> +                               qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATAWR_STOP;
>> +               } else {
>> +                       if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
>> +                               qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD;
>> +                       else
>> +                               qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATAWR;
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               qup->tags[len++] = data_len;
>> +               block_len = len - prev_len;
>> +               prev_len = len;
>> +               qup->block_tag_len[blocks] = block_len;
>> +
>> +               if (!data_len)
>> +                       qup->block_data_len[blocks] = QUP_READ_LIMIT;
>> +               else
>> +                       qup->block_data_len[blocks] = data_len;
>> +
>> +               qup->tags_pos = 0;
>> +               blocks++;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       qup->tx_tag_len = len;
>> +
>> +       if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
>> +               qup->rx_tag_len = (qup->blocks << 1);
>
> here again.
>
hmm, why not shift ?
>> +       else
>> +               qup->rx_tag_len = 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 qup_i2c_xfer_data(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, int len,
>> +                                                               u8 *buf, int last)
>> +{
>
> I think that xfer is too vague in this case, prefer write or send.
>
ok. Will change it to send.
>> +       static u32 val, idx;
>
> static? please fix.
  That was intentional. Using to pack tag and data in to one word across
  two calls. So preserving val, idx across calls.
>
>> +       u32  t, rem, pos = 0;
>> +
>> +       rem = len - pos + idx;
>> +
>> +       while (rem) {
>> +               if (qup_i2c_wait_ready(qup, QUP_OUT_FULL, 0, 4)) {
>> +                       dev_err(qup->dev, "timeout for fifo out full");
>> +                       break;
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               t = (rem >= 4) ? 4 : rem;
>> +
>> +               while (idx < t)
>> +                       val |= buf[pos++] << (idx++ << 3);
>
> here again, multiplication or shift?
>
  I felt shifts should be readable. No ?
>> +
>> +               if (t == 4) {
>> +                       writel(val, qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
>> +                       idx = val = 0;
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               rem = len - pos;
>> +       }
>> +
>
> What will happen if they are less than 4 bytes to send?
>
It gets written over in the next call and gets written here itself if it 
is the last block of data.
>> +       if (last) {
>> +               writel(val, qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
>> +               idx = val = 0;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>>
>> -static void qup_i2c_issue_read(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
>> +static void qup_i2c_issue_read_v1(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct
>> +                                               i2c_msg *msg)
>
> Please, move struct on the same line as i2c_msg.
>
ok.

>>   {
>>          u32 addr, len, val;
>>
>> @@ -395,24 +576,33 @@ static void qup_i2c_issue_read(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
>>          /* 0 is used to specify a length 256 (QUP_READ_LIMIT) */
>>          len = (msg->len == QUP_READ_LIMIT) ? 0 : msg->len;
>>
>> -       val = ((QUP_TAG_REC | len) << QUP_MSW_SHIFT) | QUP_TAG_START | addr;
>> +       val = ((QUP_TAG_REC | len) << QUP_MSW_SHIFT) | QUP_TAG_START |
>> +                       addr;
>
> Unrelated change?
  hmm. Must have come for adjusting 80 chars. Will remove this here.
>
>>          writel(val, qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
>>   }
>>
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>>
>> +static void qup_i2c_read_fifo_v2(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct
>> +                                       i2c_msg *msg)
>> +{
>> +       u32 val;
>> +       int idx;
>> +       int pos = 0;
>
>> +       int total = qup->block_data_len[qup->block_pos] + 2;
>
> Could we  have at least comment what is this +2?
>
  Ok. The +2 is for the read tags that are extra bytes read for each
  block. Will add comment for that.

> <snip>
>
>> +
>> +static void qup_i2c_read_fifo(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg
>> +                                                                       *msg)
>
> Bad indent?
>
  ok. Will fix it.
> <snip>
>
>
>> +static const struct qup_i2c_config configs[] = {
>> +       { 0, 400000, },
>> +       { 1, 3400000, },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id qup_i2c_dt_match[] = {
>> +       { .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v1.1.1", .data = &configs[0] },
>> +       { .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v2.1.1", .data = &configs[1] },
>> +       { .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v2.2.1", .data = &configs[1] },
>> +       {}
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qup_i2c_dt_match);
>> +
>>   static void qup_i2c_disable_clocks(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup)
>>   {
>>          u32 config;
>> @@ -579,6 +837,8 @@ static int qup_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>          int ret, fs_div, hs_div;
>>          int src_clk_freq;
>>          u32 clk_freq = 100000;
>> +       const struct qup_i2c_config *config;
>> +       const struct of_device_id *of_id;
>>
>>          qup = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*qup), GFP_KERNEL);
>>          if (!qup)
>> @@ -590,8 +850,15 @@ static int qup_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>>          of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &clk_freq);
>>
>> -       /* We support frequencies up to FAST Mode (400KHz) */
>> -       if (!clk_freq || clk_freq > 400000) {
>> +       of_id = of_match_node(qup_i2c_dt_match, node);
>> +       if (!of_id)
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>
> this could not happen.
>
  Correct. Will remove it.
>> +
>> +       config = of_id->data;
>> +       qup->use_v2_tags = !!config->tag_ver;
>> +
>> +       /* We support frequencies up to HIGH SPEED Mode (3400KHz) */
>> +       if (!clk_freq || clk_freq > config->max_freq) {
>
> Looks like if controller is v > 1 it supports I2C_QUP_CLK_MAX_FREQ.
> I don't see need for struct qup_i2c_config.
>
Ok, this can removed if compatible check is used to differentiate 
between V1 and rest of the versions.

Regards,
  Sricharan
Ivan T. Ivanov March 26, 2015, 7:31 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Sricharan,

On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 11:14 +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> 
> > > +       if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
> > > +               qup->rx_tag_len = (qup->blocks << 1);
> > 
> > here again.
> > 
> hmm, why not shift ?

Because it makes reading code harder and because compiler
 is smart enough to choose appropriate instruction for
underling CPU architecture.

> > > +       else
> > > +               qup->rx_tag_len = 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static u32 qup_i2c_xfer_data(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, int len,
> > > +                                                               u8 *buf, int last)
> > > +{
> > 
> > I think that xfer is too vague in this case, prefer write or send.
> > 
> ok. Will change it to send.
> > > +       static u32 val, idx;
> > 
> > static? please fix.
>   That was intentional. Using to pack tag and data in to one word across
>   two calls. So preserving val, idx across calls.

Sorry this is no go! Reorganize the code, please.

Regards,
Ivan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sricharan Ramabadhran March 26, 2015, 8:36 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Ivan,

On 03/26/2015 01:01 PM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> Hi Sricharan,
>
> On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 11:14 +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>>
>>>> +       if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
>>>> +               qup->rx_tag_len = (qup->blocks << 1);
>>>
>>> here again.
>>>
>> hmm, why not shift ?
>
> Because it makes reading code harder and because compiler
>   is smart enough to choose appropriate instruction for
> underling CPU architecture.
>
ok.
>>>> +       else
>>>> +               qup->rx_tag_len = 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static u32 qup_i2c_xfer_data(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, int len,
>>>> +                                                               u8 *buf, int last)
>>>> +{
>>>
>>> I think that xfer is too vague in this case, prefer write or send.
>>>
>> ok. Will change it to send.
>>>> +       static u32 val, idx;
>>>
>>> static? please fix.
>>    That was intentional. Using to pack tag and data in to one word across
>>    two calls. So preserving val, idx across calls.
>
> Sorry this is no go! Reorganize the code, please.
>
Ok, will change this function.

Regards,
  Sricharan
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
index 49c6cba..e4e223f 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
 
 /* QUP Registers */
 #define QUP_CONFIG		0x000
@@ -42,6 +43,7 @@ 
 #define QUP_IN_FIFO_BASE	0x218
 #define QUP_I2C_CLK_CTL		0x400
 #define QUP_I2C_STATUS		0x404
+#define QUP_I2C_MASTER_GEN	0x408
 
 /* QUP States and reset values */
 #define QUP_RESET_STATE		0
@@ -69,6 +71,8 @@ 
 #define QUP_CLOCK_AUTO_GATE	BIT(13)
 #define I2C_MINI_CORE		(2 << 8)
 #define I2C_N_VAL		15
+#define I2C_N_VAL_V2		7
+
 /* Most significant word offset in FIFO port */
 #define QUP_MSW_SHIFT		(I2C_N_VAL + 1)
 
@@ -80,17 +84,31 @@ 
 
 #define QUP_REPACK_EN		(QUP_UNPACK_EN | QUP_PACK_EN)
 
+#define QUP_V2_TAGS_EN		1
+
 #define QUP_OUTPUT_BLOCK_SIZE(x)(((x) >> 0) & 0x03)
 #define QUP_OUTPUT_FIFO_SIZE(x)	(((x) >> 2) & 0x07)
 #define QUP_INPUT_BLOCK_SIZE(x)	(((x) >> 5) & 0x03)
 #define QUP_INPUT_FIFO_SIZE(x)	(((x) >> 7) & 0x07)
 
-/* QUP tags */
+/* QUP V1 tags */
 #define QUP_TAG_START		(1 << 8)
 #define QUP_TAG_DATA		(2 << 8)
 #define QUP_TAG_STOP		(3 << 8)
 #define QUP_TAG_REC		(4 << 8)
 
+/* QUP v2 tags */
+#define QUP_TAG_V2_HS                  0xff
+#define QUP_TAG_V2_START               0x81
+#define QUP_TAG_V2_DATAWR              0x82
+#define QUP_TAG_V2_DATAWR_STOP         0x83
+#define QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD              0x85
+#define QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD_STOP         0x87
+
+/* frequency definitions for high speed and max speed */
+#define I2C_QUP_CLK_FAST_FREQ          1000000
+#define I2C_QUP_CLK_MAX_FREQ           3400000
+
 /* Status, Error flags */
 #define I2C_STATUS_WR_BUFFER_FULL	BIT(0)
 #define I2C_STATUS_BUS_ACTIVE		BIT(8)
@@ -99,6 +117,11 @@ 
 
 #define QUP_READ_LIMIT			256
 
+struct qup_i2c_config {
+	int tag_ver;
+	int max_freq;
+};
+
 struct qup_i2c_dev {
 	struct device		*dev;
 	void __iomem		*base;
@@ -112,9 +135,20 @@  struct qup_i2c_dev {
 	int			in_fifo_sz;
 	int			out_blk_sz;
 	int			in_blk_sz;
-
+	int			blocks;
+	u8			*block_tag_len;
+	int			*block_data_len;
+	int			block_pos;
 	unsigned long		one_byte_t;
 
+	int			is_hs;
+	bool			use_v2_tags;
+
+	int			tx_tag_len;
+	int			rx_tag_len;
+	u8			*tags;
+	int			tags_pos;
+
 	struct i2c_msg		*msg;
 	/* Current posion in user message buffer */
 	int			pos;
@@ -262,8 +296,13 @@  static int qup_i2c_wait_ready(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, int op, bool val,
 
 static void qup_i2c_set_write_mode(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 {
-	/* Number of entries to shift out, including the start */
-	int total = msg->len + 1;
+	/* Total Number of entries to shift out, including the tags */
+	int total;
+
+	if (qup->use_v2_tags)
+		total = msg->len + qup->tx_tag_len;
+	else
+		total = msg->len + 1; /* plus start tag */
 
 	if (total < qup->out_fifo_sz) {
 		/* FIFO mode */
@@ -277,7 +316,7 @@  static void qup_i2c_set_write_mode(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 	}
 }
 
-static void qup_i2c_issue_write(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
+static void qup_i2c_issue_write_v1(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 {
 	u32 addr = msg->addr << 1;
 	u32 qup_tag;
@@ -318,6 +357,136 @@  static void qup_i2c_issue_write(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 	}
 }
 
+static void qup_i2c_create_tag_v2(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup,
+				  struct i2c_msg *msg)
+{
+	u16 addr = (msg->addr << 1) | ((msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) == I2C_M_RD);
+	int len = 0, prev_len = 0;
+	int blocks = 0;
+	int rem;
+	int block_len = 0;
+	int data_len;
+
+	qup->block_pos = 0;
+	qup->pos = 0;
+	qup->blocks = (msg->len + QUP_READ_LIMIT - 1) / (QUP_READ_LIMIT);
+	rem = msg->len % QUP_READ_LIMIT;
+
+	/* 2 tag bytes for each block + 2 extra bytes for first block */
+	qup->tags = kzalloc((qup->blocks << 1) + 2, GFP_KERNEL);
+	qup->block_tag_len = kzalloc(qup->blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
+	qup->block_data_len = kzalloc(sizeof(int) * qup->blocks, GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	while (blocks < qup->blocks) {
+		/* 0 is used to specify a READ_LIMIT of 256 bytes */
+		data_len = (blocks < (qup->blocks - 1)) ? 0 : rem;
+
+		/* Send START and ADDR bytes only for the first block */
+		if (!blocks) {
+			qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_START;
+
+			if (qup->is_hs) {
+				qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_HS;
+				qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_START;
+			}
+
+			qup->tags[len++] = addr & 0xff;
+			if (msg->flags & I2C_M_TEN)
+				qup->tags[len++] = addr >> 8;
+		}
+
+		/* Send _STOP commands for the last block */
+		if (blocks == (qup->blocks - 1)) {
+			if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
+				qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD_STOP;
+			else
+				qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATAWR_STOP;
+		} else {
+			if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
+				qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD;
+			else
+				qup->tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATAWR;
+		}
+
+		qup->tags[len++] = data_len;
+		block_len = len - prev_len;
+		prev_len = len;
+		qup->block_tag_len[blocks] = block_len;
+
+		if (!data_len)
+			qup->block_data_len[blocks] = QUP_READ_LIMIT;
+		else
+			qup->block_data_len[blocks] = data_len;
+
+		qup->tags_pos = 0;
+		blocks++;
+	}
+
+	qup->tx_tag_len = len;
+
+	if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RD)
+		qup->rx_tag_len = (qup->blocks << 1);
+	else
+		qup->rx_tag_len = 0;
+}
+
+static u32 qup_i2c_xfer_data(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, int len,
+			     u8 *buf, int last)
+{
+	static u32 val, idx;
+	u32  t, rem, pos = 0;
+
+	rem = len - pos + idx;
+
+	while (rem) {
+		if (qup_i2c_wait_ready(qup, QUP_OUT_FULL, 0, 4)) {
+			dev_err(qup->dev, "timeout for fifo out full");
+			break;
+		}
+
+		t = (rem >= 4) ? 4 : rem;
+
+		while (idx < t)
+			val |= buf[pos++] << (idx++ << 3);
+
+		if (t == 4) {
+			writel(val, qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
+			idx = val = 0;
+		}
+
+		rem = len - pos;
+	}
+
+	if (last) {
+		writel(val, qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
+		idx = val = 0;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void qup_i2c_issue_xfer_v2(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
+{
+	u32 data_len, tag_len, rem;
+
+	tag_len = qup->block_tag_len[qup->block_pos];
+	data_len = qup->block_data_len[qup->block_pos];
+
+	qup_i2c_xfer_data(qup, tag_len, qup->tags, 0);
+
+	if (!(msg->flags & I2C_M_RD))
+		rem = qup_i2c_xfer_data(qup, data_len, msg->buf, 1);
+}
+
+static void qup_i2c_issue_write(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg
+				*msg)
+{
+	if (qup->use_v2_tags)
+		qup_i2c_issue_xfer_v2(qup, msg);
+	else
+		qup_i2c_issue_write_v1(qup, msg);
+}
+
 static int qup_i2c_write_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 {
 	unsigned long left;
@@ -326,6 +495,11 @@  static int qup_i2c_write_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 	qup->msg = msg;
 	qup->pos = 0;
 
+	if (qup->use_v2_tags)
+		qup_i2c_create_tag_v2(qup, msg);
+	else
+		qup->blocks = 0;
+
 	enable_irq(qup->irq);
 
 	qup_i2c_set_write_mode(qup, msg);
@@ -360,7 +534,8 @@  static int qup_i2c_write_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 			ret = -EIO;
 			goto err;
 		}
-	} while (qup->pos < msg->len);
+		qup->block_pos++;
+	} while (qup->block_pos < qup->blocks);
 
 	/* Wait for the outstanding data in the fifo to drain */
 	ret = qup_i2c_wait_ready(qup, QUP_OUT_NOT_EMPTY, 0, 1);
@@ -374,6 +549,11 @@  err:
 
 static void qup_i2c_set_read_mode(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, int len)
 {
+	if (qup->use_v2_tags) {
+		len += qup->rx_tag_len;
+		writel(qup->tx_tag_len, qup->base + QUP_MX_WRITE_CNT);
+	}
+
 	if (len < qup->in_fifo_sz) {
 		/* FIFO mode */
 		writel(QUP_REPACK_EN, qup->base + QUP_IO_MODE);
@@ -386,7 +566,8 @@  static void qup_i2c_set_read_mode(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, int len)
 	}
 }
 
-static void qup_i2c_issue_read(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
+static void qup_i2c_issue_read_v1(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct
+				  i2c_msg *msg)
 {
 	u32 addr, len, val;
 
@@ -395,24 +576,33 @@  static void qup_i2c_issue_read(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 	/* 0 is used to specify a length 256 (QUP_READ_LIMIT) */
 	len = (msg->len == QUP_READ_LIMIT) ? 0 : msg->len;
 
-	val = ((QUP_TAG_REC | len) << QUP_MSW_SHIFT) | QUP_TAG_START | addr;
+	val = ((QUP_TAG_REC | len) << QUP_MSW_SHIFT) | QUP_TAG_START |
+			addr;
 	writel(val, qup->base + QUP_OUT_FIFO_BASE);
 }
 
+static void qup_i2c_issue_read(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg
+			       *msg)
+{
+	if (qup->use_v2_tags)
+		qup_i2c_issue_xfer_v2(qup, msg);
+	else
+		qup_i2c_issue_read_v1(qup, msg);
+}
 
-static void qup_i2c_read_fifo(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
+static void qup_i2c_read_fifo_v1(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 {
-	u32 opflags;
 	u32 val = 0;
 	int idx;
+	int len = msg->len + qup->rx_tag_len;
 
-	for (idx = 0; qup->pos < msg->len; idx++) {
+	for (idx = 0; qup->pos < len; idx++) {
 		if ((idx & 1) == 0) {
 			/* Check that FIFO have data */
-			opflags = readl(qup->base + QUP_OPERATIONAL);
-			if (!(opflags & QUP_IN_NOT_EMPTY))
+			if (qup_i2c_wait_ready(qup, QUP_IN_NOT_EMPTY, 1, 4)) {
+				dev_err(qup->dev, "timeout for fifo not empty");
 				break;
-
+			}
 			/* Reading 2 words at time */
 			val = readl(qup->base + QUP_IN_FIFO_BASE);
 
@@ -423,11 +613,48 @@  static void qup_i2c_read_fifo(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 	}
 }
 
+static void qup_i2c_read_fifo_v2(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct
+				 i2c_msg *msg)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	int idx;
+	int pos = 0;
+	int total = qup->block_data_len[qup->block_pos] + 2;
+
+	while (pos < total) {
+		/* Check that FIFO have data */
+		if (qup_i2c_wait_ready(qup, QUP_IN_NOT_EMPTY, 1, 4)) {
+			dev_err(qup->dev, "timeout for fifo not empty");
+			break;
+		}
+		val = readl(qup->base + QUP_IN_FIFO_BASE);
+
+		for (idx = 0; idx < 4; idx++, val >>= 8, pos++) {
+			/* first 2 bytes are tag bytes */
+			if (pos < 2)
+				continue;
+
+			if (pos >= total)
+				return;
+
+			msg->buf[qup->pos++] = val & 0xff;
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+static void qup_i2c_read_fifo(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg
+			      *msg)
+{
+	if (qup->use_v2_tags)
+		qup_i2c_read_fifo_v2(qup, msg);
+	else
+		qup_i2c_read_fifo_v1(qup, msg);
+}
+
 static int qup_i2c_read_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 {
 	unsigned long left;
 	int ret;
-
 	/*
 	 * The QUP block will issue a NACK and STOP on the bus when reaching
 	 * the end of the read, the length of the read is specified as one byte
@@ -441,6 +668,10 @@  static int qup_i2c_read_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 
 	qup->msg = msg;
 	qup->pos  = 0;
+	if (qup->use_v2_tags)
+		qup_i2c_create_tag_v2(qup, msg);
+	else
+		qup->blocks = 0;
 
 	enable_irq(qup->irq);
 
@@ -452,17 +683,17 @@  static int qup_i2c_read_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 
 	writel(qup->clk_ctl, qup->base + QUP_I2C_CLK_CTL);
 
-	ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_PAUSE_STATE);
-	if (ret)
-		goto err;
+	do {
+		ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_PAUSE_STATE);
+		if (ret)
+			goto err;
 
-	qup_i2c_issue_read(qup, msg);
+		qup_i2c_issue_read(qup, msg);
 
-	ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_RUN_STATE);
-	if (ret)
-		goto err;
+		ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_RUN_STATE);
+		if (ret)
+			goto err;
 
-	do {
 		left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&qup->xfer, HZ);
 		if (!left) {
 			writel(1, qup->base + QUP_SW_RESET);
@@ -478,7 +709,8 @@  static int qup_i2c_read_one(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup, struct i2c_msg *msg)
 		}
 
 		qup_i2c_read_fifo(qup, msg);
-	} while (qup->pos < msg->len);
+		qup->block_pos++;
+	} while (qup->block_pos < qup->blocks);
 
 err:
 	disable_irq(qup->irq);
@@ -504,7 +736,12 @@  static int qup_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 		goto out;
 
 	/* Configure QUP as I2C mini core */
-	writel(I2C_MINI_CORE | I2C_N_VAL, qup->base + QUP_CONFIG);
+	if (qup->use_v2_tags) {
+		writel(I2C_MINI_CORE | I2C_N_VAL_V2, qup->base + QUP_CONFIG);
+		writel(QUP_V2_TAGS_EN, qup->base + QUP_I2C_MASTER_GEN);
+	} else {
+		writel(I2C_MINI_CORE | I2C_N_VAL, qup->base + QUP_CONFIG);
+	}
 
 	for (idx = 0; idx < num; idx++) {
 		if (msgs[idx].len == 0) {
@@ -517,6 +754,8 @@  static int qup_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 			goto out;
 		}
 
+		reinit_completion(&qup->xfer);
+
 		if (msgs[idx].flags & I2C_M_RD)
 			ret = qup_i2c_read_one(qup, &msgs[idx]);
 		else
@@ -534,6 +773,12 @@  static int qup_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
 		ret = num;
 out:
 
+	if (qup->use_v2_tags) {
+		kfree(qup->tags);
+		kfree(qup->block_tag_len);
+		kfree(qup->block_data_len);
+	}
+
 	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(qup->dev);
 	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(qup->dev);
 
@@ -556,6 +801,19 @@  static void qup_i2c_enable_clocks(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup)
 	clk_prepare_enable(qup->pclk);
 }
 
+static const struct qup_i2c_config configs[] = {
+	{ 0, 400000, },
+	{ 1, 3400000, },
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id qup_i2c_dt_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v1.1.1", .data = &configs[0] },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v2.1.1", .data = &configs[1] },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v2.2.1", .data = &configs[1] },
+	{}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qup_i2c_dt_match);
+
 static void qup_i2c_disable_clocks(struct qup_i2c_dev *qup)
 {
 	u32 config;
@@ -579,6 +837,8 @@  static int qup_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	int ret, fs_div, hs_div;
 	int src_clk_freq;
 	u32 clk_freq = 100000;
+	const struct qup_i2c_config *config;
+	const struct of_device_id *of_id;
 
 	qup = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*qup), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!qup)
@@ -590,8 +850,15 @@  static int qup_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency", &clk_freq);
 
-	/* We support frequencies up to FAST Mode (400KHz) */
-	if (!clk_freq || clk_freq > 400000) {
+	of_id = of_match_node(qup_i2c_dt_match, node);
+	if (!of_id)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	config = of_id->data;
+	qup->use_v2_tags = !!config->tag_ver;
+
+	/* We support frequencies up to HIGH SPEED Mode (3400KHz) */
+	if (!clk_freq || clk_freq > config->max_freq) {
 		dev_err(qup->dev, "clock frequency not supported %d\n",
 			clk_freq);
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -669,8 +936,17 @@  static int qup_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	qup->in_fifo_sz = qup->in_blk_sz * (2 << size);
 
 	src_clk_freq = clk_get_rate(qup->clk);
-	fs_div = ((src_clk_freq / clk_freq) / 2) - 3;
-	hs_div = 3;
+	if (clk_freq > I2C_QUP_CLK_FAST_FREQ) {
+		fs_div = I2C_QUP_CLK_FAST_FREQ;
+		hs_div = (src_clk_freq / clk_freq) / 3;
+
+		qup->is_hs = 1;
+	} else {
+		fs_div = ((src_clk_freq / clk_freq) / 2) - 3;
+		hs_div = 3;
+	}
+
+	hs_div = min_t(int, hs_div, 0x7);
 	qup->clk_ctl = (hs_div << 8) | (fs_div & 0xff);
 
 	/*
@@ -767,14 +1043,6 @@  static const struct dev_pm_ops qup_i2c_qup_pm_ops = {
 		NULL)
 };
 
-static const struct of_device_id qup_i2c_dt_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v1.1.1" },
-	{ .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v2.1.1" },
-	{ .compatible = "qcom,i2c-qup-v2.2.1" },
-	{}
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qup_i2c_dt_match);
-
 static struct platform_driver qup_i2c_driver = {
 	.probe  = qup_i2c_probe,
 	.remove = qup_i2c_remove,