diff mbox

ext4: fix comments in ext4_can_extents_be_merged()

Message ID 1423048305-11335-1-git-send-email-wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
State Accepted, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Xiaoguang Wang Feb. 4, 2015, 11:11 a.m. UTC
Since commit 66369e0, we are allowed to merge unwritten extents,
so here these comments are wrong, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/ext4/extents.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Theodore Ts'o April 2, 2015, 8:55 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 07:11:45PM +0800, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
> Since commit 66369e0, we are allowed to merge unwritten extents,
> so here these comments are wrong, remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

Thanks, applied.

BTW, the commit ID was wrong; I've corrected it to be a9b8241594add.

						- Ted
						
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index bed4308..2e6af88 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -1717,12 +1717,6 @@  ext4_can_extents_be_merged(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_extent *ex1,
 {
 	unsigned short ext1_ee_len, ext2_ee_len;
 
-	/*
-	 * Make sure that both extents are initialized. We don't merge
-	 * unwritten extents so that we can be sure that end_io code has
-	 * the extent that was written properly split out and conversion to
-	 * initialized is trivial.
-	 */
 	if (ext4_ext_is_unwritten(ex1) != ext4_ext_is_unwritten(ex2))
 		return 0;