[6/6] fix audio_bug related failures

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 audio/audio.c     |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 audio/audio_int.h |    3 ++-
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

What did clang complain about?  It's not obvious to me.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

On 01/26/2010 05:14 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini<pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>   audio/audio.c     |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>   audio/audio_int.h |    3 ++-
>   2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/audio/audio.c b/audio/audio.c
> index 2a20e5b..7fce46c 100644
> --- a/audio/audio.c
> +++ b/audio/audio.c
> @@ -118,42 +118,38 @@ struct mixeng_volume nominal_volume = {
>   static void audio_print_options (const char *prefix,
>                                    struct audio_option *opt);
>
> -int audio_bug (const char *funcname, int cond)
> +void audio_bug_found (const char *funcname)
>   {
> -    if (cond) {
> -        static int shown;
> -
> -        AUD_log (NULL, "A bug was just triggered in %s\n", funcname);
> -        if (!shown) {
> -            struct audio_driver *d;
> -
> -            shown = 1;
> -            AUD_log (NULL, "Save all your work and restart without audio\n");
> -            AUD_log (NULL, "Please send bug report to av1474@comtv.ru\n");
> -            AUD_log (NULL, "I am sorry\n");
> -            d = glob_audio_state.drv;
> -            if (d) {
> -                audio_print_options (d->name, d->options);
> -            }
> +    static int shown;
> +
> +    AUD_log (NULL, "A bug was just triggered in %s\n", funcname);
> +    if (!shown) {
> +        struct audio_driver *d;
> +
> +        shown = 1;
> +        AUD_log (NULL, "Save all your work and restart without audio\n");
> +        AUD_log (NULL, "Please send bug report to av1474@comtv.ru\n");
> +        AUD_log (NULL, "I am sorry\n");
> +        d = glob_audio_state.drv;
> +        if (d) {
> +            audio_print_options (d->name, d->options);
>           }
> -        AUD_log (NULL, "Context:\n");
> +    }
> +    AUD_log (NULL, "Context:\n");
>
>   #if defined AUDIO_BREAKPOINT_ON_BUG
>   #  if defined HOST_I386
>   #    if defined __GNUC__
> -        __asm__ ("int3");
> +    __asm__ ("int3");
>   #    elif defined _MSC_VER
> -        _asm _emit 0xcc;
> +    _asm _emit 0xcc;
>   #    else
> -        abort ();
> +    abort ();
>   #    endif
>   #  else
> -        abort ();
> +    abort ();
>   #  endif
>   #endif
> -    }
> -
> -    return cond;
>   }
>   #endif
>
> diff --git a/audio/audio_int.h b/audio/audio_int.h
> index 06e313f..4244615 100644
> --- a/audio/audio_int.h
> +++ b/audio/audio_int.h
> @@ -223,7 +223,8 @@ int  audio_pcm_sw_read (SWVoiceIn *sw, void *buf, int len);
>   int audio_pcm_hw_clip_out (HWVoiceOut *hw, void *pcm_buf,
>                              int live, int pending);
>
> -int audio_bug (const char *funcname, int cond);
> +#define audio_bug(funcname, cond) ((cond) ? audio_bug_found (funcname), 1 : 0)
> +void audio_bug_found (const char *funcname);
>   void *audio_calloc (const char *funcname, int nmemb, size_t size);
>
>   void audio_run (const char *msg);
>

On 01/27/2010 03:10 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> What did clang complain about?  It's not obvious to me.

It doesn't see that audio_bug returns cond, and gives quite a few false 
positive in its callers.

Paolo

On 01/27/2010 05:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 01/27/2010 03:10 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> What did clang complain about?  It's not obvious to me.
>
> It doesn't see that audio_bug returns cond, and gives quite a few 
> false positive in its callers.

Ah, this is a clang issue.  I'll have to defer to malc on this one.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Paolo
>
>
>
>

On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Anthony Liguori wrote:

> On 01/27/2010 05:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 01/27/2010 03:10 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > What did clang complain about?  It's not obvious to me.
> > 
> > It doesn't see that audio_bug returns cond, and gives quite a few false
> > positive in its callers.
> 
> Ah, this is a clang issue.  I'll have to defer to malc on this one.
> 

I'm against it.

On 01/31/2010 04:08 AM, malc wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> On 01/27/2010 05:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 01/27/2010 03:10 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>> What did clang complain about?  It's not obvious to me.
>>>
>>> It doesn't see that audio_bug returns cond, and gives quite a few false
>>> positive in its callers.
>>
>> Ah, this is a clang issue.  I'll have to defer to malc on this one.
>
> I'm against it.

Ok, I'll withdraw this patch.  I already posted v2.

Paolo