| Message ID | 000101d04430$73df7e10$5b9e7a30$@arm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@arm.com> wrote: > And the missed patch. > > Thanks, > bin > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- >> owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Bin Cheng >> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2015 2:07 PM >> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org >> Subject: [PATCH PR43378]Add test case for the issue >> >> Hi, >> I crossed to PR43378 and found it had already been fixed on trunk long >> before. I am adding a test case and going to close it after this patch. >> The case is tested, Is it OK? Ok. Thanks, Richard. >> 2015-02-09 Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@arm.com> >> >> PR tree-optimization/43378 >> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr43378.c: New test. >> >> >>
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr43378.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr43378.c (revision 0) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr43378.c (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-ivopts" } */ + +void bar (int, int, int); +void foo (int left, int rite, int element) +{ + while (left <= rite) + { + rite -= element; + bar (left, rite, element); + left += element; + } +} + +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "rite_\[0-9\]* = rite_\[0-9\]* - element" 1 "ivopts"} } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "left_\[0-9\]* = left_\[0-9\]* \\+ element|left_\[0-9\]* = element_\[0-9\]*\\(D\\) \\+ left" 1 "ivopts"} } */ +/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "ivopts" } } */