Message ID | 1424883128-9841-4-git-send-email-dgilbert@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On 02/25/2015 09:51 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote: > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> > > check the return value of the function it calls and error if it's non-0 > Fixup qemu_rdma_init_one_block that is the only current caller, > and __qemu_rdma_add_block the only function it calls using it. Should we also be changing the name of __qemu_rdma_add_block to get rid of the wrong use of the reserved leading __ namespace?
* Eric Blake (eblake@redhat.com) wrote: > On 02/25/2015 09:51 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote: > > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com> > > > > check the return value of the function it calls and error if it's non-0 > > Fixup qemu_rdma_init_one_block that is the only current caller, > > and __qemu_rdma_add_block the only function it calls using it. > > Should we also be changing the name of __qemu_rdma_add_block to get rid > of the wrong use of the reserved leading __ namespace? I already did that in ba795761857082a9bb8c4be1f28e7cdd82f039b0 that got merged after I cut this patch. Dave > -- > Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 > Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c index 6dff7bc..018b07a 100644 --- a/exec.c +++ b/exec.c @@ -2944,12 +2944,18 @@ bool cpu_physical_memory_is_io(hwaddr phys_addr) memory_region_is_romd(mr)); } -void qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque) +int qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque) { RAMBlock *block; + int ret; QTAILQ_FOREACH(block, &ram_list.blocks, next) { - func(block->host, block->offset, block->used_length, opaque); + ret = func(block->idstr, block->host, block->offset, + block->used_length, opaque); + if (ret) { + return ret; + } } + return 0; } #endif diff --git a/include/exec/cpu-common.h b/include/exec/cpu-common.h index 427b851..a31300c 100644 --- a/include/exec/cpu-common.h +++ b/include/exec/cpu-common.h @@ -124,10 +124,10 @@ void cpu_flush_icache_range(hwaddr start, int len); extern struct MemoryRegion io_mem_rom; extern struct MemoryRegion io_mem_notdirty; -typedef void (RAMBlockIterFunc)(void *host_addr, +typedef int (RAMBlockIterFunc)(const char *block_name, void *host_addr, ram_addr_t offset, ram_addr_t length, void *opaque); -void qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque); +int qemu_ram_foreach_block(RAMBlockIterFunc func, void *opaque); #endif diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c index 6bee30c..d5cb6b7 100644 --- a/migration/rdma.c +++ b/migration/rdma.c @@ -569,10 +569,10 @@ static int __qemu_rdma_add_block(RDMAContext *rdma, void *host_addr, * in advanced before the migration starts. This tells us where the RAM blocks * are so that we can register them individually. */ -static void qemu_rdma_init_one_block(void *host_addr, +static int qemu_rdma_init_one_block(const char *block_name, void *host_addr, ram_addr_t block_offset, ram_addr_t length, void *opaque) { - __qemu_rdma_add_block(opaque, host_addr, block_offset, length); + return __qemu_rdma_add_block(opaque, host_addr, block_offset, length); } /*