diff mbox

[U-Boot] sunxi: Support the FEL boot mode in the regular u-boot build

Message ID 1424075039-19099-1-git-send-email-siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com
State Accepted
Delegated to: Hans de Goede
Headers show

Commit Message

Siarhei Siamashka Feb. 16, 2015, 8:23 a.m. UTC
So that the CONFIG_SPL_FEL option is not needed anymore. And the regular
SPL binary, generated by the default u-boot build, is now also bootable
over USB in the FEL mode. The SPL still can boot from the SD card too.

A bunch of system registers need to be saved/restored in order to ensure
that the IRQ handler still works in the BROM FEL code after getting
control back from the SPL. This is done in the sunxi code instead of
abusing ifdefs in 'start.S'.

The decision whether to load the main u-boot binary from the SD card or
return to the FEL code in the BROM is done at runtime.

Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
---

This patch needs to be applied after Simon's FEL patches:
    http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/437580/
    http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/437581/
    http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/437582/

The CONFIG_SPL_FEL option can be still kept during the transition period.

But we really need to get rid of this special CONFIG_SPL_FEL option as soon
as possible. Because it is an extra maintenance burden and also introduces
restrictions, such as the SPL size limit. Which hinders the addition of
useful features to the SPL.

 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c     | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/fel_utils.S | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Hans de Goede Feb. 16, 2015, 7:42 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On 16-02-15 09:23, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> So that the CONFIG_SPL_FEL option is not needed anymore. And the regular
> SPL binary, generated by the default u-boot build, is now also bootable
> over USB in the FEL mode. The SPL still can boot from the SD card too.
>
> A bunch of system registers need to be saved/restored in order to ensure
> that the IRQ handler still works in the BROM FEL code after getting
> control back from the SPL. This is done in the sunxi code instead of
> abusing ifdefs in 'start.S'.
>
> The decision whether to load the main u-boot binary from the SD card or
> return to the FEL code in the BROM is done at runtime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>

Thanks, applied to u-boot-sunxi/next and included in the pull-req
which I've just send out. Note I've might a slight change, instead
of adding the #ifndef CONFIG_SPL_FEL to not restore the extra
regs in fel_utils.S, I've removed the #ifdef-s CONFIG_SPL_FEL from
start.S (effectively reverting a small part of Simon's patch) as it
is cleaner to not have sunxi specific #ifdef-s in start.S .

Regards,

Hans

> ---
>
> This patch needs to be applied after Simon's FEL patches:
>      http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/437580/
>      http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/437581/
>      http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/437582/
>
> The CONFIG_SPL_FEL option can be still kept during the transition period.
>
> But we really need to get rid of this special CONFIG_SPL_FEL option as soon
> as possible. Because it is an extra maintenance burden and also introduces
> restrictions, such as the SPL size limit. Which hinders the addition of
> useful features to the SPL.
>
>   arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c     | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/fel_utils.S | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c
> index b7492ac..c02c015 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@
>   struct fel_stash {
>   	uint32_t sp;
>   	uint32_t lr;
> +	uint32_t cpsr;
> +	uint32_t sctlr;
> +	uint32_t vbar;
> +	uint32_t cr;
>   };
>
>   struct fel_stash fel_stash __attribute__((section(".data")));
> @@ -108,15 +112,34 @@ void s_init(void)
>    */
>   u32 spl_boot_device(void)
>   {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FEL
>   	/*
> -	 * Have we been asked to return to the FEL portion of the boot ROM?
> -	 * TODO: We need a more robust test here, or bracket this with
> -	 * #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FEL.
> +	 * This is the legacy compile time configuration for a special FEL
> +	 * enabled build. It has many restrictions and can only boot over USB.
>   	 */
> -	if (fel_stash.lr >= 0xffff0000 && fel_stash.lr < 0xffff4000)
> +	return BOOT_DEVICE_BOARD;
> +#else
> +	/*
> +	 * When booting from the SD card, the "eGON.BT0" signature is expected
> +	 * to be found in memory at the address 0x0004 (see the "mksunxiboot"
> +	 * tool, which generates this header).
> +	 *
> +	 * When booting in the FEL mode over USB, this signature is patched in
> +	 * memory and replaced with something else by the 'fel' tool. This other
> +	 * signature is selected in such a way, that it can't be present in a
> +	 * valid bootable SD card image (because the BROM would refuse to
> +	 * execute the SPL in this case).
> +	 *
> +	 * This branch is just making a decision at runtime whether to load
> +	 * the main u-boot binary from the SD card (if the "eGON.BT0" signature
> +	 * is found) or return to the FEL code in the BROM to wait and receive
> +	 * the main u-boot binary over USB.
> +	 */
> +	if (readl(4) == 0x4E4F4765 && readl(8) == 0x3054422E) /* eGON.BT0 */
> +		return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
> +	else
>   		return BOOT_DEVICE_BOARD;
> -
> -	return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
> +#endif
>   }
>
>   /* No confirmation data available in SPL yet. Hardcode bootmode */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/fel_utils.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/fel_utils.S
> index 0c1de52..e1b28a3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/fel_utils.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/fel_utils.S
> @@ -15,11 +15,34 @@ ENTRY(save_boot_params)
>   	ldr	r0, =fel_stash
>   	str	sp, [r0, #0]
>   	str	lr, [r0, #4]
> +	mrs	lr, cpsr		@ Read CPSR
> +	str	lr, [r0, #8]
> +	mrc	p15, 0, lr, c1, c0, 0	@ Read CP15 SCTLR Register
> +	str	lr, [r0, #12]
> +	mrc	p15, 0, lr, c12, c0, 0	@ Read VBAR
> +	str	lr, [r0, #16]
> +	mrc	p15, 0, lr, c1, c0, 0	@ Read CP15 Control Register
> +	str	lr, [r0, #20]
>   	b	save_boot_params_ret
>   ENDPROC(save_boot_params)
>
>   ENTRY(return_to_fel)
>   	mov	sp, r0
>   	mov	lr, r1
> +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_FEL
> +	/*
> +	 * The CONFIG_SPL_FEL build skips setting these registers,
> +	 * so there is no need to restore them here.
> +	 */
> +	ldr	r0, =fel_stash
> +	ldr	r1, [r0, #20]
> +	mcr	p15, 0, r1, c1, c0, 0	@ Write CP15 Control Register
> +	ldr	r1, [r0, #16]
> +	mcr	p15, 0, r1, c12, c0, 0	@ Write VBAR
> +	ldr	r1, [r0, #12]
> +	mcr	p15, 0, r1, c1, c0, 0	@ Write CP15 SCTLR Register
> +	ldr	r1, [r0, #8]
> +	msr	cpsr, r1		@ Write CPSR
> +#endif
>   	bx	lr
>   ENDPROC(return_to_fel)
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c
index b7492ac..c02c015 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c
@@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ 
 struct fel_stash {
 	uint32_t sp;
 	uint32_t lr;
+	uint32_t cpsr;
+	uint32_t sctlr;
+	uint32_t vbar;
+	uint32_t cr;
 };
 
 struct fel_stash fel_stash __attribute__((section(".data")));
@@ -108,15 +112,34 @@  void s_init(void)
  */
 u32 spl_boot_device(void)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FEL
 	/*
-	 * Have we been asked to return to the FEL portion of the boot ROM?
-	 * TODO: We need a more robust test here, or bracket this with
-	 * #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_FEL.
+	 * This is the legacy compile time configuration for a special FEL
+	 * enabled build. It has many restrictions and can only boot over USB.
 	 */
-	if (fel_stash.lr >= 0xffff0000 && fel_stash.lr < 0xffff4000)
+	return BOOT_DEVICE_BOARD;
+#else
+	/*
+	 * When booting from the SD card, the "eGON.BT0" signature is expected
+	 * to be found in memory at the address 0x0004 (see the "mksunxiboot"
+	 * tool, which generates this header).
+	 *
+	 * When booting in the FEL mode over USB, this signature is patched in
+	 * memory and replaced with something else by the 'fel' tool. This other
+	 * signature is selected in such a way, that it can't be present in a
+	 * valid bootable SD card image (because the BROM would refuse to
+	 * execute the SPL in this case).
+	 *
+	 * This branch is just making a decision at runtime whether to load
+	 * the main u-boot binary from the SD card (if the "eGON.BT0" signature
+	 * is found) or return to the FEL code in the BROM to wait and receive
+	 * the main u-boot binary over USB.
+	 */
+	if (readl(4) == 0x4E4F4765 && readl(8) == 0x3054422E) /* eGON.BT0 */
+		return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
+	else
 		return BOOT_DEVICE_BOARD;
-
-	return BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1;
+#endif
 }
 
 /* No confirmation data available in SPL yet. Hardcode bootmode */
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/fel_utils.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/fel_utils.S
index 0c1de52..e1b28a3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/fel_utils.S
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/fel_utils.S
@@ -15,11 +15,34 @@  ENTRY(save_boot_params)
 	ldr	r0, =fel_stash
 	str	sp, [r0, #0]
 	str	lr, [r0, #4]
+	mrs	lr, cpsr		@ Read CPSR
+	str	lr, [r0, #8]
+	mrc	p15, 0, lr, c1, c0, 0	@ Read CP15 SCTLR Register
+	str	lr, [r0, #12]
+	mrc	p15, 0, lr, c12, c0, 0	@ Read VBAR
+	str	lr, [r0, #16]
+	mrc	p15, 0, lr, c1, c0, 0	@ Read CP15 Control Register
+	str	lr, [r0, #20]
 	b	save_boot_params_ret
 ENDPROC(save_boot_params)
 
 ENTRY(return_to_fel)
 	mov	sp, r0
 	mov	lr, r1
+#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_FEL
+	/*
+	 * The CONFIG_SPL_FEL build skips setting these registers,
+	 * so there is no need to restore them here.
+	 */
+	ldr	r0, =fel_stash
+	ldr	r1, [r0, #20]
+	mcr	p15, 0, r1, c1, c0, 0	@ Write CP15 Control Register
+	ldr	r1, [r0, #16]
+	mcr	p15, 0, r1, c12, c0, 0	@ Write VBAR
+	ldr	r1, [r0, #12]
+	mcr	p15, 0, r1, c1, c0, 0	@ Write CP15 SCTLR Register
+	ldr	r1, [r0, #8]
+	msr	cpsr, r1		@ Write CPSR
+#endif
 	bx	lr
 ENDPROC(return_to_fel)